- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump not keeping his promise on Muslim refugees
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:00 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:00 pm to SirWinston
quote:
How about rallying the GOP governors to refuse them
Pretty sure that they can't if the president places them there. I'm not very big into allowing refugees in mass to enter our country no matter what religion, race, color, sex, or any other classification they may be. But legal immigration should be open to any and all that meet the vetting requirements.
0
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:00 pm to SirWinston
quote:
prosecuting and locking up Hillary Clinton was a wrestling chant, not a serious issue. anybody with a brain knows that
So like 1/3 of Trump supporters have brains. Got it
This post was edited on 4/24/17 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:01 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Most of them were understood to be hyperbole
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:03 pm to AUstar
quote:
The constitution does not apply to citizens of the world. If the president wants to ban all immigrants that are over 6'2, he has the right to do it.
It's not that our constitution applies to anyone else in the world. It's that it established a religious test, which is unconstitutional in any form by the government. Doesn't matter who the test applies too. The big picture (and why it is impermissible) is that the government is favoring one religion, or in constitutional terms "endorsing a religion," which is a violation of the 1A.
Put another way, no jurisdiction or government in the USA can establish a religious test, no matter who or what it is applied to.
This post was edited on 4/24/17 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:03 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Nobody saw this coming. Or telling US citizens to pay for his dumbass wall. Or the non repeal of Obamacare. Or.....
Don't feel bad
Nobody thought people would vote for a woman who openly called a race of people "super predators that need to be brought to heel", increased mass incarceration, & mocked a culture saying the #1 thing she can't go w/out is "hot sauce in her purse"......
.... but the "elites" & the ones she mocked voted in droves for her like she was the next messiah
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:19 pm to TigernMS12
I must have missed the part where TB carrying Somalians have constitutional rights
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:25 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Or telling US citizens to pay for his dumbass wall.
The wall Obama, Hillary, Chuck Schumer, and Harry Reid voted for?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:28 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I must have missed the part where TB carrying Somalians have constitutional rights
Again, they don't (unless they are in the jurisdiction of the US, and then they do the same as illegal immigrants from Mexico are guaranteed due process; this is settled law and beyond dispute).
The Constitution says that the government can't endorse a religion, which means that the government cannot favor one religion over another or create a religious test. It has absolutely nothing to do with who the test is being applied to. It's our government saying Christians are better than Muslims, which is exactly why the establishment clause is in place. It's a limit on the federal government, not a personal right.
It does not say the government may not establish/endorse a religion regarding citizens, but all bets are off with immigrants. It says SHALL NOT, which is under any circumstances.
Edited to add:
quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
That's the establishment clause quoted from the 1A. It's all about the government establishing something, not who it is applied to.
This post was edited on 4/24/17 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:31 pm to Toddy
quote:
Most of them were understood to be hyperbole
Oh OK
Its true.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:32 pm to tigersbh
quote:
The wall Obama, Hillary, Chuck Schumer, and Harry Reid voted for?
Let's try and stay on task. This isn't about Hillary or the other POSs you mentioned. It's about the POS you helped elect.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:50 pm to lsu2006
quote:
Let's try and stay on task. This isn't about Hillary or the other POSs you mentioned. It's about the POS you helped elect.
I guess I should have voted for Hillary. lol
Posted on 4/24/17 at 9:03 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Most of them were understood to be hyperbole
There you have it folks.
We just witnessed the goal posts getting moved.
Sad.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News