- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme Ct dismisses travel ban challenge
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:06 pm
6
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:08 pm to Da Sheik
They decided the issue was moot without examining the merits since this challenge was based on the now replaced ban. So let's keep in mind that there is still a lot of legal wrangling to go on this topic.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:10 pm to Da Sheik
T R U M P
R
U
M
P
R
U
M
P
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:10 pm to Da Sheik
Why would the SCOTUS even review this case? A travel ban isn't violating anyone's constitutional rights.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:13 pm to CorporateTiger
Melt
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:14 pm to Da Sheik
Not tired yet.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:26 pm to Da Sheik
My only regret is that the District Court judge from Hawaii wasn't publicly slapped down for deciding that President Trump's temporary immigration ban constituted a violation of the Establishment Clause.
His opinion is so gloriously stupid it needed to be put on a pedestal and ridiculed in the annals of legal history.
His opinion is so gloriously stupid it needed to be put on a pedestal and ridiculed in the annals of legal history.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:27 pm to Strannix
I stated the facts. Make of it what you will, but there is even another case currently before the SCOTUS (that will likely get the same treatment). I just want to be clear about what this means versus what it doesn't mean.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:34 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
So let's keep in mind that there is still a lot of legal wrangling to go on this topic.
Puh-leeze, call it what it really is: Democrat obstruction and obfuscation.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:37 pm to CorporateTiger
#resist even when doesn't make sense
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:38 pm to roadGator
I'm just here stating the facts. I think it will be upheld, but this decision isn't really remarkable
Posted on 10/10/17 at 9:48 pm to CorporateTiger
Well thank god y’all don’t travel overseas. Y’all would be real sad ab this
Don’t upvote me
Don’t upvote me
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 10/10/17 at 10:42 pm to Da Sheik
You may be tired of winning, but I'm not. 
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:03 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
So let's keep in mind that there is still a lot of legal wrangling to go on this topic.
Wrong. The vast majority of legal and constitutional scholars view the travel ban as 100% legal and constitutional.
However in this day and age it's very easy to judge shop and get a lower court ruling to say anything you want.
The lower court judges are embarrassing themselves with their petty activism, everyone knows Trump is going to win on the travel ban 100% because the #resist is politically motivated and left wing activist judges can only stall the inevitable.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:06 pm to IAmReality
Great, that all still means this is going to be going back through another months long round of working its way up the court system. Then SCOTUS could very well just punt it on another procedural ground. These things usually don't ever get wrapped up too cleanly.
Most do, vast majority is an overstatement though
quote:
The vast majority of legal and constitutional scholars view the travel ban as 100% legal and constitutional.
Most do, vast majority is an overstatement though
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:07 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
I stated the facts. Make of it what you will, but there is even another case currently before the SCOTUS (that will likely get the same treatment). I just want to be clear about what this means versus what it doesn't mean.
Annnnnnnd the picking up of the case to automatically dismiss it on a technicality wasn't a statement in of itself?
Posted on 10/10/17 at 11:10 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Annnnnnnd the picking up of the case to automatically dismiss it on a technicality wasn't a statement in of itself?
Not in particular. This ruling on mootness doesn't really set any significant new precedent. Given that new challenges to the new ban were already in the court system, it more just clarifies which cases are important.
My money is still on the SCOTUS punting it on a technical or procedural ground effectively letting the EO run its course or upholding it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News