- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Republican Talking Points: Are We Still Calling it Muh Russians....
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:28 pm
...if Trump has officially acknowledged that Russians meddled in the election?
I personally do not believe Trump or his team colluded with Russian officials. However, hasn't the "Muh Russians" narrative always revolved around the denial by Trump supporters that Russia interfered with our election process?
To me, it wasn't so much finding out Trump or his team's involvement, it was the curiosity of finding out HOW Russia meddled with the election (be it spreading fake news or trying to hack into election servers).
At this point, to continue to refer to this as "Muh Russians" is to deny that Russia interfered at all, which even Trump has now acknowledged as fact.
Downvote away GOP friends!
I personally do not believe Trump or his team colluded with Russian officials. However, hasn't the "Muh Russians" narrative always revolved around the denial by Trump supporters that Russia interfered with our election process?
To me, it wasn't so much finding out Trump or his team's involvement, it was the curiosity of finding out HOW Russia meddled with the election (be it spreading fake news or trying to hack into election servers).
At this point, to continue to refer to this as "Muh Russians" is to deny that Russia interfered at all, which even Trump has now acknowledged as fact.
Downvote away GOP friends!
16
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:30 pm to Dignan
quote:
To me, it wasn't so much finding out Trump or his team's involvement, it was the curiosity of finding out HOW Russia meddled with the election
My, how the narrative evolves.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:30 pm to Dignan
quote:Sounds like CNN, complete with giving the Democrat candidate debate questions..
fake news or trying to hack into election
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:31 pm to Dignan
quote:
However, hasn't the "Muh Russians" narrative always revolved around the denial by Trump supporters that Russia interfered with our election process?
No, but the success of their meddling is akin to South Africans...
Who the frick cares, they do it every day, and they suck at it.
The narrative that potentially Russians affected something is dumb.
So what instance of meddling are you referring to?
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:32 pm to goldenbadger08
Yeah sorry if we dont care if and how Russia meddled in the election when the DNC rigged their primaries and tried to rig the election themselves. Self reflect a bit and try to figure out why we don't give a frick about the Russians
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:32 pm to goldenbadger08
This is nothing new - the Russians always try to influence our elections. So does china. So did CNN NBC FOX
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:34 pm to NashvilleTider
And obama did it to israel
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:34 pm to IceTiger
The cyberattacks.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:34 pm to Dignan
putting "muh" before another term just shows ignorance and immaturity.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:35 pm to Dignan
It doesn't matter. They'll find some reason to continue to support him. I think blaming it on Obama is the plan.
Trump drives over golf course green:
- "he owns it - he can do whatever he wants"
Had he not owned it
-"he's making golfers melt. So alpha! So MAGA! frick those other guys."
Had he avoided driving over it
-"we finally have a president with class"
It truly doesn't matter.
Trump drives over golf course green:
- "he owns it - he can do whatever he wants"
Had he not owned it
-"he's making golfers melt. So alpha! So MAGA! frick those other guys."
Had he avoided driving over it
-"we finally have a president with class"
It truly doesn't matter.
This post was edited on 6/24/17 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:36 pm to Dignan
Honestly, the problem is the narrative...when it should be:
The DNC destroyed Sanders chances
And Podesta colluded with the media, CIA and other governmental organizations to rig debates, and coordinate fraud against voters.
This is why the D party sucks, they don't even address the problem...and those that do try end up being robbed for nothing and whacked.
You guys don't even care...that's what Americans in general are pissed at the DNC.
The DNC destroyed Sanders chances
And Podesta colluded with the media, CIA and other governmental organizations to rig debates, and coordinate fraud against voters.
This is why the D party sucks, they don't even address the problem...and those that do try end up being robbed for nothing and whacked.
You guys don't even care...that's what Americans in general are pissed at the DNC.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:36 pm to Dignan
quote:
However, hasn't the "Muh Russians" narrative always revolved around the denial by Trump supporters that Russia interfered with our election process?
More like to what level.
The insinuation that the only possible way trump won is because of muh Russians is what "muh Russians" makes fun of
So what was it? Stole, hacked, influenced, or meddled?
This post was edited on 6/24/17 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:37 pm to TigerChief10
quote:
Self reflect a bit and try to figure out why we don't give a frick about the Russians
But calling it "muh Russians" denies that Russians had any involvement and makes it sound like a hoax, which President Trump even acknowledges now as fact.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:38 pm to Dignan
quote:
To me, it wasn't so much finding out Trump or his team's involvement, it was the curiosity of finding out HOW Russia meddled with the election (be it spreading fake news or trying to hack into election servers).
Unless you mean to you, as in, you individually... if this this your perception of the coverage, then
This post was edited on 6/24/17 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:38 pm to Dignan
Russians did less "election meddling" than behind the scenes machinations by the DNC and their co-conspirators in the media.
It is a big Nothingburger. Only a ridiculous person wouldn't see that by now.
It is a big Nothingburger. Only a ridiculous person wouldn't see that by now.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:39 pm to Dignan
Spin class is on the fitness board, Sally.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:40 pm to a want
quote:
It doesn't matter. They'll find some reason to continue to support him. I think blaming it on Obama is the plan.
Agreed, they can be highly hypocritical. However, and I hate to say it, but Obama should shoulder some of the blame for doing nothing about it.
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:41 pm to Loserman
YOU don't like it, so we will continue to do it. MUH RUSSIANS!!!!!!!
Posted on 6/24/17 at 1:42 pm to Dignan
Yeah, they were afraid of it appearing as if they were tipping the scales in HRCs favor
Great Wapo story about it on front page
Great Wapo story about it on front page
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News