Started By
Message
locked post

So Obama put the nation at risk? WOW!

Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:07 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53465 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:07 am
Let me see if I'm following this.

1- Dems blame Russia for Hillary not winning.

2- Obama sign an EO that allows the full force of 16 intel agencies to monitor Trump's transition teams and Russia.

3- They discover a past conversation between Flynn and a Russian guy.

4- They withhold that information for well over a month.

5- the whole time the dems are screaming that Flynn puts the nation at risk.

6- Trump is only told days after he is sworn in.

7- Trump moves to find out if Flynn is lying, and then ask for him to resign.


Why would the Obama admin with hold information that put the nations security at risk?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:09 am to
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:10 am to
You're gonna have a rough ride the next few years if this is how you're gonna melt every time Donald has a setback.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:11 am to
Um.... one- they were monitoring the Russian Ambassador (which we always do) and two, Sally Yates informed the White House of Flynn's malfeasance shortly after the inauguration over the objection of James Comey- heck, ratting out Flynn might be the real reason Trump fired her- Congress should look into that to see if its evidence of a cover-up.
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51805 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:11 am to
He's out drumming up funding for social unrest in a massive scale. Its coming.


Book it.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53465 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:12 am to
LOL! That's not a melt. It's actually facts. HAHA!

Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

month. 5- the whole time the dems are screaming that Flynn p


False
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Let me see if I'm following this.


Hint: You're not.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Jjdoc
I don't think you've ever posted something that wasn't at least 70% untrue.

#Fakethreads
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140383 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

He's out drumming up funding for social unrest in a massive scale. Its coming.


Sadly, one cannot discount this.

Conceal carry all the time baws. All the damn time.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53465 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Um.... one- they were monitoring the Russian Ambassador (which we always do) and two, Sally Yates informed the White House of Flynn's malfeasance shortly after the inauguration over the objection of James Comey- heck, ratting out Flynn might be the real reason Trump fired her- Congress should look into that to see if its evidence of a cover-up.



So much verifiable wrongness in this post.

1- Obama signed an EO that directed this. It's been linked here many times... but here you go...

LINK

quote:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed the new rules on January 3rd, after Director of National Intelligence James Clapper approved them in December. President Barack Obama's administration passed the changes in its final days in the White House -- President-elect Donald Trump takes office on January 20th.


quote:

Sally Yates informed the White House of Flynn's malfeasance shortly after the inauguration over the objection of James Comey


NOPE! Even the WaPo states clearly that between the time of Jan 23rd and 30th Comey backed off of that.

Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

LOL! That's not a melt. It's actually facts. HAHA!

It's actually not, but even if it was, my point would still stand.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:17 am to
So your claim is that they hadn't been monitoring the Russian ambassador's communications for years?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53465 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I don't think you've ever posted something that wasn't at least 70% untrue.


Name one thing that's not true in the OP.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:19 am to
Its an attempt to make Trump look incompetent but this will only backfire bigly just like the other attempts.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Name one thing that's not true in the OP.
2 and 4, at minimum.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53465 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

So your claim is that they hadn't been monitoring the Russian ambassador's communications for years?



This is why you come to wrong conclusions. My claim is that Obama signed an EO that placed all 16 agencies on the "Russian" links to Trump's team.

Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:23 am to
Lying to win the election is coming back around to bite Trump. Maneuvering with Russia before Inauguration is breaking the law. Here we go! Wow, what will we have in the next three weeks from this free wheeling administration?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:24 am to
quote:

1- Obama signed an EO that directed this
I hate to break it to you but nobody needed an EO to tap the Russian embassy
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 11:24 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram