- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 1/29/14 at 8:41 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Question, would he completely obliterate an opponent in the debates? He seems like a guy who would embarrass his opponent by being waaaay more logical than they could hope to be.
Winning a debate depends completely on your audience. The democrat base is comprised of a majority of the ignorant masses. Paul will not "win" a debate in their eyes.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 8:43 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
Notice I have talked about plans or ideas or problems faced, because none of that matters. What matters is marketing and Randt needs a makeover not even the Queer Eye Fab 5 could accomplish.
Thats a pretty great argument for voting restrictions.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 8:44 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
The democrat base is comprised of a majority of the ignorant masses.
and they easily fall for false promises, over and over.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 8:48 am to TrueTiger
quote:
and they easily fall for false promises, over and over.
In their defense, most lack the cognitive ability to understand long term cause and effect. Both the DNC and the GOP capitalize on this shortcoming. The DNC just does it to a greater degree, with greater efficiently, with a focus on the lowest of the low.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 8:58 am to RollTide4Ever
quote:
Also, his wife will seal the deal.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 11:27 am to GumboPot
What a babe
Posted on 1/29/14 at 11:45 am to RollTide4Ever
I was a big Ron supporter, but I would be the first to admit that he was not an engaging speaker, and that includes both on camera and in person (saw him speak at a Mises event). However, he was extremely engaging in small group settings and one-on-one.
If Rand can combine his father's likability in small groups with solid public speaking capabilities, he can do some serious damage.
If Rand can combine his father's likability in small groups with solid public speaking capabilities, he can do some serious damage.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 11:50 am to RebelExpress38
I love Rand.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 11:52 am to RebelExpress38
At least someone will come out and say the truth about the federal reserve.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 12:59 pm to Joshjrn
I bet he would kill a debate
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:02 pm to RollTide4Ever
quote:not talking about humor, just charisma. Paul needs to step it up
Rand is a funny guy, but this wasn't the time to crack jokes like the old gipper. There's plenty of time for that.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 1:40 pm to RebelExpress38
Thanks for posting! What I love is that he is making it clear - especially to swing voters and younger voters who don't remember Reagan - that there is ANOTHER WAY. He also made it clear, without being mean-spirited that our current president's way hasn't worked very well. Not the most charismatic speaker in the world, but he states his case well and speaks to people like adults. So refreshing after 5+ years of bloviating.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:03 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Winning a debate depends completely on your audience. The democrat base is comprised of a majority of the ignorant masses. Paul will not "win" a debate in their eyes.
Why should republican candidates be concerned with whether democratic voters acknowledge who actually won a debate, they are going to vote for the democratic candidate. That being said, even the crew at MSNBC and other ardent democrats were forced to admit Romney destroyed Obama in the first debate.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:04 pm to deltaland
quote:
Unless the candidate is an extremist evangelical like Santorum.
I agree, yet somehow Santorum finished second in the 2012 Republican primaries, with strong showings in states that don't seem to fit the "evangelical strength" description, like Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, Illinois and Arizona.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 2:08 pm to NHTIGER
quote:
Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, Illinois and Arizona.
These are likely due to his incredibly "free market" idea to allow manufacturing companies in the rust belt a 0% corporate income tax rate.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:03 pm to RebelExpress38
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:09 pm to RebelExpress38
Does not matter who Republicans run in 2016. They have learned absolutely nothing from 2012 and will continue to lose national elections.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:13 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
me who will actually think less of him for having a lot of "faith".
Then these people are very dumb, but that doesn't surprise me. Just because a man has a "lot of faith" doesn't mean he'll push it on others or anything of the sort.
Posted on 1/29/14 at 4:18 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
tinny voice,
Uh, he is a friggin' bass compared to this guy:
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News