Started By
Message
locked post

Sooooo....Let's discuss the Constitution.

Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:06 pm
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:06 pm
As it has become obvious that the Constitutional protections provided to the press in the 1st amendment are being used nefariously and with wholesale abandonment of the role that the framers perceived them as playing in 1789, why can't we start regulating the press?

Within the same sentence that the freedom of the press is guaranteed, the free practice of religion is guaranteed.

The free practice of religion is regulated by the government outside of the bindings of the Constitution everywhere and every day.

The second amendment is the most regulated right in the Constitution which is unambiguously provided in the early amendments.

Should we regulate the press or are they better than the rest of us?

Posted by Rockbrc
Attic
Member since Nov 2015
7919 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:09 pm to
They are the loose cannon--
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:10 pm to
Regulate them how?
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13085 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:11 pm to
"As it has become obvious that the Constitutional protections provided to the press in the 1st amendment are being used nefariously..."

Uh, no. And when you compare the Press today to the Press in Early America (1770s to 1810s), today's press is MUCH more honest and lest rumor-infested than our earlier press. The Press the framers were protecting in the FA was pretty rotten by today's understanding of truth and fairness.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39195 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:17 pm to
They are free to print the truth, no matter how damaging it may to the people in charge. They are not free to spread lies and misinformation.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:20 pm to
Free speech is regulated.

Fire in a theater, defamation, etc.

Think of some quantifiable method to measure regulations/exceptions on constitutional rights. Call them "ALUs" - antiliberty units. Figure out what each regulation is worth and add everything up for each of the first 10 amendments.

Have it on my desk Friday morning and we can revisit the discussion.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

As it has become obvious that the Constitutional protections provided to the press in the 1st amendment are being used nefariously and with wholesale abandonment of the role that the framers perceived them as playing in 1789, why can't we start regulating the press?

Within the same sentence that the freedom of the press is guaranteed, the free practice of religion is guaranteed.

The free practice of religion is regulated by the government outside of the bindings of the Constitution everywhere and every day.

The second amendment is the most regulated right in the Constitution which is unambiguously provided in the early amendments.

Should we regulate the press or are they better than the rest of us?



literally hitler.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:23 pm to
Regulate them like the second amendment. It's important for public safety that we regulate certain constitutional rights.

Right?

Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:27 pm to
The framers had no idea that one day there would be the internet and lots of people would use it in a destructive manner so with these changes from 1789 the Constitution should be a living document that we can interpret according to modern standards.

Right?
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45763 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:35 pm to
What if they relable themselves as "political entertainment"?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9904 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:40 pm to
There are already free press exceptions including defamation prohibitions, prohibitions against direct incitement of violence, obscenity laws. Reporters can go to jail for publishing leaked grand jury info & protecting unnamed sources wanted for crimes.

You'd like to add to these?
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 11:43 pm
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:46 pm to
We have to pay a tax in many states to exercise our right to carry a gun, but all kinds of hell was raised bc people had to pay a tax to exercise their right to vote.

Don't even get me started on the 10th Amendment.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

There are already free press exceptions including defamation prohibitions, prohibitions against direct incitement of violence, obscenity laws. Reporters can go to jail for publishing leaked grand jury info & protecting unnamed sources wanted for crimes.

You'd like to add to these?
You're post doesn't count. The OP obviously didn't care to present anything besides vague and abstract ideas to provide any basis for what he is even talking about. So your concrete examples are too much for the confusing OP.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23189 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

direct incitement of violence


Obviously not enforced, see ferguson, Dallas, Baton Rouge
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 7/10/17 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

And when you compare the Press today to the Press in Early America (1770s to 1810s), today's press is MUCH more honest and lest rumor-infested than our earlier press. The Press the framers were protecting in the FA was pretty rotten by today's understanding of truth and fairness.
history is a liberal art and liberal arts are for cucks
Posted by WhopperDawg
Member since Aug 2013
3073 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:25 am to
If you regulate the press welcome to North Korea
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 2:55 am to
quote:

As it has become obvious that the Constitutional protections provided to the press in the 1st amendment are being used nefariously and with wholesale abandonment of the role that the framers perceived them as playing in 1789, why can't we start regulating the press?


Here is a good historical precedent for you.

"...Hitler had the cabinet, in its first post-election meeting on 15 March, draw up plans for an Enabling Act which would give the cabinet legislative power for four years. The Nazis devised the Enabling Act to gain complete political power without the need of the support of a majority in the Reichstag and without the need to bargain with their coalition partners.

Preparations and negotiations[edit]

The Enabling Act allowed the cabinet to enact legislation, including laws deviating from or altering the constitution, without the consent of the Reichstag. Because this law allowed for departures from the constitution, it was itself considered a constitutional amendment. Thus, its passage required the support of two-thirds of those deputies who were present and voting. A quorum of two-thirds of the entire Reichstag was required to be present in order to call up the bill.

The Social Democrats (SPD) and the Communists (KPD) were expected to vote against the Act. The government had already arrested all Communist and some Social Democrat deputies under the Reichstag Fire Decree. The Nazis expected the parties representing the middle class, the Junkers and business interests to vote for the measure, as they had grown weary of the instability of the Weimar Republic and would not dare to resist."

LINK


Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 2:58 am to
quote:

Should we regulate the press or are they better than the rest of us?

literally hitler.


Yup.

You know we have lost our way when someone thinks something like this would be a good idea.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 3:01 am to
quote:

They are free to print the truth, no matter how damaging it may to the people in charge. They are not free to spread lies and misinformation.


Actually, they have to be. The people are supposed to be smart enough and canny enough to figure it out.

Bad citizens are the problem right now. Like you.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 3:02 am to
The press has always been entertainment for profit (for the most part).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram