Obama's "substance" began and ended with "what we've done has been really great and we'll do more of the same."
Unfortunately, as Romney aptly pointed out, "but you've been president for FOUR years." No one but the useful leftist idiots believe that what he's done has been really good, so please excuse those that found his substance lacking.
I agreed with some of Romney's vision and disagreed with some. I disagree with all of Obama's vision, his policies and his "substance". Thus, I am an enthusiastic Romney supporter when I otherwise wouldn't be.
Obama did not really have to do much to win in substance really. Just stating his tax plan is balanced with cuts and revenue increases was sufficient in all honesty. And this is only because Romney backtracked on his own plan and still could not explain anything about it.
Mitt's elect me and we will come up with a plan and how we will accomplish these ideals just won't cut it for me. It shouldn't cut it for anyone, but I understand most of the Romney vote right now is just an anti-Obama vote, not an actual vote for anything Romney stands for. Especially considering that no one has any idea what Romney stands for or his actual plan a month away from the election.