Started By
Message
locked post

Saving the country & Saving SCOTUS - The debt to Mitch McConnell

Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:32 am
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:32 am
Mitch is not that well liked here on the TD poliboard; but he did come through on this & deserves credit.

I was always committed to supporting the Republican nominee, mainly because of THIS issue

I am very thankful to Mitch and Senate Republicans for their commitment and resolve on this issue

The debt to Mitch McConnell

quote:

No other consideration drove conservatives to Donald Trump like the prospect of a U.S. Supreme Court dedicated to preserving the Constitution as it was written and honored for centuries. The Donald promised to appoint judges in the mold of the late Antonin Scalia to the seat vacated by Mr. Scalia’s death.

Mr. Trump can redeem that promise when he first takes office on Jan. 20 next year, thanks in good measure to Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate majority leader who announced on the death of Judge Scalia that the majority of the Senate would defer action on President Obama’s proposed replacement until after the November election, and rallied his colleagues to keep the pledge.

Mr. McConnell, who is sometimes scolded by conservatives as insufficiently resolute, withstood pressure from the Democrats and their media allies, particularly after the president nominated Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, to fill the Scalia vacancy. Liberal pressure groups turned up the heat on Republican senators facing tough re-election campaigns, demanding that Judge Garland be confirmed at once.

Certain Republican senators, who sometimes wilt and wobble under pressure, fretted that the pledge to block the Garland nomination might be unwise because Hillary Clinton looked like a winner and it might be better to confirm Judge Garland now because a prospective President Clinton wouldn’t nominate anyone better. Keeping senators in line is always a test for a majority leader; it’s a chore like herding cats. But Sen. McConnell stood firm.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32764 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:34 am to
LOL, McConnell deserves no credit for this whatsoever. It was a no-brainer, you hold off on the confirmation of Garland until the election results. If Hillary wins, you confirm him. If Trump wins, you don't.
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:35 am to
I'll admit, I thought it was a questionable to poor decision at the time.
Posted by OldHickory
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2012
10602 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:35 am to
McConnell is a mess. He's a waste. Total swamp creature.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29166 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:36 am to
quote:

It was a no-brainer, you hold off on the confirmation of Garland until the election results.


If Scalia had died in say September, sure.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98787 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:37 am to
Even if any debt is owed...if he pisses it away by not going nuclear on SC nominees, it won't matter.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Even if any debt is owed...if he pisses it away by not going nuclear on SC nominees, it won't matter.


I agree with this

we have 53 solid votes that I know of (the Dem Senator from WV)

any thoughts on where we get 7 more?

I am 100% behind the "nuclear option" for SCOTUS nominees - we can reshape the judiciary & we need to go ahead and do it
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81735 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:43 am to
I thought about making this thread myself - I'm shocked he pulled it off

Those of you acting like it wasn't ballsy as hell are being dishonest
This post was edited on 11/23/16 at 9:44 am
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:48 am to
quote:

I thought about making this thread myself - I'm shocked he pulled it off

Those of you acting like it wasn't ballsy as hell are being dishonest


absolutely

Garland was in no way the "worst" person we could have gotten from the left & we did have the protection of a Senate majority

odds are that Hillary would have renominated Garland (she was running on preserving Obama's legacy), so there wasn't as much at stake as there could have been

BUT, the repercussions on us if she had won and the Senate had gone dem were likely to be YUGE (you may have noticed that leftists can be pretty vindictive)

Not a big fan of Mitch most of the time, but he did us righteous with this one!
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:48 am to
Mitch is garbage. OP must be a child.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26962 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Even if any debt is owed...if he pisses it away by not going nuclear on SC nominees, it won't matter.


I agree with this

we have 53 solid votes that I know of (the Dem Senator from WV)

any thoughts on where we get 7 more?


Easy. You don't need to go nuclear. Just look at the Dems up for reelection in 2018:

Montana
Ohio
Indiana
Florida
Missouri
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Michigan
Pennsylvania
North Dakota

You can find enough from that list to understand that it would be political suicide to filibuster...especially Montana, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri, and North Dakota.
Posted by LSUROXS
Texas
Member since Sep 2006
7153 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:50 am to
I said this on election night. Mitch came through and did not cave to intense pressure from all sides.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

quote:
Even if any debt is owed...if he pisses it away by not going nuclear on SC nominees, it won't matter.


I agree with this

we have 53 solid votes that I know of (the Dem Senator from WV)

any thoughts on where we get 7 more?


Easy. You don't need to go nuclear. Just look at the Dems up for reelection in 2018:

Montana
Ohio
Indiana
Florida
Missouri
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Michigan
Pennsylvania
North Dakota

You can find enough from that list to understand that it would be political suicide to filibuster...especially Montana, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri, and North Dakota.




great point!

I do think we should go "nuclear" if we have to, but it would be better if we don't

winning and making the country better is the goal, ratcheting down the divisiveness & rhetoric would be helpful

but again, if we cannot - well, frick 'em
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
12934 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 9:54 am to
McConnell finally benefits from his standard pose of not doing jack shite.

No thanks. frick him.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:11 am to
Mitch gave in 99 times, and held ground once.

I'm not ready to clap.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112475 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:17 am to
He deserves no credit. He was under intense pressure from the right.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29685 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

He deserves no credit. He was under intense pressure from the right.


maybe - but this once he did the right thing

blind squirrel

acorn

don't care

happy about this
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24750 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 10:57 am to
McConnell is a scumbag, and he's not the only one that's a R.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 11:35 am to
Mitch McConnell is a piece of shite. I hope he gets a Clinton special very soon.
Posted by CaptChandler
Polis
Member since Sep 2016
2427 posts
Posted on 11/23/16 at 11:41 am to
Yes he is, but I'd say Harry Reid is a much bigger POS.

quote:

I hope he gets a Clinton special very soon.


Now this is uncalled for. You've officially revealed yourself as a hyper-partisan, intolerant POS.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram