Started By
Message

re: Solution to the illegal problem

Posted on 2/22/17 at 10:05 am to
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 10:05 am to
Solution: robots.
Posted by crap4brain
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2004
2497 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 10:18 am to
quote:

ARe you really just going to offer an accident policy? Sounds like it. If so, what will be covered and what will be excluded?


Maybe not even have insurance, just a guarantee from the employer that they will cover any medical costs so that workers don't become a burden on the system.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68111 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 10:25 am to
I'm fairly certain that Americans would accept those jobs if unemployment checks didn't last for 99 weeks and there was a limit to handouts and a crack down on social security disability fraud.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140098 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Maybe not even have insurance, just a guarantee from the employer that they will cover any medical costs so that workers don't become a burden on the system.


So self-funded medical care for migrant workers? There goes your $5/hour and insurance is cheaper than $12 an hour idea.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I'm fairly certain that Americans would accept those jobs if unemployment checks didn't last for 99 weeks and there was a limit to handouts and a crack down on social security disability fraud.




They absolutely positively would....my fat arse would pick as much lettuce as possible if I were hungry! I probably wouldn't be physically able to pick enough but I sure the frick would try!!!

We must have the social safety net so we can have employers paying less than their cost of production and not have cardboard shanty towns and the like.

Unemployment is the exception....it is paid for by working people and customers...I know employers like to claim otherwise but I never reached in my pocket and paid an unemployment premium....I passed the costs onto my customers. The costs were part of the costs of employing someone.....it didn't come out of my end...had it been non-existent or $1000 an hour I would have never known the difference other than what I charged customers.

It is far to easy for an employer to pay less than what it costs an employee to produce because we are far to eager to subsidize the production costs of low wage employers....we should call the employer what they are....welfare recipients...because they get more from the current system than the employee does...would you rather be the employer or the employee???
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram