Started By
Message
locked post

SCOTUS to decide on Travel Ban today, melt incoming

Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:30 am
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45195 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:30 am
ABC News @ABC
·
8m
SCOTUS expected to decide on whether to take up Trump's travel ban today. What you need to know about politics today (link: LINK ) abcn.ws/2tcp3Xc
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:33 am to
They need to slap down the reasoning behind those ridiculous rulings, goes way beyond the issue at hand.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64590 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:33 am to
Will the 'newest' decision from the 9th affect the ruling?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:35 am to
quote:

melt incoming

From 1 side or the other
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42517 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:35 am to
quote:

hey need to slap down the reasoning behind those ridiculous rulings, goes way beyond the issue at hand.

I hope they bitch slap the 9th Circuit in the most humiliating way that words can convey.

This needs to be 9-0 but of course it will be a lot closer. The wise lesbians will not ever do the right thing.
Posted by PhillipJFry
Member since Sep 2016
962 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:35 am to
Oh boy. Thanks for the heads up.
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:35 am to
quote:

melt incoming


I sincerely hope so
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40090 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:38 am to
quote:

SCOTUS expected to decide on whether to take up Trump's travel ban today.


Get your sandbags ready folks, the melt is gonna flood us all!
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10189 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:44 am to
Good test today for O's axiom "elections have consequences".
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98474 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:45 am to
Expected...
Posted by cardswinagain
Member since Jun 2013
11870 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 6:47 am to
Which way will this ruling go? If it goes in Trump's favor will it be effective immediately?
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 6:48 am
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48895 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:01 am to
quote:

SCOTUS expected to decide on whether to take up Trump's travel ban today.


So they are not ruling on it but just seeing it they need to take it...
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45195 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

So they are not ruling on it but just seeing it they need to take it...


They will decide whether to keep the stay in place during appeals or whether they should allow the implementation
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68039 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:07 am to
That just says they'll decide whether to take the case, not that they'll actually render a decision today.
Posted by OnTheGeaux
Har Tavor
Member since Oct 2009
3067 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:11 am to
I predicted it would happen on this past Friday, off by 1 workday. Guess they didn't want to distract from the Tigahs beating the Beavers.

Prediction

MAGA
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23652 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:18 am to
Just because it may be on a conference schedule doesn't mean that they will decide on cert. Some cases get deferred five or six times before cert is denied.
This post was edited on 6/26/17 at 7:19 am
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27480 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:36 am to
quote:


They will decide whether to keep the stay in place during appeals or whether they should allow the implementation


I think because it is a timed ban and not open ended, they will leave the stay in place while the take it up for arguments. If they remove the stay while it proceeds through arguments then it will have run its course before the court ever renders a decision. Other than setting a precedent for future courts to look back to, their arguments and decision will have been a waste of time if they release the stay.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146550 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has cast the decisive vote in some of the court's most far-reaching decisions, turns 81 next month and is widely believed to be thinking of retiring.

When asked about that, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway told ABC: "I will never reveal a conversation between a sitting justice and the president or the White House, but we're paying very close attention to these last bit of decisions."

One of those decisions could come Monday, if the nine justices are prepared to rule on a White House challenge to lower-court findings blocking Trump's attempt to limit travel from six predominantly Muslim countries.

The court could also delay its recess to allow more time to consider the case, or even put it off to the fall session.

Two federal appeals courts have so far ruled against the travel ban, with one saying it violated laws against religious discrimination and another finding that Trump had exceeded his authority on immigration matters.

The original ban and a later revised order, both blocked by courts, represented one of Trump's most controversial actions. They sparked global condemnation and threw travel from the targeted countries -- Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen -- into turmoil. Iraq was removed in the second version of the ban.

Kennedy, who was appointed to the high court by President Ronald Reagan in 1988, has often cast a "swing" vote from the bench.

He typically sides with conservatives on economic matters, gun control and voting rights, but with liberal justices on social issues like gay rights, the death penalty and abortion.

It was Kennedy who wrote the decision establishing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage nationwide.

Speculation about a Kennedy retirement was sparked partly because he was slow to hire clerks for the court's next term.

If he does step down, Trump would have a chance to deepen his mark on the nation's judiciary with the opportunity to pick another nominee for a lifetime appointment to the bench.

His first nominee, Neil Gorsuch -- once a clerk to Kennedy -- joined the court in April.

Republicans hold a 52-48 majority in the Senate, and under rules they passed to expedite Gorsuch's confirmation they would need only a simple majority to fill the next court vacancy.

But a strongly conservative successor to Kennedy could push the court firmly to the right, and Democrats say they would fight such a pick fiercely.

"I expect Armageddon on the next one," Republican Senator Orrin Hatch said after the Gorsuch confirmation, "because that's going to change... the direction of the court" far into the future.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32089 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:02 am to
Love it or hate it...it's the duty and responsibility of the president to carry it out.

I do not see why foreign nationals on foreign soil have any right to challenge any reason they are refused entry.
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 6/26/17 at 8:04 am to
The ruling from the 9th is an attempt to not be slapped down by the SCOTUS...

It indicates they know what the ruling will be and that some conversations between the courts has taken place.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram