- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So the employee that shot the robber is in custody
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:51 am
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:51 am
The robber’s charges are pending
LINK
Hypothetical: thugs are stealing your car; you walk out with a nine and unload. Who goes to jail?
LINK
Hypothetical: thugs are stealing your car; you walk out with a nine and unload. Who goes to jail?
22
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:57 am to Padme
Make damned sure the robber never gets to hire a lawyer.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:57 am to Padme
quote:
The robber’s charges are pending
Probably because he's still in the hospital. Hopefully they will charge and not just release per usual.
It is ridiculous, however, that the employee is being held in custody.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:58 am to bluedragon
Who, after being shot, runs back in to get the bag he dropped?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:00 am to Padme
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:26 am to SCLibertarian
Solzhenitsyn is describing current democrat party policy
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:36 am to Padme
Sucky situation. Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store, it’s not, in that moment, a threat of death or injury to someone. If the employee had moved to physically prevent the theft and the thief then threatened the employee, the analysis would be different.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:46 am to Padme
dindu shot by biz owner: GRAND JURY!!
Anyone else shot: Meh, shouldn't have robbed the store!
Anyone else shot: Meh, shouldn't have robbed the store!
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:46 am to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing.
BS!
Sometimes stealing a person's car or other personal property is in effect killing the person who owns that property since the person can no longer do the work necessary to provide for themselves.
That's why in the past a horse thief was hung and looters were shot.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:47 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Well the problem with that is that you are waiting for the thug to use deadly force, at which time it’s too late. If thug is bashing a case violently then how do you know he isn’t fixing to use deadly force? You don’t, therefore it’s appropriate self defense to take action.
The law in DV cases completely follow this logic. A man can put his fist through a wall and be charged with DV, even though he hasn’t touched the woman.
The law in DV cases completely follow this logic. A man can put his fist through a wall and be charged with DV, even though he hasn’t touched the woman.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 10:59 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Should have blown him away before he had an opportunity to leave, then return for his bag.
Dead on the spot, end the guesswork.
Nine bullets make them count.
Dead on the spot, end the guesswork.
Nine bullets make them count.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:01 am to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store,
why couldn't the store owner have just waited until he pulled a weapon and shot at him first?
why couldn't he just shoot a warning shot into the air?
:insert video of store employee complying with robber then being shot to death 30 seconds later:
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 11:03 am
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:22 am to Padme
3+ decades ago I was involved in an altercation and I placed 3 small caliber rounds in the leg/knee of the aggressor.
After the formalities with local LEO the officer provided sound advice.
"Shot to kill because dead men tell no tales".
After the formalities with local LEO the officer provided sound advice.
"Shot to kill because dead men tell no tales".
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:31 am to Padme
But Joetato said a 9mm will blow out your lung.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:41 am to Padme
quote:
Hypothetical: thugs are stealing your car; you walk out with a nine and unload. Who goes to jail?
Well that's not hard. You go to jail and they go to jail.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:45 am to partsman103
quote:
"Shot to kill because dead men tell no tales".
My cousin is a police officer. He told me the same thing. Said if you ever have to shoot someone make sure you kill them as a "dead man can't talk".
Posted on 2/26/24 at 11:47 am to ronricks
The motto is “better to be tried by 12 than carried by six.”
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:05 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing.
horseshite. I can think of 50 exceptions off the top of my head
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:05 pm to Padme
It's upside down and crazy that a criminal in the process of committing robbery somehow should be protected by the law. He put himself in that position, the employee didn't go looking for him.
Posted on 2/26/24 at 12:11 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Another epically stupid comment. Your mental health condition is noted, seek professional help immediately. If someone is willing to steal in public in front of employees then what other illegal actions is he willing to take? Biden voting moron.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News