- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Politico: The Benghazi-Industrial Complex
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:32 am to a want
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:32 am to a want
quote:
8 years as Senator from NY
She was my senator for 8 years. During that time period she sat on the following committees:
Committe on budget (spending went up)
Armed services committee (wars went up)
Environment and Public works (not sure what was accomplished here)
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (judging from the responses on this board from the younger set, Education certainly didn't get better)
Special committee on aging (winner! she definately looks older)
During her tenure, she was the worst of both Republican and Democrat stereotypes: She voted in favor of almost every military action and voted against keeping the budget in check, while voting for higher taxes.
quote:
4 years as Sec. of State
Kudos to her for getting appointed. Biggest accomplishment seems to have been a complete disaster in Libya?
quote:
not to mention 8 years as first lady
So now being married to the President is an accomplishment?
0
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:32 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
This scandal is a nothingburger,
From a military standpoint, I think it's a big fricking deal. If your standard grunt thinks his leaders regard them as expendable for political expediency, how motivated can you expect them to be?
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:42 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
...they are just flat out terrified of a HRC candidacy.
Seriously, I would take her over our current president in a heartbeat. But she is going to be savaged in the Democratic primaries. This rush to coronate her as the heir apparent is ill conceived.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:43 am to a want
quote:
I like the republican response to "is she qualified"
It's a lot closer to the independent opinion than the Dem opinion is.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:44 am to a want
quote:
not to mention 8 years as first lady
It's funny that you think this qualifies her to be president.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:44 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
But she is going to be savaged in the Democratic primaries.
by whom?
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:45 am to a want
quote:
by whom?
Any of her primary challengers. Do you think that no one is going to run against her? Seriously?
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:48 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Any of her primary challengers.
Savaged in what way? You place too much stock in your own Republican propaganda. NONE of her Democratic Party primary challengers will use Benghazi as some campaign point because they all know it's just Republican bullshite.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:49 am to a want
quote:
But she is going to be savaged in the Democratic primaries.
by whom?
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:51 am to Rex
quote:
NONE of her Democratic Party primary challengers will use Benghazi as some campaign point
oh sweet Rex....so naive
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:52 am to a want
No need to read, if you like it the story must be written by a communist.
Any person that doesn't want to hold the president and the Mrs Clinton accountable for lying to those 4 families by telling them 3 days latter that this whole thing was about a video, WHEN THE POS's NEW BETTER !!!!
Anybody, that don't think that is a crime against the American people is FOS.
Also we need to get to the bottom of why the Benghazi consulate asked for further protection and didn't get it. Was it because the president & Clinton was trying to buy back arms that they had given to Al Qada.
Any person that doesn't want to hold the president and the Mrs Clinton accountable for lying to those 4 families by telling them 3 days latter that this whole thing was about a video, WHEN THE POS's NEW BETTER !!!!
Anybody, that don't think that is a crime against the American people is FOS.
Also we need to get to the bottom of why the Benghazi consulate asked for further protection and didn't get it. Was it because the president & Clinton was trying to buy back arms that they had given to Al Qada.
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:52 am to Rex
quote:
Savaged in what way? You place too much stock in your own Republican propaganda. NONE of her Democratic Party primary challengers will use Benghazi as some campaign point because they all know it's just Republican bullshite.
lol, no shite right?
Love how they think Dems will be tearing each other apart and running to the extreme left because republicans are dumb enough to do it to themselves.
I guess just wishful thinking on their part
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:53 am to Choctaw
quote:
oh sweet Rex....so naive
then please name one Democrat that will/has?
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:55 am to MJM
quote:
then please name one Democrat that will/has?
whatever Dem shithead decides to run against her.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:55 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
My thoughts exactly.
She isn't going to be able to get away with this in the Democratic primaries/debates...
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:56 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Any of her primary challengers. Do you think that no one is going to run against her? Seriously?
You mean like Joe Biden...who served in the same administration?
The dem primary isn't going to come close to the cluster-cuss that was the 2012 GOP primary. Hillary and Biden are the only ones who will have any money. Nobody is going to donate to Martin O'Malley or whoever the hell decides to run. Plus the Ds aren't divided like the Rs.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:56 am to MJM
The only viable Democratic primary possibilities right now are Hillary, Biden, and Warren.
Biden and Warren are going to savage Hillary on Benghazi? REALLY? They have each already very publicly defended her.
I'd like to know which "primary challengers" Wolfhound45 is talking about.
Biden and Warren are going to savage Hillary on Benghazi? REALLY? They have each already very publicly defended her.
I'd like to know which "primary challengers" Wolfhound45 is talking about.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:58 am to Rex
quote:
You place too much stock in your own Republican propaganda.
Rex, I am a practical man. Anyone who enters the race will use whatever means they have available to them in order to overcome her advantages (and she has a lot). Nothing will be off the table - to include Benghazi. Admire her all you want, but her challengers plan on winning the nomination. Period.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 11:59 am to Rex
quote:
I'd like to know which "primary challengers" Wolfhound45 is talking about.
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:02 pm to Rex
quote:
I'd like to know which "primary challengers" Wolfhound45 is talking about.
So, Biden and Warren are not going to mention it in the least bit? No bit about who do you want to answer the phone at 2:00 am? Really?
Okay, I will trust your judgement. You are the expert on liberal/progressive candidates.
ETA: Have to admit, I am bookmarking this for the day it comes out in the debates/primaries. Someone is going to sling some mud. Some proxy (e.g. news outlet or political organization) is going to bring it up. Agree or disagree with the validity of the decisions that were made, they are on the table from an election standpoint.
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 12:06 pm
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News