Started By
Message
locked post

Prehistoric Man May Have Migrated To North America 100,000yrs Earlier Than Thought

Posted on 4/29/17 at 4:06 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123898 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 4:06 pm
Previous estimates had man arriving on this continent ~30Kyrs ago. Some findings had suggested arrival as early as 50Kyrs ago.

However, a recent California dig uncovered a 130,000yr/old site with mastodon bones showing strong evidence of human predation.

Pretty big find if verified
quote:

nature

A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA


Steven R. Holen1,2, Thomas A. Deméré2, Daniel C. Fisher3,4, Richard Fullagar5, James B. Paces6, George T. Jefferson7, Jared M. Beeton8, Richard A. Cerutti2, Adam N. Rountrey3, Lawrence Vescera7 & Kathleen A. Holen1,2

The earliest dispersal of humans into North America is a contentious subject, and proposed early sites are required to meet the following criteria for acceptance: (1) archaeological evidence is found in a clearly defined and undisturbed geologic context; (2) age is determined by reliable radiometric dating; (3) multiple lines of evidence from interdisciplinary studies provide consistent results; and (4) unquestionable artefacts are found in primary context1,2. Here we describe the Cerutti Mastodon (CM) site, an archaeological site from the early late Pleistocene epoch, where in situ hammerstones and stone anvils occur in spatio-temporal association with fragmentary remains of a single mastodon (Mammut americanum). The CM site contains spiral-fractured bone and molar fragments, indicating that breakage occured while fresh. Several of these fragments also preserve evidence of percussion. The occurrence and distribution of bone, molar and stone refits suggest that breakage occurred at the site of burial. Five large cobbles (hammerstones and anvils) in the CM bone bed display use-wear and impact marks, and are hydraulically anomalous relative to the low-energy context of the enclosing sandy silt stratum. 230Th/U radiometric analysis of multiple bone specimens using diffusion–adsorption–decay dating models indicates a burial date of 130.7 ± 9.4 thousand years ago. These findings confirm the presence of an unidentified species of Homo at the CM site during the last interglacial period (MIS 5e; early late Pleistocene), indicating that humans with manual dexterity and the experiential knowledge to use hammerstones and anvils processed mastodon limb bones for marrow extraction and/or raw material for tool production. Systematic proboscidean bone reduction, evident at the CM site, fits within a broader pattern of Palaeolithic bone percussion technology in Africa3–6, Eurasia7–9 and North America10–12. The CM site is, to our knowledge, the oldest in situ, well-documented archaeological site in North America and, as such, substantially revises the timing of arrival of Homo into the Americas.

LINK
Posted by _Hurricane_
Somewhere
Member since Feb 2016
4455 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 4:08 pm to

This post has been marked unreadable!

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123898 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

And the Germans invaded Poli Talk about 70 years later than previously thought.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11089 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 4:41 pm to


Many thanks for the info
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123898 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Many thanks for the info
I thought the 130,000yBP estimate was fascinating, considering African origin of Cro-Mangon (Homo Sapiens) was only estimated at 100K-200K yrs ago
Posted by PygmalionEffect
Member since Jul 2012
4834 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

130,000yr/old site showing strong evidence of human predation.




If my math is correct,that's 6,000 in Christian years.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17020 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Previous estimates had man arriving on this continent ~30Kyrs ago. Some findings had suggested arrival as early as 50Kyrs ago.


All estimates have the first humans entering America about 14,000 years ago. Not sure where they got the previous 30k and 50k estimates.

As for the new find, I will need to see more proof. A date of 130k completely destroys everything we know about human evolution. UNLESS, these humans were not human at all, but were Neanderthals or some other archaic species.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123898 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

Not sure where they got the previous 30k and 50k estimates.
Admittedly "they" didn't. I did. I was just posting from recollection.
But 50KyBP appears accurate . . . . November 18, 2004 -- New Evidence Puts Man In North America 50,000 Years Ago ( LINK)


This post was edited on 4/30/17 at 4:08 am
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13496 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:11 pm to
Operative word:

MAY!

Look mom, we got published with no real proof!

Find some bones guys.
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:13 pm to
They were not human. They were the last of Gods creation that most resembled the creation made in his image....aka humans. They existed for over a million years before he created modern man in his image 6000 years ago. Thank you for your consideration.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Previous estimates had man arriving on this continent ~30Kyrs ago. Some findings had suggested arrival as early as 50Kyrs ago.

However, a recent California dig uncovered a 130,000yr/old site with mastodon bones showing strong evidence of human predation.

Pretty big find if verified
I've had this flagged to dig into all week (pun intended). Agree, pretty big deal if substantiated. Upends a lot of conventional wisdom about early humans and our migration.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71604 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

6000 years ago




My SiL believes this nonsense, too.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

My SiL believes this nonsense, too.
Funny thing is you can absolutely be a believer and still recognize how fricking retarded it is to claim that humans are 6,000 years old.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16096 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:21 pm to
The thing is he had a more sophisticated vocabulary than our POTUS.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61270 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Prehistoric Man May Have Migrated To North America 100,000 yrs Earlier Than Thought
It was my in-laws. They were looking for my house so they could save a few dollars on a motel bill.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6080 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:26 pm to
S. Cal? Unless they have nose rings and arse tattoos, this is a hoax.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123898 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

've had this flagged to dig into all week (pun intended). Agree, pretty big deal if substantiated. Upends a lot of conventional wisdom about early humans and our migration.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:27 pm to
That was a dickish post, but how the hell was that whacked?
Posted by martiansgohome
Maryland
Member since Feb 2004
4650 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:30 pm to
You mean Native Americans may have taken their land from somebody before the white man took it from them?
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3598 posts
Posted on 4/29/17 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

revises the timing of arrival of Homo into the Americas.
Until this, I thought it began with Liberace.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram