Started By
Message

re: So what will this special prosecutor uncover?

Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:03 pm to
Posted by pleading the fifth
Member since Feb 2006
3897 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Clinton got impeached for getting a bj in the White House.


This revisionist history pisses me off to no end. Clinton did not, in fact, get impeached for getting fellated in the Oval Office. He was impeached for committing perjury.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Awwww.. how sweet, you're back for more. With an alternate angle since the last one didn't work out so well for ya.

Did I not lie about that?

It's OK Bro, I understand you're confused and not very perceptive. Your user name indicates confusion and your posts are verification.
You're being weird.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 11:07 pm
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29678 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

So what will this special prosecutor uncover?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

If Trump becomes a target the federal code requires Mueller to recuse. If he hasn't recused...trump isn't a target.
Well I was referring to Trump as the broad investigation. I should have specified associates, but I was referring to this:
quote:

Uhhhh... This Special Prosecutor has been done investigating President Trump and associates for awhile now.
I've honestly never heard anything of this sort.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63231 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:11 pm to
Hey, whatever happened to the Turkey conspiracy that replaced the Russian conspiracy for about a minute?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

Hey, whatever happened to the Turkey conspiracy that replaced the Russian conspiracy for about a minute?
Well I think that's what is mostly likely to he Flynn's undoing. But the Turkey issue seems specific to Flynn, although besides Manafort, I think this has been the clearest evidence of actual criminal wrongdoing.
Posted by OnTheGeaux
Har Tavor
Member since Oct 2009
3067 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:16 pm to
and I'm honestly not trying to be weird.

You see, most watched this debate exchange and thought it was a joke. Not a joke, foreshadowing. President Trump would have never said that without legal counsel. He has the goods, had them for awhile now thanks to Steve Pieczenik and IC Patriots.

Get woke Bro... just arrange the tea leaves and read them. MSM is brain rot.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63231 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:17 pm to
What was/is the alleged crime with that?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

You see, most watched this debate exchange and thought it was a joke. Not a joke, foreshadowing. President Trump would have never said that without legal counsel.
You make the comment that Mueller's investigation into him and his associates, which didn't even begin until a couple months ago, is done. And you say that this had been publicly announced by people on both sides.

And your support for this is a debate exchange from October, before the election was when held?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

What was/is the alleged crime with that?
He was lobbying for Turkey, and wasn't registered as a foreign agent, which he was required to do by law at the very least. That is a legal issue, without even considering all of issues regarding the relationship.
Posted by OnTheGeaux
Har Tavor
Member since Oct 2009
3067 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:39 pm to
Yes, I made the comment.

Yes, I provided you with a link to pages of politicians saying there is no evidence.

No, I support this from events that have unfolded since June 2015.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

Yes, I provided you with a link to pages of politicians saying there is no evidence.
But you said that they said the investigation is complete. You're referring to statements regarding the specific status of the investigation, regardless of the evidence or lack thereof.

In other words, the investigation may turn up nothing, but that doesn't mean it's done, which is what you explicitly stated and what I'm questioning.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

Personally were it me I would do what I could to restrict his inquiries to what he was supposed to look into, Russian Collusion.

We don't need this guy hiring an army and digging under every rock he can find to charge someone with something.


you go where the facts take you. Trump is fricked and he knows it, he will fire Mueller when he thinks he is getting close.
Posted by ChEgrad
Member since Nov 2012
3279 posts
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:54 pm to
There will be some sort of charge involving mishandling of money in the Trump business, lying under oath by someone, and nothing related to collusion with Russia during the campaign or obstruction - except for the lying under oath yet to occur. These investigations rarely end up with anything related to the original inquiry.
Posted by OnTheGeaux
Har Tavor
Member since Oct 2009
3067 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:02 am to
quote:

what I'm questioning.


I get what you're questioning and I've provided you insight. You're just choosing to be contrary. If not, then prove this inquiry hasn't shifted away from President Trump. The only legitimate proof (which you won't find) will have to have a .gov web address, and fake White House employee leaks don't count.

Anyway, gonna crash. You'll eventually have your Awakening, Until then... I need some rest for my clients that actually pay for wisdom and insight.




Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Uhhhh... This Special Prosecutor has been done investigating President Trump and associates for awhile now. Hell, every politician (left & right) has said so publicly. This ain't about R's being investigated at this point. This inquiry has circled back to good ol' Hillary herself. 
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
24211 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 1:04 am to
They've finally released solid evidence of collusion. And not just with Putin.

Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42874 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Personally were it me I would do what I could to restrict his inquiries to what he was supposed to look into, Russian Collusion.

We don't need this guy hiring an army and digging under every rock he can find to charge someone with something.

This is what burns my buns about this appointment.

You put an army of investigators on something and they WILL find an offense somewhere which they can then use to forge a narrative of conspiracy and make ordinary common sense reactions appear to be a cover-up.

UNLESS he immediately discovers some CRIME to investigate, he should declare 'nothing here - take your political bullshite to congress.'
Posted by GFaceKillah
Welcome to the Third World
Member since Nov 2005
5935 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:54 am to
quote:

You're being weird.



Because he lied.
Posted by OnTheGeaux
Har Tavor
Member since Oct 2009
3067 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:58 am to
You keep thinking that Killa. Whatever it takes to keep you leftist pacified.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram