Started By
Message

re: Russia is starting to speak about Baltic countries as it did about Ukraine

Posted on 10/1/14 at 2:57 pm to
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81590 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Why would the West bail out Russia AFTER he invades the Baltics? That doesn't make any sense at all. He would confiscate the hard currency assets of the countries he invaded.


My thinking was that he'd be negotiating from a position of extreme power then. We'd literally be starting WWIII to do anything other than settle or negotiate sanctions. And we couldn't really "punish" the Baltic nations by allowing Russia's finances to drag down their economies as well.

I don't see what Putin has to lose if Russia's current financial landscape is as bleak as you say it is? He'd be immensely popular in Russia for acting strong and what's his downside?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81590 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Bush: I looked in his eyes and saw his soul.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

He would confiscate the hard currency assets of the countries he invaded.


the baltics are not exactly awash in wealth though. They have fared better than some of the other former soviet bloc but are still relatively poor.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

We'd literally be starting WWIII to do anything other than settle
Settle....WHAT? "Please, Mr. Putin, don't invade anymore countries! Here's some money for your troubles."

Maybe I'm tired but you aren't making sense to me.

Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81590 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Settle....WHAT? "Please, Mr. Putin, don't invade anymore countries! Here's some money for your troubles."


I don't see why that's so hard to believe, Russkie. We didn't help Ukraine so why would we help others if military action became a necessity?

I honestly think our true "red line" would be Finland or the Czech. I feel like everything else Putin could grab without military retaliation. Those countries aren't "European enough" to garner support in "Old Europe/Western Europe" for those liberal pacifist nations to retaliate.

Just my opinion, I could be wrong. But I think much like Hitler could have gotten away with his initial few forays and land grabs, Putin could pretty much regain the Soviet Union's old land mass without a full scare war.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

I don't see why that's so hard to believe
Believe WHAT???

Hard to believe that Putin wants to invade the Baltics?? Is that what you're saying?

If so, did you even read the OP??? That's the point of this thread.

Now what was all that "negotiating" crap you were referring to?

There would be no negotiating. If Russia attacked the Baltics, NATO would either defend those countries militarily or it wouldn't. There would be nothing to negotiate.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

US Sends 'Ironhorse' Tanks To NATO's Nervous Baltic Front Line

(Reuters) - U.S. troops and tanks will deploy across the three Baltic states and Poland in the next two weeks on a mission designed to deliver an unmistakeable message of NATO resolve to Moscow.

The "Ironhorse" armored cavalry unit, with around 700 soldiers, some 20 M1A1 Abrams main battle tanks with Bradley and Stryker armored fighting vehicles, is one of the most formidable U.S. military forces to be sent onto former Soviet soil. Several of the bases and training areas it will operate from were built for the old Soviet Red Army.

The aim is to convince Moscow that - unlike in non-NATO Ukraine - any Russian interference in Lithuania, Latvia or Estonia would put it at war with the Western alliance.
Business Insider, October 1, 2014
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81590 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:25 pm to

I said I agree that he'll invade. I'm saying that NATO will capitulate and negotiate with him rather than responding militarily.

Dude you seem like you're going to have a coronary or something - chillax and smoke some mid-grade or drink some red wine
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 3:26 pm
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11476 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Wow. Did anyone not see this coming? Well, other than Obama and company.


Romney definitely did. The libs joked about it.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:30 pm to
This is easy. If troops attack a nato country then it's war with nato. The United states has a battle hardened militarily. russia...heh...Not So much.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 4:06 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Dude you seem like you're going to have a coronary or something -
I don't suffer fools very well.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

SirWinston


Is that the best you can do? Really?
Maybe your next alter will be more clever.
Posted by Edearl Watson
Parts Unknown
Member since May 2012
6782 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Romney definitely did. The libs joked about it.




LINK
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

US Sends 'Ironhorse' Tanks To NATO's Nervous Baltic Front Line

(Reuters) - U.S. troops and tanks will deploy across the three Baltic states and Poland in the next two weeks on a mission designed to deliver an unmistakeable message of NATO resolve to Moscow.


Good.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24953 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:20 pm to
If Finland gets dragged into something the US maritime industry is going to suffer greatly. They manufacture tons of stuff used all over the inland waterways.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Good.
No one will say shite about Obama showing force. But he did.

And you really wish you could talk about how bad arse flexing our muscle makes you feel, but you can't. Cause Obama is the one doing it.

This board would be covered in semen if Romney were president and this was a story.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

If Finland gets dragged into something the US maritime industry is going to suffer greatly. They manufacture tons of stuff used all over the inland waterways.


No offense but we go to war with Russia, the Finnish support of the US maritime industry is not really a huge concern of mine.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Of course the Baltics are all in NATO. The question is does Putin care about that?
Yes, he cares. The political calculus he performs might lead him to conclude that NATO will do nothing in response to Russian acts of war, but he at least has to weigh the risks that NATO will respond.

If NATO lives up to its principles and all members mobilize there is no way that Russia could prevail in a war fought with conventional weapons. Russia would be looking at a multiple front war fought against economies that dwarf its own.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

If NATO lives up to its principles and all members mobilize there is no way that Russia could prevail in a war fought with conventional weapons.
This. It would be an absolute blood bath.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 4:29 pm to
Hell, if the CIA was doing its job, they'd be working to foment some kind of Islamic unrest like desecration of the Koran or blaspheming Muhammad, that would attract the radicals like ISIS & Al Qaeda to wage holy war against Russia. Russia has over 11 million Muslims inside it borders and its southern borders are primarily populated by Muslim countries.

Wouldn't be the 1st time that we've fabricated unrest inside of another country. Hell, they could chop of a few heads of some Russians or maybe blowup one of those fancy Orthodox churches. And there had to be a lot of Muslims on the Malaysian airline that the rebels shot down.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 4:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram