Started By
Message
locked post

Rawstory - Trump speech to NATO close to a disaster -

Posted on 5/25/17 at 4:56 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 4:56 pm
This was a big fail.

LINK /

Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167247 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 4:57 pm to
It was only a big fail if you wanted Trump to lie and not call out those not contributing and asking us to foot the bill.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99001 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 4:57 pm to
I read it, it's a bigger reach than Hillary for President in 2020.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140424 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 4:59 pm to
Rawstory...

That hard hitting liberal media outlet that has this headline on their front page about 20 seconds ago...

quote:

JK Rowling calls Trump a ‘tiny, tiny, tiny little man’


You libs would be better off just posting "I hate Trump" all day. At least you wouldn't need shitty sources and you'd be truthful.
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 5:06 pm
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62436 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:00 pm to
That was a great speech. Someone finally told them to pay their share of their own protection....They have used us for their defense, while we payed the bills, and they want to stick Muh Russia in there at the end???? Article sucks!
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65086 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:00 pm to
Yeah, no. I disagree with the article's premise and your username tells me all I need to know about you.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46074 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

This was a big fail.



I now what you're doing, you're trying to take a want's record for most down votes in one thread.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99001 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:04 pm to
How does a want have the record?

His name was Rex.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:04 pm to
Call out those not paying their share. Do it. No problem. But reassert your faith in Article 5 so as not to give Russia, China, Iran or anyone else any ideas. This is just basic defense stuff!
Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
23306 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:05 pm to
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
7961 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:05 pm to
he did what should have been done years ago.

melt bich
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140424 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:05 pm to
No.

Rex was his name.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

out those not paying their share. Do it. No problem. But reassert your faith in Article 5 so as not to give Russia, China, Iran or anyone else any ideas. This is just basic defense stuff!
you guys have become such a fricking joke
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:10 pm to
You're brainwashed...but maybe I missed something?
What elements or suggested changes made it a "big fail"?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140424 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:13 pm to
Another hard hitting story from Rawstory...

quote:

What will Melania Trump talk about with NATO spouses?


Pathetic

Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15047 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:14 pm to
Big Fail for not aggressively reasserting the principle of Article 5.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17031 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:15 pm to
Breaking news: Some rando at some D.C. "think tank" is mad at Trump.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44017 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Trump’s refusal to endorse Article 5 has rendered his entire foreign policy trip a “failure.”

His entire trip?
I've noted several positives to it.
I doubt it was perfect; but from what I've seen, some good will come as a result of their travels.

But what do I know?

This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 5:24 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Big Fail for not aggressively reasserting the principle of Article 5.

Can you explain what you mean and why, without that, anything else is a "big fail"?
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 5:20 pm to
So the president has an obligation to constantly reaffirm an agreement that we signed 5 decades ago? Why must this happen and who is it that needs this constant reminder?

I'm fairly positive literally everyone is aware of the Art 5 obligation, seeing as it's backbone of NATO
What a stupid, stupid article
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 5:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram