Started By
Message

re: Out of the Box Healthcare Ideas

Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

I fear death terribly
that's silly
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:01 pm to
well you're miserable so that's understandable.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30575 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

why does this board so vehemently believe that everyone would be healthy if they just always made the "right choices?

I don't. But this isn't about everyone having the same health. It's about everyone having the same opportunity for healthcare
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123920 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

End of life care represents 10-20% of total medical spending.
That is true in any modern system. We die in hospitals, hospice, or assisted living which is tallied aa medical as well. Those costs will always be there. But it is not only a geriatric issue.

A 25y/o trauma victim may previously have spent little or nothing on healthcare. When he dies after multiple surgeries and an extended ICU stay, virtually 100% of his lifetime care costs will have occurred during that single stay.

Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21895 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

The same way they rate SNFs with differing patient acuity?


Not as familiar with SNF risk adjustments, are they demographic/ICD based?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Not as familiar with SNF risk adjustments, are they demographic/ICD based?


Yes. They target typical issues in NHs like falls, pain control, wounds.

You could use HAIs, etc.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123920 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Publish facility and provider satisfaction ratings along with quality results.
quote:

Who is fighting it?
Hospitals and medical providers mainly.
As long as we are dealing with an aggressively adversarial tort industry, nondiscoverability of internal quality review analysis is critical. Eliminate the one, and you can release the other.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

A 25y/o trauma victim may previously have spent little or nothing on healthcare. When he dies after multiple surgeries and an extended ICU stay, virtually 100% of his lifetime care costs will have occurred during that single stay.


This is the outlier. Gramma on her 4th trip to the ER with COPD and dyspnea isnt.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21895 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Yes. They target typical issues in NHs like falls, pain control, wounds.

You could use HAIs, etc.


In an acute setting you'd want to focus more on comorbidities like an Elixhauser score.
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9945 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

That is true in any modern system. We die in hospitals, hospice, or assisted living which is tallied aa medical as well. Those costs will always be there. But it is not only a geriatric issue.

A 25y/o trauma victim may previously have spent little or nothing on healthcare. When he dies after multiple surgeries and an extended ICU stay, virtually 100% of his lifetime care costs will have occurred during that single stay.



And what percentage of end of life costs do you think are attributed to patients with a single discrete high cost event?

And how do you explain findings like:

quote:

Over half a million Americans die each year from cancer. While progress has been made over the last two decades in addressing patient preferences near the end of life, much more needs to be done. Most patients with cancer who are approaching the end of their lives prefer supportive care that minimizes symptoms and their days in the hospital. Unfortunately, the care patients receive does not always reflect their own preferences, but the prevailing styles of treatment in the regions and health care systems where they happen to receive cancer treatment.

In analyses of Medicare data that control for patient age, sex, race, tumor type, and non-cancer chronic conditions, the chances that a patient with advanced cancer died in the hospital in 2010 varied from one in eight (13%) to one in two (50%) depending on the medical center providing their care, even among National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. Similarly, the number of days patients spent in intensive care units (ICUs) in the last month of life varied more than fivefold across these centers. The chances of a patient receiving hospice care differed by a factor of five.


Or studies that find that the regional supply of health care resources is a driver of the intensity of care, irrespective of the patient’s particular condition or illness.
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 2:16 pm
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:


The federal government spent $980 billion in tax revenue on direct healthcare distribution systems in 2015


Give it to the states via the 10th...

1T saved
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123920 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

And how do you explain findings like:

How do you explain them?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

quote: Over half a million Americans die each year from cancer. While progress has been made over the last two decades in addressing patient preferences near the end of life, much more needs to be done. Most patients with cancer who are approaching the end of their lives prefer supportive care that minimizes symptoms and their days in the hospital. Unfortunately, the care patients receive does not always reflect their own preferences, but the prevailing styles of treatment in the regions and health care systems where they happen to receive cancer treatment. In analyses of Medicare data that control for patient age, sex, race, tumor type, and non-cancer chronic conditions, the chances that a patient with advanced cancer died in the hospital in 2010 varied from one in eight (13%) to one in two (50%) depending on the medical center providing their care, even among National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Centers. Similarly, the number of days patients spent in intensive care units (ICUs) in the last month of life varied more than fivefold across these centers. The chances of a patient receiving hospice care differed by a factor of five.

Fascinating and unsurprising.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56296 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

that's silly
ok

Most fears are irrational. I know you are fearless. Please resoect the rest of us
Posted by GeauxHouston
Houston,TX
Member since Nov 2013
4402 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:19 pm to
I'm starting to get to the point where I want business and money out of the way of healthcare....
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123920 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

This is the outlier. Gramma on her 4th trip to the ER with COPD and dyspnea isnt.
Peas in a pod.
The point being, any system is going to skew costs to end of life care.

The problem is that in our system, all care is very expensive. There is limited market pressure to drive costs down. There is extensive societal and legal pressure driving costs up. We disempower decision-makers and expertise in favor of regulation and bureaucracy.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

The problem is that in our system, all care is very expensive. There is limited market pressure to drive costs down. There is extensive societal and legal pressure driving costs up. We disempower decision-makers and expertise in favor of regulation and bureaucracy.

Bingeaux.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

There is limited market pressure to drive costs down. There is extensive societal and legal pressure driving costs up. We disempower decision-makers and expertise in favor of regulation and bureaucracy.


I largely agree. Financial responsibility at the point of service increases the pressure to drive down utilization and therefore costs.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51617 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Is there a better answer out there?


Something I've tossed about for a while now but would really like constructive feedback on: barring insurance companies from dealing with medical personnel/facilities.

Around 25% of medical costs come from the brigade of employees a doctor needs to keep around just to handle dealing with the various insurance companies and each one's particular way of doing things.

Removing this avenue does two things:

-it lowers costs by allowing the medical professional/establishment to cut staff

-eventually market forces would push insurance companies to streamline their services
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

We waste millions on single patients who are terminal. I believe over 50% of Medicare expenditures occur in the last year of an EEs life.


most of that 50% is the last 10 days.

no one wants to be the one to say, let this person die.

our culture is childish about death.

I saw a study a few years ago in which the , MDs and RNs were trained to talk about and accept the death of patients. Even when the family signed papers, half the time a nurse or MD would keep them alive anyway.


first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram