Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Trump's options for North Korea include placing nukes in South Korea

Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:57 pm
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:57 pm
quote:

The National Security Council has presented President Trump with options to respond to North Korea's nuclear program — including putting American nukes in South Korea or killing dictator Kim Jong-un, multiple top-ranking intelligence and military officials told NBC News.

Both scenarios are part of an accelerated review of North Korea policy prepared in advance of President Donald Trump's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping this week.

The White House hopes the Chinese will do more to influence Pyongyang through diplomacy and enhanced sanctions. But if that fails, and North Korea continues its development of nuclear weapons, there are other options on the table that would significantly alter U.S. policy.

The first and most controversial course of action under consideration is placing U.S. nuclear weapons in South Korea. The U.S. withdrew all nuclear weapons from South Korea 25 years ago. Bringing back bombs — likely to Osan Air Base, less than 50 miles south of the capital of Seoul — would mark the first overseas nuclear deployment since the end of the Cold War, an unquestionably provocative move.


LINK
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:58 pm to
in germany, too.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38229 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:58 pm to
Good. MAD. If Little Kim wants to start shite he'll lose it all in the blink of an eye.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11281 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:59 pm to
MAGA?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

The first and most controversial course of action under consideration is placing U.S. nuclear weapons in South Korea.
Will not happen.

/thread
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62423 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:10 pm to
I think he ought to do it, or at least bluff it. China would shite themselves and take care of North Korea(lil Kim) to prevent it.
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
19267 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:10 pm to
Bad thought.Nukes aren't the answer to solving problems except the one time they were used.

The next time could trigger the end of all of us....

Why end the world over one dumb fat little korean bastard?

There are ways to negotiate and off this little prick..
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:12 pm to
Poor Toddy.

He spent all afternoon buried in a ball sack and had no idea that there is another thread.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15705 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:15 pm to
That peninsula has been surrounded for years. Nothing new here.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Trump's options for North Korea include placing nukes in South Korea
So? Before I met my wife, had all of the stars aligned, Kate Beckinsale was always an option for me in my mind. Does the fact that I considered it, really make it more viable than if I hadn't?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79663 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Toddy


Aren't you quite the little warmonger of late.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:17 pm to
Toddy must like guys in uniforms
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38229 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Bad thought.Nukes aren't the answer to solving problems except the one time they were used.


Nuclear weapons are the greatest deterrent to WW3. No one wants a nuclear war. Putting ground-based nukes in SK sends a clear message to NK and China that a state conflict between the Koreas will not be tolerated.
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18183 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:19 pm to
You have had missiles in places they shouldn't be, am I right?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64325 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:22 pm to
Ask Russia how that worked.

Only the best option if all others have failed.
Posted by jlntiger
Member since Feb 2011
1440 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:35 pm to
Good glad someone has the balls to stand up to NK
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28337 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 2:08 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

There are ways to negotiate
Which ways?
quote:

off this little prick..
What good would that do?
This post was edited on 4/7/17 at 10:44 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 4/7/17 at 10:44 pm to
Bad idea. Would quickly lead to China aggression.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram