- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:38 pm to OMLandshark
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
The Dems aren't going to nominate someone who doesn't believe in their platform. What would be the point? Romney is MORE conservative than Trump socially. Maher is just trying to stay relevant.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:39 pm to tigerite
quote:Perhaps.
Everybody knows that President Obama would have readily defeated Donald Trump. This is not disputed.
But his national party legacy has been abysmal.
OTOH, why did Michelle not run this time?
What qualifications does she have?
I really hope you are wrong.
I hope an angry woman with little in the way of qualification or experience is not the left's best hope in 2020.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:39 pm to tigerite
Do they not realize that BO gave us Trump? ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:39 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
Just like Hillary.
And Hillary Clinton actually won the election.
So, she can't be that unlikable.
The Electoral Collage essentially stole the election.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:41 pm to NIH
quote:
The Dems aren't going to nominate someone who doesn't believe in their platform. What would be the point?
Well, unless they change their platform (which they should), then they're going to lose unless Trump does something wholly catastrophic that everyone agrees with.
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:41 pm to tigerite
quote:Hillary was a US Senator and SoS. What in the world are Michelle's qualifications?
Just like Hillary.
And Hillary Clinton actually won the election.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:42 pm to OMLandshark
They haven't even accepted that they actually lost yet, let alone look inward to tweak their platform. I think they've opened pandora's box-I see no way they go back further to the middle. In their eyes, they were robbed In November and America wanted more socialist, radical bullshite.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:44 pm to tigerite
quote:
And Hillary Clinton actually won the election.
So, she can't be that unlikable.
The Electoral Collage [sic] essentially stole the election.
You see that you made an irrational statement, right?
This post was edited on 1/22/17 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:45 pm to tigerite
quote:
The Electoral Collage essentially stole the election
This is one of my favorite liberal melts. They insist they won a race no one was running.
Redo the election with a popular vote outcome and she probably loses by even more because all the conservative New Yorkers and Californians come out because they feel their vote would count.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 5:49 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
Redo the election with a popular vote outcome and she probably loses by even more because all the conservative New Yorkers and Californians come out because they feel their vote would count.
More liberals would come out and vote. California and New York, in a fair and just election, would insure that no more "business men" with no political experience would foist themselves on this nation.
Posted on 1/22/17 at 6:03 pm to tigerite
School children who want food say," hell no!"
Posted on 1/22/17 at 6:10 pm to tigerite
quote:
More liberals would come out and vote.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
quote:
California and New York, in a fair and just election, would insure that no more "business men"
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
. . . . . . m e l t ! ! !
Posted on 1/22/17 at 6:24 pm to tigerite
What would she run on? She doesn't have a resume at all other than being a Presidents wife
Posted on 1/22/17 at 6:27 pm to tigerite
Jesus Christ you lunatics are taking melting to a whole new level.
There will never be another Democrat President as long as the SJWs, anarchists, and media keep acting like this.
But keep up the melts, they are entertaining as frick
There will never be another Democrat President as long as the SJWs, anarchists, and media keep acting like this.
But keep up the melts, they are entertaining as frick
Posted on 1/22/17 at 6:27 pm to tigerite
quote:
There is already a cry (with plenty of support) for Michelle Obama to run in 2020. It is not yet a groundswell, but it will get their quickly.
The only downside to her being the perfect candidate is the "political dynasty" issue. She would clearly win, as she would have exactly the same votes that President Obama would have had if he had been able to run against Trump.
These are facts.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 1/22/17 at 6:37 pm to AZTarheeel
quote:
There will never be another Democrat President as long as the SJWs, anarchists, and media keep acting like this.
What you don't understand is that there should be a Democratic president right now - HILLARY CLINTON won the vote. Fact.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)