- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:59 am to StormyMcMan
Posted on 6/26/17 at 9:59 am to StormyMcMan
quote:
but wasn't this ban supposed to only last, at most, 120 days
Yes but it could be extended if need be
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:00 am to LSUTigersVCURams
E
X
C
E
L
L
E
N
T
&
M
A
G
A
X
C
E
L
L
E
N
T
&
M
A
G
A
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:00 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
I found the answer about the 120 day review. It hasn't proceeded because the judge in Hawaii blocked the administration from moving forward with the review. LINK
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:01 am to mofungoo
And they were quoting previous precedent there. Long known, long established precedent.
That the 9th and other judges just conveniently completely ignored.
That the 9th and other judges just conveniently completely ignored.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:05 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
The ban itself, is really immaterial to me. To me, it's protecting our country through the actions of The President based on intelligence, not on feelings.
The ban itself didn't matter to the liberal morons either. They simply use this as another excuse to try to mitigate Trump winning the election.
I'm so sick of it.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:05 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
AP: High Court reinstates travel ban
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:06 am to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
It hasn't proceeded because the judge in Hawaii blocked the administration from moving forward with the review. LINK
there was a lot of conflicting information in that article
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:07 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
The ban itself didn't matter to the liberal morons either. They simply use this as another excuse to try to mitigate Trump winning the election.
Does this set precedent that Trump can do any travel ban he wants?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:09 am to Fun Bunch
Semi-related topic...
Will this shite show help Trump push for a split of the Ninth Circus into two or three separate circuits?
The circus makes up about 20% of the US population while no other circuit covers more than about 10%. In fact many circuits covers about 6%.
Will this shite show help Trump push for a split of the Ninth Circus into two or three separate circuits?
The circus makes up about 20% of the US population while no other circuit covers more than about 10%. In fact many circuits covers about 6%.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:10 am to Jake88
quote:
If this is a 90 day ban and more than 90 days has passed since first signed by Trump, isn't this too little too late? If it's a 90 day ban,but won't be heard by SCOTUS till October, what's the point?
Because it never went into effect, so the clock starts now
And it can be re-written or extended, and it wont be challenged, knowing that SCOTUS is already reviewing it
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:12 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
The ban itself didn't matter to the liberal morons either. They simply use this as another excuse to try to mitigate Trump winning the election.
It is just a part of the sore loser lefties' RESISTANCE BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!
I noticed this morning CBS and ABC said almost nothing about the ruling.
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 10:23 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:16 am to hsfolk
Where are all of our resident libs?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:28 am to Janky
quote:
Where are all of our resident libs?
Most of them have to wait on talking points to be pushed out before they will have anything to say.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:34 am to LSUTigersVCURams
Well written opinion. However I'm concerned that it leaves a very wide open door for most to enter the u.s. The exceptions listed such as to live with a family member, attend school, or to work for an American company still allows (I suspect) the vast majority of those seeking to enter. It's not hard to find a fourth cousin or a sympathetic community college.
Im not sure this is as big a win as was hoped for
Im not sure this is as big a win as was hoped for
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 10:36 am
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:35 am to MrLarson
Lol no chief. It specificallly carved out limitations
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:42 am to Janky
quote:
Where are all of our resident libs?
They all went to a safe space and are having a group hug.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:43 am to LSUTigersVCURams
Been waiting on this since the circuit court decision.
Now all of the apologist snowflakes can sit down and stfu.
Now all of the apologist snowflakes can sit down and stfu.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:47 am to UHTiger
quote:
Lol no chief. It specificallly carved out limitations
Meh, only a few people will be able to come to the USA.
I'm getting a big laugh because the final ruling won't come until October but the travel ban is only for 90 days.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 10:50 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:Exceptions for:
Meh, only a few people will be able to come to the USA.
Family
Employees of US Company
Students
Refugees
This is the watered down EO, not the first one.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News