Therefore if Obama had sat there the entire debate scratching his arse or nuts, he would have won by default on the substance in my book.
That is weak sauce, dude. Romney straight called him on items he's caved on or outright flipped on, and he didn't engage.
I'm not even saying that Romney did
win on substance. I am saying that Obama most certainly
Both of these guys suffer & benefit from their lack of substance- the difference is that one of them has a record as President that sucks and is hard to defend. But to "win on substance" (except to you I guess,) he has to defend it.
This post was edited on 10/4 at 5:26 pm