Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Trump's Appointments are Pretty Low Energy Thus Far

Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:07 pm
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73494 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:07 pm
Other than Sessions, this administrations has a Jeb Bush flavor. I hope he does better with defenense and state.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24976 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:25 pm to
Here's your attention
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:25 pm to
1 like equals 1 energy. 1 shares equals 10 energy.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19810 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Here's your attention


That took nearly 20 mins. Swing and a miss by the OP
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:27 pm to
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

He is picking people who seem to be doing exactly what he has said he is going to do.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73494 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:41 pm to
So, this is what you all had in mind then?
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:09 pm to
His choices are serious and capable of making change, not celebrity showboats who would merely sound good on The View.

If you were paying attention, every last one of his picks have the power and the capability of moving their respective departments in a completely new direction.
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 10:12 pm
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73494 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:12 pm to
So, now the establishment is the impetus of change. Very interesting.
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:16 pm to
You guys are confused on what 'The Establishment' is. Being a billionaire because you have been in business doesn't make you 'The Establishment'. Being in politics for 30 years and being worth 200 million dollars when you've never held a real job makes you 'The Establishment'.

You are being spoon-fed the MSM's new definition of 'The Establishment'. Now it's simply anyone with financial success.
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 10:19 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Other than Sessions


Flynn and Pompeo will kick arse on national security and immigration.

Mattis as SecDef will be high energy as frick.

Price is going to beat the shite out of ObamaCare.

Romney won't be Clinton peddling influence to foreign leaders and won't be the hapless and out of touch diplomat Kerry is.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:23 pm to
Sessions is probably the worst pick out of his cabinet so far.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Sessions is probably the worst pick out of his cabinet so far.


A libertarian nightmare.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:26 pm to
Yyyyyuuuuuppp

I'm not a libertarian, but I am pro-small government. Sessions is not.
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 10:27 pm
Posted by RabidTiger
Member since Nov 2009
3127 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:31 pm to
How many more billionaires can we get in there?
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Sessions is probably the worst pick out of his cabinet so far.



I'm definitely not a fan of him either but I've seen that Trump is not going to be a huge WoD guy and that presumably will flown down to AG and he's still going to crack the fricking whip on one of the greatest issues of our time and that's illegal immigration and this country will be better off as a result.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 11:08 pm to
I would also like to see some movement on civil asset forfeiture, but that doesn't seem likely under Sessions.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73494 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 7:00 am to
I would be happy with Mattis, but that position has not been announced. Why Romney? Why not Bolton?

Goldman Sachs folks and McConnel's wife are high energy?


Whichever poster mentioned the MSM, you really don't know me at all.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 7:18 am
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90617 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 7:39 am to
frick Bolton. I'll take Mitt over that war mongering idiot
Posted by geauxtigersgirl
Member since Aug 2016
1314 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 7:41 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/13/21 at 10:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram