- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
President Trump says he might sign 'brand new order' on immigration
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:01 pm
LINK
quote:
President Trump said Friday he is considering signing a "brand new order" on immigration and refugees.
Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that issuing a new executive order "very well could be" a solution to having the order blocked by the courts.
"We will win that battle. The unfortunate part is that it takes time statutorily, but we will win that battle. We also have a lot of other options, including just filing a brand new order," Trump said.
The president, en route to Mar-a-Lago for the weekend, said his administration may be ready to announce their decision on how to proceed as early as Monday or Tuesday.
3
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:02 pm to cajunangelle
Make it tougher this time, so when the old one comes back, they'll be happy.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:06 pm to cajunangelle
If immigration is truly as big of a security concern as he says it is, why is the Trump admin waiting any time at all to release a new EO?
You can't have it both ways. Either it's an immediate threat (warranting a 90 day ban) or it isn't.
You can't have it both ways. Either it's an immediate threat (warranting a 90 day ban) or it isn't.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:10 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
President Trump says he might sign 'brand new order' on immigration
The simplest solution while the original order is tied up in litigation. In fact, just keep issuing EO that the liberals will contest to force them to spend millions of dollars on legal fees.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:13 pm to cahoots
quote:
If immigration is truly as big of a security concern as he says it is, why is the Trump admin waiting any time at all to release a new EO?
If I had to guess, I'd say they were going to make this one air tight. You can't just whip that sort of thing up in a few hours.
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:14 pm to GurleyGirl
quote:
In fact, just keep issuing EO that the liberals will contest to force them to spend millions of dollars on legal fees.
Right, because our tax money isn't also wasted in the process.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:20 pm to MoarKilometers
He's probabaly waiting on Sessions to get in the seat and personally be involved in crafting this. And ensure they have a competent set of lawyers at DOJ who will actually defend it properly, unlike the shite show the last lawyer put on in the 9th Circuit.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:24 pm to cahoots
quote:
If immigration is truly as big of a security concern as he says it is, why is the Trump admin waiting any time at all to release a new EO?
You can't have it both ways. Either it's an immediate threat (warranting a 90 day ban) or it isn't.
i mean the 9th Circuit literally just issued its ruling a couple days ago
if they're going to craft a new EO, it's going to be based around that decision i'd imagine
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh I understand it takes time and the trump admin has other things to accomplish. I'm just saying that if there were an immediate high risk threat, they would find a way to issue something, well, immediately.
It's kinda like:
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE
Now excuse me why I play golf with Japan in Florida
It's kinda like:
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE
Now excuse me why I play golf with Japan in Florida
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:32 pm to cahoots
or they learned the lesson of how their opponents will use (abuse?) the courts and are making sure the next one sticks. no reason to rush something out just for the sake of political expediency that will ultimately fail like the last one did. that wouldn't serve the purpose of protecting America, either
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I agree with your pouin. I'm just suggesting that the threat level is being exaggerated.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:37 pm to cahoots
oh i know what you're trying to get at, but it still doesn't make political sense given what happened the past week. assume that Trump and his admin truly think that the EO is needed for national security issues. rushing out another EO will just severely increase the risk of it having the same story run out, which doesn't serve the purpose of protecting the US.
the better "gotcha" is to go for the political talking point that will be developed about his incompetency, ie, "Trump showed he's not a good President because he already fricked up a major act as President that was a primary part of his campaign strategy. his admin is a joke and has no idea how to govern" etc
the better "gotcha" is to go for the political talking point that will be developed about his incompetency, ie, "Trump showed he's not a good President because he already fricked up a major act as President that was a primary part of his campaign strategy. his admin is a joke and has no idea how to govern" etc
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:40 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
If I had to guess, I'd say they were going to make this one air tight. You can't just whip that sort of thing up in a few hours.
And this time with an AG in place, they won't have a craptoid derelict DOJ lawyer. It makes you wonder if: the DOJ lawyer on that phone call with the judges was an Obama leftover-- and he acted like Forrest Gump on purpose?
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:41 pm to cahoots
You are such a drama queen...get back in your safe space fragile flake.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:53 pm to cahoots
quote:
I agree with your pouin. I'm just suggesting that the threat level is being exaggerated.
Watch this Video. 800 refugees have gotten in since the ninth took over as the executive role and stopped POTUS Trump.
Just from Syria alone, this is a matter of national security.
See the OSU terrorist attack.
Also: Why did Obama get away with banning the Christian refugees from entering America? They are not a terrorist threat...Yet, he let terrorist threats in. Explain this...
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:54 pm to _Hurricane_
quote:
they'll be happy.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:06 pm to scormi5
quote:
He's probabaly waiting on Sessions to get in the seat and personally be involved in crafting this. And ensure they have a competent set of lawyers at DOJ who will actually defend it properly, unlike the shite show the last lawyer put on in the 9th Circuit.
If he had two brain cells to rub together, he'd have done this the first time. The whole implementation last time was a shite show. Whoever advised him should be fired yesterday.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:08 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Right, because our tax money isn't also wasted in the process
How so, those attorneys are already on staff?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News