- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:01 pm to Machine
well you're miserable so that's understandable.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:01 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
why does this board so vehemently believe that everyone would be healthy if they just always made the "right choices?
I don't. But this isn't about everyone having the same health. It's about everyone having the same opportunity for healthcare
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:03 pm to NOFOX
quote:That is true in any modern system. We die in hospitals, hospice, or assisted living which is tallied aa medical as well. Those costs will always be there. But it is not only a geriatric issue.
End of life care represents 10-20% of total medical spending.
A 25y/o trauma victim may previously have spent little or nothing on healthcare. When he dies after multiple surgeries and an extended ICU stay, virtually 100% of his lifetime care costs will have occurred during that single stay.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
The same way they rate SNFs with differing patient acuity?
Not as familiar with SNF risk adjustments, are they demographic/ICD based?
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:06 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Not as familiar with SNF risk adjustments, are they demographic/ICD based?
Yes. They target typical issues in NHs like falls, pain control, wounds.
You could use HAIs, etc.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:07 pm to roadGator
quote:
Publish facility and provider satisfaction ratings along with quality results.
quote:Hospitals and medical providers mainly.
Who is fighting it?
As long as we are dealing with an aggressively adversarial tort industry, nondiscoverability of internal quality review analysis is critical. Eliminate the one, and you can release the other.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:08 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
A 25y/o trauma victim may previously have spent little or nothing on healthcare. When he dies after multiple surgeries and an extended ICU stay, virtually 100% of his lifetime care costs will have occurred during that single stay.
This is the outlier. Gramma on her 4th trip to the ER with COPD and dyspnea isnt.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yes. They target typical issues in NHs like falls, pain control, wounds.
You could use HAIs, etc.
In an acute setting you'd want to focus more on comorbidities like an Elixhauser score.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:13 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That is true in any modern system. We die in hospitals, hospice, or assisted living which is tallied aa medical as well. Those costs will always be there. But it is not only a geriatric issue.
A 25y/o trauma victim may previously have spent little or nothing on healthcare. When he dies after multiple surgeries and an extended ICU stay, virtually 100% of his lifetime care costs will have occurred during that single stay.
And what percentage of end of life costs do you think are attributed to patients with a single discrete high cost event?
And how do you explain findings like:
quote:
Over half a million Americans die each year from cancer. While progress has been made over the last two decades in addressing patient preferences near the end of life, much more needs to be done. Most patients with cancer who are approaching the end of their lives prefer supportive care that minimizes symptoms and their days in the hospital. Unfortunately, the care patients receive does not always reflect their own preferences, but the prevailing styles of treatment in the regions and health care systems where they happen to receive cancer treatment.
In analyses of Medicare data that control for patient age, sex, race, tumor type, and non-cancer chronic conditions, the chances that a patient with advanced cancer died in the hospital in 2010 varied from one in eight (13%) to one in two (50%) depending on the medical center providing their care, even among National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. Similarly, the number of days patients spent in intensive care units (ICUs) in the last month of life varied more than fivefold across these centers. The chances of a patient receiving hospice care differed by a factor of five.
Or studies that find that the regional supply of health care resources is a driver of the intensity of care, irrespective of the patient’s particular condition or illness.
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:16 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
The federal government spent $980 billion in tax revenue on direct healthcare distribution systems in 2015
Give it to the states via the 10th...
1T saved
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:20 pm to NOFOX
quote:
And how do you explain findings like:
How do you explain them?
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:47 pm to NOFOX
quote:
quote: Over half a million Americans die each year from cancer. While progress has been made over the last two decades in addressing patient preferences near the end of life, much more needs to be done. Most patients with cancer who are approaching the end of their lives prefer supportive care that minimizes symptoms and their days in the hospital. Unfortunately, the care patients receive does not always reflect their own preferences, but the prevailing styles of treatment in the regions and health care systems where they happen to receive cancer treatment. In analyses of Medicare data that control for patient age, sex, race, tumor type, and non-cancer chronic conditions, the chances that a patient with advanced cancer died in the hospital in 2010 varied from one in eight (13%) to one in two (50%) depending on the medical center providing their care, even among National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. Similarly, the number of days patients spent in intensive care units (ICUs) in the last month of life varied more than fivefold across these centers. The chances of a patient receiving hospice care differed by a factor of five.
Fascinating and unsurprising.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:14 pm to Machine
quote:ok
that's silly
Most fears are irrational. I know you are fearless. Please resoect the rest of us
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:19 pm to Antonio Moss
I'm starting to get to the point where I want business and money out of the way of healthcare....
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:21 pm to the808bass
quote:Peas in a pod.
This is the outlier. Gramma on her 4th trip to the ER with COPD and dyspnea isnt.
The point being, any system is going to skew costs to end of life care.
The problem is that in our system, all care is very expensive. There is limited market pressure to drive costs down. There is extensive societal and legal pressure driving costs up. We disempower decision-makers and expertise in favor of regulation and bureaucracy.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The problem is that in our system, all care is very expensive. There is limited market pressure to drive costs down. There is extensive societal and legal pressure driving costs up. We disempower decision-makers and expertise in favor of regulation and bureaucracy.
Bingeaux.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:35 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
There is limited market pressure to drive costs down. There is extensive societal and legal pressure driving costs up. We disempower decision-makers and expertise in favor of regulation and bureaucracy.
I largely agree. Financial responsibility at the point of service increases the pressure to drive down utilization and therefore costs.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:38 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Is there a better answer out there?
Something I've tossed about for a while now but would really like constructive feedback on: barring insurance companies from dealing with medical personnel/facilities.
Around 25% of medical costs come from the brigade of employees a doctor needs to keep around just to handle dealing with the various insurance companies and each one's particular way of doing things.
Removing this avenue does two things:
-it lowers costs by allowing the medical professional/establishment to cut staff
-eventually market forces would push insurance companies to streamline their services
Posted on 3/28/17 at 4:34 pm to the808bass
quote:
We waste millions on single patients who are terminal. I believe over 50% of Medicare expenditures occur in the last year of an EEs life.
most of that 50% is the last 10 days.
no one wants to be the one to say, let this person die.
our culture is childish about death.
I saw a study a few years ago in which the , MDs and RNs were trained to talk about and accept the death of patients. Even when the family signed papers, half the time a nurse or MD would keep them alive anyway.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News