- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:06 am to Iosh
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:06 am to Iosh
You should start here. All the models are based on many of the same starting points or a base model which typically originates from NASA's work in the 1980s.
Start here:
LINK /
Start here:
LINK /
2
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:07 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:It isn't.
EPA chief Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming
Not even debatable.
The fact this seems a controversial statement demonstrates just how pathetic our politicized educational process has become.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:08 am to boogiewoogie1978
Time to shut down or majorly scale back EPA.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:30 am to notsince98
I should listen to a pundit with no qualifications in either electrical engineering or climatology proclaim the climate to be eternally stable because of a specious analogy to best practices for circuit design?
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 11:34 am
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:35 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
I would not agree that it's a primary contributor to the global warming that we see
He stated it is not A primary contributor, which is absolutely false
If he had stated it isn't THE primary contributor, then many of the replies in this thread might have more merit
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 11:36 am
Posted on 3/9/17 at 11:35 am to boogiewoogie1978
crony doink
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:24 pm to roadGator
I live in the country just outside of town, have my shop at my home, probably 1400 sq ft. and drive maybe 2000 miles a year.
you have me confused, I only argue this help educate ignorance of the subject. You think I think we can do something about it. Not at all....damage is done brah, within the next century, you kids, your grandkids, your greatgrandkids will be fighting wars for resources because of climate change.
our only hope in the long term to avoid centuries of displacements, starvation is some break thru in energy tech that frees the world of the use of fossil fuels.
thousands of really, really smart people study this everyday of their lives, you should start listening to them.
you have me confused, I only argue this help educate ignorance of the subject. You think I think we can do something about it. Not at all....damage is done brah, within the next century, you kids, your grandkids, your greatgrandkids will be fighting wars for resources because of climate change.
our only hope in the long term to avoid centuries of displacements, starvation is some break thru in energy tech that frees the world of the use of fossil fuels.
thousands of really, really smart people study this everyday of their lives, you should start listening to them.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:25 pm to notsince98
quote:
notsince98
fricking idiot, linking wattsupwiththat, might as well link Lord Monckton
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:26 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
my shop
What kind of shop?
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:31 pm to llfshoals
quote:
and yet we've had very high Concentrations of CO2 and very low temperatures in history. Which renders your theory as so much bullshite.
It cracks you people posting on here think temperatures just rise and fall over short time spans in response to significant environmental changes.
took almost 800k years to go from 300 ppm to 400 ppm co2 naturally the last time it occurred, we, humans, got it done in 55 years.
we havent begun to see the effect of that very fast rise, but its coming.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:31 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:It's both
fricking idiot, linking wattsupwiththat, might as well link Lord Monckton
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:32 pm to roadGator
quote:
What kind of shop?
a coal plant
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:34 pm to Cruiserhog
I don't believe you.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:34 pm to DelU249
quote:
there are 7 billion people on the planet and most of them don't live in the united states or Europe but even if everyone "reduced their carbon footprint" it wouldn't make a difference
unless you want to exterminate all life on the planet.
humans yearly put out the carbon dioxide output of 29000 Mt Saint Helens eruptions
i need to edit this, its 29000 Mt St helens eruptions since the industrial revolution all totaled.
in other word
our current billion tons of C02 yearly human output equals a Mt Saint Helens every 12.3 days.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:35 pm to roadGator
quote:
I don't believe you.
what tipped you off, i gotta work on that
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:35 pm to Cruiserhog
Sounds like what we need is a big ole thinning of the herd. 
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:35 pm to Cruiserhog
Link?
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:36 pm to Cruiserhog
I have a 6th sense. There is nothing more you could have done.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:37 pm to roadGator
quote:
Sounds like what we need is a big ole thinning of the herd.
the funny thing is, the planet tends to have this certain disregard for the life that occupys it. so you you can rest assured you'll get that thinning.
Posted on 3/9/17 at 12:38 pm to BBONDS25
Link?
to what
to what
Page 3 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News