- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Judge Order just elected Trump.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:34 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
ut I am much less confident in this particular case. If you read legal blogs, there seems to be consensus that if any of the cases have a chance to fail, it’s this one. It’s really the only case where trump can make reasonable arguments in court.
Better re-up your prescription
0
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:47 pm to blueboxer1119
This is not a legal proceeding this is lawfare and this judge is acting as a two bit tyrant!
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:51 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What is it the right says? If he didn't do anything wrong, he has nothing to be worried about.
Only ignorant people on the right say this
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:53 pm to BamaAtl
Bamadouche to the rescue.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:56 pm to geoag58
quote:Perhaps, as to some some of his rulings. But I would be interested to see your argument as to how he is being a "tyrant" with regard to the "Barron graduation" issue.
this judge is acting as a two bit tyrant!
Here is the relevant procedural rule:
quote:The Rule clearly gives a judge the discretion to excuse a Defendant's presence from trial only when there is no objection from the prosecution.
Section 340.50 - Defendant's presence at trial
1. Except as provided in subdivision two or three, a defendant must be personally present during the trial.
2. On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial. Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to conduct his defense.
3. A defendant who conducts himself in so disorderly and disruptive a manner that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom may be removed from the courtroom if, after he has been warned by the court that he will be removed if he continues such conduct, he continues to engage in such conduct.
Please explain how you think that judge has the authority to excuse Trump's presence (even for only one day), given such an objection from the DA.
This post was edited on 4/15/24 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:57 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
It’s really the only case where trump can make reasonable arguments in court.
Really? So Trump can’t make reasonable arguments in the other cases?!
I think it’s reasonable for him to say that Biden, as a VP took classified documents and stored them in multiple unsecured places and shared top secret information with a publisher and isn’t being prosecuted, but he is. I think that’s very reasonable.
Or how about Fanni Willis is corrupt and her case against Trump is politically motivated. I think that’s reasonable.
Or how about the case where he supposedly inflated his real estate? The bank’s own assessors evaluated his properties, ok’d the loans, and the loans were paid back. I think it’s reasonable to assume no one was harmed.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 6:57 pm to Vacherie Saint
I know what I was doing, and it was the same thing this board does in every fricking post.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:01 pm to chili pup
Our population is wading into the deep end of stupidity all because of their TDS. Rational people see this utter BS of prosecutions against Trump for what they are, political prosecutions.
Our resident TDS posters expose themselves daily as morally corrupted individuals that can’t think for themselves.
They will celebrate any convictions against Trump and ignore all corruption from politicians that are on their “side”. Only, they are too stupid to understand that the very corruption they champion will lead to worse and worse consequences for our nation and themselves.
Our resident TDS posters expose themselves daily as morally corrupted individuals that can’t think for themselves.
They will celebrate any convictions against Trump and ignore all corruption from politicians that are on their “side”. Only, they are too stupid to understand that the very corruption they champion will lead to worse and worse consequences for our nation and themselves.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:04 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Ever been a sole defendant in a criminal trial?
Did you read the post I replied to? As in “if he didn’t do anything wrong, what does he have to worry about?” This whole thing is manufactured to impede his daily movements and everyone knows it.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Georgia will fail.
W/ the government not pursuing Biden for the same "crime" this will no be as a big deal as the media wants it to be
W/ the government not pursuing Biden for the same "crime" this will no be as a big deal as the media wants it to be
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:04 pm to OzonaOkapi
When the case is predicated on lawfare anyone arguing the rule of law should be followed can shove the rules up their arse!
How many more of these lawfare proceedings against President Trump do you need to see before you understand this is lawfare and not legal proceedings?
How many more of these lawfare proceedings against President Trump do you need to see before you understand this is lawfare and not legal proceedings?
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:05 pm to chili pup
Why does this graduation matter to you guys?? He’s only attended one of his kids graduations and chose not to attend the others.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:07 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Maybe the online course lawyers on here can explain why it is a requirement for a defendant to be in court for this when he has lawyers to represent him.
There is zero requirement that trump be present
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:09 pm to geauxlsu07
Has nothing to do with the graduation. Has everything to do with the weaponization of the legal system against the candidate of the oppisition party. Only a lowlife totalitarian commie is not able to see this.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:10 pm to dafif
quote:Please explain your reasoning, in light of the following:
There is zero requirement that trump be present
quote:
Section 340.50 - Defendant's presence at trial
1. Except as provided in subdivision two or three, a defendant must be personally present during the trial.
2. On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial. Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to conduct his defense.
3. A defendant who conducts himself in so disorderly and disruptive a manner that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom may be removed from the courtroom if, after he has been warned by the court that he will be removed if he continues such conduct, he continues to engage in such conduct.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:13 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What is it the right says?
If he didn't do anything wrong, he has nothing to be worried abo
The right doesn't say that. Try again. Perhaps you are confused with what Joseph Goebbels once said, "If you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hide." And as we all know, Goebbels was Hitler's Propaganda Minister, which would make him a lefty socialist.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:25 pm to BamaAtl
You piece of shite.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:30 pm to OzonaOkapi
Trying to argue the merits of the legal rules about a court proceeding barely worthy of a banana republic makes one appear pretentious.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:36 pm to BamaAtl
I say that the Democrat Party is corrupt and anyone who supports them are either low information voters or complicit with their actions. Most common sense working class Democrats left the Jackass Party years ago.
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:49 pm to DEG
quote:
Rational Americans are tired of Trump’s faux victimhood. This won’t help him like you thing.
Men can’t get pregnant no matter how rational you believe you are.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News