- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump’s lawyers enter crimes committed by other presidents that were not charged
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:52 am to GumboPot
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:52 am to GumboPot
quote:
Trump will win on November 5th.
How in the heck are you so confident seeing what we've witnessed from 2016 on?
No chance he gets back to the WH with so much riding on the line IMO They will use every power available to them, including assassination, to block that from happening. They have way too much to lose.
0
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:55 am to Indefatigable
He was one of those short school bus riders
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:57 am to Mickey Goldmill
although libs like you will valiantly try, making the argument that a sitting president asking questions and wanting more scrutiny around a highly suspicious presidential election is somehow a "personal crime" is pretty dumb. Hell. The idea that we a re starting from the assumption that the election wasnt fricked with is insane on its face.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:02 am to Rebel
quote:
Be careful what you wish for Mickey.
Should this case go through, every ex-president will stand trial.
He knows that Clinton, W. and Soerto will never stand trial.
He knows that only anti-MIC anti-Uniparty presidents will ever be affected. Like, Trump, since he's the only one still alive.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:10 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Jack Smith didn't bring these charges.
Not sure if that matters.
He is minimally part of the conspiracy to bring them.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:11 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Imagine thinking that remand so that the trial court can actually make the determination at issue in the case is "corrupt."
Imagine thinking there's a genuine question around whether inciting an insurrection and attempting to violently overthrow the US government requires a trial court to say that's not an official act.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:13 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Imagine thinking there was an insurrection and attempt to violently overthrow the US government
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:13 am to BamaAtl
quote:
attempting to violently overthrow the US government
Boy they sunk that hook deep in you...
Useful idiot at best...
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:17 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Imagine thinking there's a genuine question around whether inciting an insurrection and attempting to violently overthrow the US government requires a trial court to say that's not an official act.
Cot damn. This has to be an act.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:17 am to GumboPot
quote:This is what Mike Davis and some others are saying. But I am wary. This may be predicted via a rose-colored lens of the way things should be...
Prediction:
SCOTUS sends the case back down to Chutkan and forces her to have an evidentiary hearing and force her to make a determination between official and private acts.
Of course she will rule in favor of Jack. Trump will then make an interlocutory appeal to the DC Circuit. The DC Circuit will rule in favor of Jack.
Trump will request an en banc hearing from the DC Circuit. He will be denied.
Trump then will appeal to SCOTUS.
SCOTUS accepts and sets a hearing date after November 5th.
Trump will win on November 5th.
The Trump DOJ will drop the charges. The SCOTUS hearing is then off the docket.
Bottom-line they will one way or another remove Trump from the ballot. In case people vote OTHER and write his name in they may jail or JFK him.
If the republican party were on team America First-Trump it would be a completely different outcome.
But they aren't
Loading Twitter Embed....
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:17 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The case really boils down to official acts vs private acts.
What about the Congressional slush fund to pay off allegations of impropriety? There's been little to no news on this since it came to light in 2017, when there was nearly $18M of taxpayer dollars spent to make sexual assault/harassment allegations go away.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/21/16679292/secret-fund-pays-victims-sexual-harassment-the-hill
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:18 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Imagine thinking there's a genuine question around whether inciting an insurrection and attempting to violently overthrow the US government requires a trial court to say that's not an official act.
Again, retard. How was Trump supposed to incite a crowd to overthrow a government HE WAS THE HEAD OF?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:20 am to Rebel
quote:
Should this case go through, every ex-president will stand trial.
No they won't. The powerbase/shadow government will never allow it. No one in the CIA or FBI will touch Obama, Clinton, or Biden.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:24 am to BamaAtl
quote:
He'll still get his delay because SCOTUS is corrupt
The depths of your partisan hackery know no limits
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:25 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Imagine thinking there's a genuine question around whether inciting an insurrection and attempting to violently overthrow the US government
It's a good thing that this quite literally did not happen. Don't you think so?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:32 am to BamaAtl
And if it's an "iNsUrReCtIoN", then why hasn't a single one of the HUNDREDS of political prisoners currently being unconstitutionally detained by the District of Columbia & illegitimate Department of Injustice been charged with statutorily-defined Insurrection? There's a US Code entry for it.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:33 am to Rebel
quote:
Every ex President will stand trail.
No
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:33 am to Kracka
quote:
No they won't. The powerbase/shadow government will never allow it. No one in the CIA or FBI will touch Obama, Clinton, or Biden.
Your premise presumes that in that scenario, the uniparty swampers will have a say in the matter.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:37 am to GumboPot
This is exactly what will happen
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:39 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Imagine thinking there's a genuine question around whether inciting an insurrection and attempting to violently overthrow the US government requires a trial court to say that's not an official act.
Have you ever considered integrating reality into your arguments? I recommend it highly. It demonstrates that you take yourself seriously and helps other people take you seriously.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News