- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The FBI Acknowledges They Have Been Investigating Trump/Russia for 8-9 Months
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:26 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:26 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
We haven't even got to the never-ending congressional hearings like with Benghazi. This scandal is still fresh. Give it time.
People like you aren't interested in justice. You just want revenge for not getting your way.
1
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:28 pm to KCT
quote:
The FBI Acknowledges They Have Been Investigating Trump/Russia for 8-9 Months
So basically they've been creatively thinking up fake scenarios, and story lines for the last eight to nine months...
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:29 pm to KCT
quote:Besides every time that Trump, Spicer, or one of his campaign and transition members lied about talks with Russian diplomats and potential spies and all of their direct ties? Besides all of that perhaps the evidence suggesting collusion during the election that led to an FBI investigation.
In the Benghazi situation, both Obama & Clinton lied, falsely blaming the attack on an internet video.
Give me the Trump/Russia equivalent to that.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:30 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Only if it was classified.
If it involved NSA surveillance (and it did), then it is highly classified. The release of classified information is a felony.
If someone on the inside declassified the Flynn call, then that came from high-up (White House) which means you would be admitting that Obama was complicit in the leaks and the surveillance. Therefore, Trump's tweet was correct.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:30 pm to KCT
Apologies if I missed something. Is this breaking news? Honest question.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:31 pm to Paluka
quote:No. KCT likes to rehash old arguments after they are shut down.
Apologies if I missed something. Is this breaking news? Honest question.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:33 pm to Paluka
quote:
Apologies if I missed something. Is this breaking news? Honest question.
Show me where I said it was breaking news?
The point is, what kind of trust level should a reasonably objective American citizen have that the IC is even credible?
Capiche?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:36 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Apologies if I missed something. Is this breaking news? Honest question.
No. KCT likes to rehash old arguments after they are shut down.
So the investigation is still in progress, but discussion has been discontinued?
Dumbass
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:39 pm to AUstar
quote:It could have been declassified or been fabricated.
If it involved NSA surveillance (and it did), then it is highly classified. The release of classified information is a felony.
quote:Trump wasn't under direct surveillance for political purposes. If he was surveilled, the FBI had good reason.
If someone on the inside declassified the Flynn call, then that came from high-up (White House) which means you would be admitting that Obama was complicit in the leaks and the surveillance. Therefore, Trump's tweet was correct.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:39 pm to KCT
I did not say it was breaking news. I ASKED a fricking question. An Honest question.
As far as your question is concerned I do not trust anyone in D.C. Not the IC or anyone one politically motivated.
I believe they all see themselves as the ruling class. As such, they do not represent any of the people they are supposed to be representing.
All of the investigations and power plays are a means to get Trump "in line" with the rest of them.
As far as your question is concerned I do not trust anyone in D.C. Not the IC or anyone one politically motivated.
I believe they all see themselves as the ruling class. As such, they do not represent any of the people they are supposed to be representing.
All of the investigations and power plays are a means to get Trump "in line" with the rest of them.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:39 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
.....and they have reportedly found nothing (according to Clapper, Morrell & others). Why is this "case" still open?
quote:
Maybe they are doing their job and being thorough Investigations last much longer
They were pretty thorough with the Hillary Private Email Server, and found that she did in deed break numerous laws surround the negligent handling of classified materials.
Then they disregarded the statute and acted like intent mattered, when it clearly does not by statute. Worse still they had evidence of intent too because in one case that we know about, Hillary directed her staffer to remove the classified headings and send it to her on her private email.
This was when she needed a copy of a classified briefing talking points and the secure system was down.
They also should have inferred tort after her spoliation of evidence in breaking with a hammer many email devices and the wiping of the server with Bleachbit.
But alas they said she did everything she was accused of but somehow they wouldn't recommend it to go to a grand jury.
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:46 pm to PygmalionEffect
Hillary Clinton may as well have shot the guys in Benghazi personally
This story is bullshite so dems can grandstand
This story is bullshite so dems can grandstand
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:49 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
vidence suggesting collusion during the election that led to an FBI investigation
A phone call isn't collusion moron. They could have the Russians over for dinner every night of the week and it wouldn't be against the law.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:52 pm to KCT
quote:
.....and they have reportedly found nothing (according to Clapper, Morrell & others). Why is this "case" still open?
Why do you say they haven't found anything? How do you know that?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:53 pm to Paluka
quote:
I did not say it was breaking news. I ASKED a fricking question. An Honest question.
As far as your question is concerned I do not trust anyone in D.C. Not the IC or anyone one politically motivated.
I believe they all see themselves as the ruling class. As such, they do not represent any of the people they are supposed to be representing.
All of the investigations and power plays are a means to get Trump "in line" with the rest of them.
Hey, my apologies. I misread your intent, bc 1-2 posters had already implied that this subject shouldn't even be discussed.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:55 pm to KCT
No problem.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:05 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
I'm sure you expressed the same concerns for Hillary after 3 years and six separate investigations on Behgazi didn't you?
Concerned they didn't find anything, yes.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:41 pm to Godfather1
Investigation started in July. Manafort resigns days later.
Coincidence beyond belief
Coincidence beyond belief
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:03 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
If he was surveilled, the FBI had good reason.
to beat him down if he got elected
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:55 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Maybe they are doing their job and being thorough Investigations last much longer
Yet they were able to conclude no spying on Trump campaign within a matter of weeks...
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News