- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/7/17 at 11:59 am to Salmon
97% of scientist... despite actual scientist speaking out against that false narrative.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:30 pm to dbuchanon
Liberals like portray science as pure fact. The fact is that science is a creation of man to help him better understand the world around him, and is subject to every human weakness known: greed, pride, laziness, political agendas, etc.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:33 pm to RBWilliams8
quote:
97% of scientist... despite actual scientist speaking out against that false narrative.
That 97% (or close to it) has been proven to be true in every survey conducted so far.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:33 pm to dbuchanon
bump for later
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:36 pm to CptBengal
quote:
how did that fat little troll, Steltzer, get a show?
It was his turn?
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:38 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
The fact is that science is a creation of man to help him better understand the world around him, and is subject to every human weakness known: greed, pride, laziness, political agendas, etc.
While this is certainly true, Climate Change/Global Warming is the only thing within science that with more the research we have confirming the idea, the less people believe it.
Which I know it is al purely political driven. In a world in which politics never hijacked global warming, the vast majority of people, even the people that are strict deniers today, wouldn't be as skeptical. They would take, in good faith, like they do with every other scientific idea, that the experts know more than they do.
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm to Salmon
Experts that are expected to return certain results and follow through on that shouldn't be considered experts. It's amazing in court when two experts completely disagree. They always seem to be aligned with the party that is paying them. Same thing with global warming experts...
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 1:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Chicken and egg. One tends to hire those that agree with themselves. (Hint: that happens A LOT in academia!)
They always seem to be aligned with the party that is paying them.
What I find entertaining is the belief that government money = 100% always objective impartial results. Any other money = pure tainted results!
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 1:43 pm to dbuchanon
That was great.
Posted on 6/7/17 at 1:47 pm to bmy
quote:
Are we now claiming that it's not even worth researching?
Even Trump's EPA pick admits that humans contribute to climate change
Show me a believer, scientist or politician, who lives a lifestyle that indicates that he believes in global warming and it is man made.
How come the Al Gore and Obama crowd spew more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than a thousand deniers.
Don't you believe a compassionate progressive would try to protect the folks and their children if they truly believed.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News