- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So according to the sheriff, Paddock was 'radicalized'
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:02 am to BamaFan365
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:02 am to BamaFan365
quote:
tea party?
Lmao
Here you go lil guy:
In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.
In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
In 2009, a left wing radical Islamic sympathizer Major Nidal Hasan fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others on Fort Hood, near Killeen, Texas. The shooting produced more casualties than any other on an American military base.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in the head thus wounding her for life.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.
In Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
In 2016 a registered Muslim Democrat murdered 49 people in an Orlando night club.
In 2017, a disgruntled democrat Steve Hodgkinson shot Congressman Steve Scalise while he was practicing for a bi-partisan baseball game.
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does nothing.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in these shootings and murders.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 8:14 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:03 am to Jake88
quote:
The problem is that you're beyond questioning the truth. It seems you've found your truth.
I mean, if you know the whole truth right now, spit it out.
PLEASE!
His old lady just got back into the states an hour ago.
So, tell us what the truth is...
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:04 am to Errerrerrwere
Yep. All that is ignored
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:08 am to CAD703X
I actually forgot the guy with Steve Scalise dammit!
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:26 am to Errerrerrwere
But the msm told me that tea party was full of radical right wing patriots that want to kill everybody
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:28 am to BamaFan365
But we should believe what they are telling us now, right?
Rotf
Rotf
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:30 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
But we should believe what they are telling us now, right?
Nope
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:37 am to shinerfan
And a lot of Christianshave premarital sex and get abortions. The point is that Paddock and Danley both had lived oriented around something extremely against the faith you are projecting onto them with no evidence.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:39 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
The point is that Paddock and Danley both had lived oriented around something extremely against the faith you are projecting onto them with no evidence.
Link?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:41 am to Errerrerrwere
Where did I claim I knew the truth? All I'm saying is that before people run with goofball theories they should wait. Enough info will leak to get a better picture without having to rely on some half-assed videos.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:46 am to Jake88
quote:
Where did I claim I knew the truth? A
Quit playing the victim now pansy.
Go back and read your post to me with your sarcasm that I knew the whole truth. Well, of you are going to patronize me, how about you tell me wtf is going on then.
quote:
goofball theories
I posted a link to a video with gunfire from the fourth floor. Prove it wrong.
quote:
Enough info will leak to get a better picture without having to rely on some half-assed videos
Blee dat!
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 8:50 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:54 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
And a lot of Christianshave premarital sex and get abortions. The point is that Paddock and Danley both had lived oriented around something extremely against the faith you are projecting onto them with no evidence.
Please link to where I projected anything of the sort onto them. I simply pointed out that you're dead wrong in your claim that Muslims don't gamble.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:59 am to shinerfan
My assertion was a general rule of their faith. There is no behavoir tat is singular enough to apply to a group as wide as "Muslims." A bunch of them I know eat pork and have mistresses. The rule of their faith is gambling is haram.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:07 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
My assertion was a general rule of their faith. There is no behavoir tat is singular enough to apply to a group as wide as "Muslims."
When you responded to the question
quote:
Do Muslims gamble?
with
quote:
Very much not
it sure sounded like an assertion of behavior and not of the tenets of the faith.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:09 am to Errerrerrwere
I'm not playing victim. That's an odd statement. Here's the post you responded to
There is no sarcasm intended. It's quite clear throughout this thread that you are fairly convinced that there was some sort of conspiracy. Don't act like your mind is still open to the idea that this guy acted alone and for an as yet unknown reason. If it was, you wouldn't be so defensive and sensitive.
quote:
quote:
I think I'd rather take the side that questions the truth as of now.
The problem is that you're beyond questioning the truth. It seems you've found your truth.
There is no sarcasm intended. It's quite clear throughout this thread that you are fairly convinced that there was some sort of conspiracy. Don't act like your mind is still open to the idea that this guy acted alone and for an as yet unknown reason. If it was, you wouldn't be so defensive and sensitive.
quote:This is funny and the sign of a gullible person. Proving it was gunfire is what should initially occur.
I posted a link to a video with gunfire from the fourth floor. Prove it wrong.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:11 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:18 am to Jake88
quote:
m not playing victim
Sure you are. That's what you people do.
quote:
That's an odd statement.
No it's not.
quote:
There is no sarcasm intended. It's quite clear throughout this thread that you are fairly convinced that there was some sort of conspiracy
Yes. After I see muzzle fire from the 4th floor.
Do you have any clue what that might be?
quote:
. Don't act like your mind is still open to the idea that this guy acted alone and for an as yet unknown reason. If it was, you wouldn't be so defensive and sensitive.
It's not unless someone can let me know what those flashes in the fourth floor window are. Be honest.
quote:
This is funny and the sign of a gullible person. Proving it was gunfire is what should initially occur.
Prove it wasn't.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:22 am to RobbBobb
When you're 64, you don't become radicalized.
You might use Islam as an excuse for choosing to kill and maim 600 people.
You might use Islam as an excuse for choosing to kill and maim 600 people.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:27 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
When you're 64, you don't become radicalized.
Really. You know the thoughts of every 64 yo now do ya? He might have been intrigued with the thought of 72 virgins. You never know.
quote:
You might use Islam as an excuse for choosing to kill and maim 600 people.
Is this why ISIS claimed him?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:31 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Where did you hear that?
LINK
FFS, more Infowars? What the frick is it with you people and this completely fake bullshite site?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:36 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Yes. After I see muzzle fire from the 4th floor.
Do you have any clue what that might be?
You don't know what you saw and neither do I. You're just a goober looking to feel special about your "unique" knowledge of the situation, or a simpleton who can't imagine anything more reasonable.
quote:
Prove it wasn't.
You made the claim it was gunfire therefore the responsibility rests with you to prove your assertion. That's how this works.
quote:
That's what you people do.
Which people, successful conservatives?
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:37 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News