Started By
Message

re: Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming

Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

EPA chief Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming


We're back to "global warming"?? I thought it was "climate change"...or was it "Weather disruption"?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

no he is not

Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

I've seen studies that shows very close correlation between the CFCs (from aerosol cans in the 70s and older air conditioning systems) and global warming.

I thought, back then, those were the cause of the hole in the ozone which was letting all the heat out, causing the coming Ice Age?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Personally I think it's the liberals' construction of safe zones and sanctuary cities as well as the heat island effect that concrete jungles where liberals live and play (they don't really work).

I think you're on to something. When they all start hyperventilating en mass every time they see a happy family or chicken for sale, can you imagine the up tick in C02?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

the sun is entering a minimum activity phase and has been less active for four years now and our global pollution index is elevated its not the sun.

Thats just dumb.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

I should listen to a pundit with no qualifications in either electrical engineering or climatology proclaim the climate to be eternally stable because of a specious analogy to best practices for circuit design?


Of course not. When it comes to issues of science you should let the facts determine your opinion.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

thousands of really, really smart people study this everyday of their lives, you should start listening to them.

Yes, and to get paid they have to support the MAN made warming BS. Not going to get that government or greenie institution grant without towing the party line. Really smart people pitch their studies to the biases of the money sources to win grants. Really smart scientist took tobacco grant money and declared smoking a harmless habit! Really smart scientist are just as human as any old dumb arse walking the street!

Really smart sociologist would say that you are trying to convince people with "jumping on the bandwagon effect". You know, like a six-year-old, "But mom! Everyone is going!"

When their models start accurately predicting climate forward and back, I'll give them more credence.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Yes, and to get paid they have to support the MAN made warming BS.


climatologist make bank dude dont you know. Ot baller type money
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

we havent begun to see the effect of that very fast rise, but its coming.

Wow! I haven't realized until now that man made global warming advocates are like the mirror image copies of adolescent boys!

Boy,"It's ok honey. I promise I won't come!"
Advocate, Trust me! It's coming soon!"
Posted by SlackMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
2653 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I thought, back then, those were the cause of the hole in the ozone which was letting all the heat out, causing the coming Ice Age?


You're right -- that's exactly what they thought at the time. More recent studies using empirical data showed otherwise although I can't remember the thoery the came up with to explain the phenomenon.

It all goes to show that we really don't understand nearly enough to start enacting hugely costly programs, laws, and regulations that curtail our freedoms.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

climatologist make bank dude dont you know. Ot baller type money

Nice deflection attempt!
Doesn't matter how much they make. Even minimum wage earners soon learn the need to follow the person that signs the paycheck.
"Oh I do it this way or I'm fired?" Said that at 14 on my first job.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

I live in the country just outside of town, have my shop at my home, probably 1400 sq ft. and drive maybe 2000 miles a year.


So you're jealous of those who have more and want to make them feel guilty.

Just curious...what is it that you're actually afraid of when it come to your OCD about the weather?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

It's both

Why are you afraid of the weather? What do you imagine will happen?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24578 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww poor wittle thing. is him hurting your global climate change armageddon narrative?



Forgive them lord, their education is low and they know not what they do.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

humans yearly put out the carbon dioxide output of 29000 Mt Saint Helens eruptions i need to edit this, its 29000 Mt St helens eruptions since the industrial revolution all totaled. in other word our current billion tons of C02 yearly human output equals a Mt Saint Helens every 12.3 days.



And yet the temp has risen (with the help of manipulated numbers) .8 of (1) degree in the last 100+ years.
What are you afraid of?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24578 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:25 pm to
Dale you're in every climate change thread saying ridiculously incorrect information. I dunno if you never went to school or took a class concerning this stuff but its very 101 shite. I know you wont but you should seriously get off a south eastern college football message board to get your scientific information or bounce your crazy ideas off people just as uneducated as you are on the subject.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 1:26 pm
Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13609 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

t doesn't, the only factor that has witnessed a reliable trend with rising temperature throughout history is corresponding increase in Co2 concentrations




Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Dale you're in every climate change thread saying ridiculously incorrect information.

Such as what?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24578 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

the only factor that has witnessed a reliable trend with rising temperature throughout history is corresponding increase in Co2 concentrations



Adding pirates to a greenhouse shouldn't decrease the temperature for the plants. I'm not totally sure of that but maybe you should test your hypothesis of pirates. Or were you being retarded?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24578 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Such as what?



I honestly cannot debate you if you just repeat the same stupid questions that have no possible answer. If you're one of the people who thought tucker "schooled" nye then theres no hope. I honestly cannot waste anymore time on people that actively choose not to try and at least have a small understanding of what is going on.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram