re: O'Reilly on Fox is horrible

quote:

---

I'm glad i dont have to watch fox news any more.

---

How were you forced to watch it previously and what changed to lift this burden from you?

quote:

---

O'Reilly on Fox is horrible

---

Look, we have to secure our border first, arright? We all know what's going on here, arright? The folks are out there, they're workin' hard, arright? And these pinheads in Washington are too busy goin' on Jimmy Kimmel to deal with what the folks need, arright? I just want to point out that this show is responsible for the latest round of border talks, because we brought it up here first, arright?

I wanna go to our next segment called "High Times in Colorado," because I just got a report that said Colorado has seen a 900% increase in domestic terrorism since it legalized pot, arright? 900%. That's 1 out of 3 people, arright? Let's go to our resident, uh, expert here from the Marijuana Policy Institute, David Forrester. Arright, so David, you're obviously a big pot head, right? You love smokin' "the doobies," don'tcha?

MR. FORRESTER: Well, Bill, I think one of the things we have to keep in mind here is that --

ARRIGHT, LOOK, ARRIGHT? 900% OF CHILDREN IN COLORADO HAVE CANCER BECAUSE OF ALL THE MARIJUANAS IN THE AIR. WHAT ARE YOU PROPOSING TO DO ABOUT THAT?

MR. FORRESTER: I, I really have to question your numbers, Bill, I think that --

LOOK, I DON'T HAVE TIME TO LISTEN TO THIS PINHEAD, ARRIGHT? CUT HIS MIC. ARRIGHT? Arright. Now let's go to our next segment where I talk down to the female panelists, arright?

quote:

---

He's an egotistical blowhard

---

Definitely.

quote:

---

who is devoid of principles

---

Somewhat true, but overstated.

quote:

---

besides those he can use to try and win a debate.

---

Most pundits are this way, but at least he's unsophisticated enough to be transparent about it.

quote:

---

uote:
besides those he can use to try and win a debate.
Most pundits are this way, but at least he's unsophisticated enough to be transparent about it.

---

I think he surrounds himself w/ so many "yes men" on his personal staff that he's basically become the emperor without any cloths.

quote:

---

Because I don't subscribe to cable anymore. Simple as that. I know you wanted a more complex answer, but it's as simple as that.

Yes, FOX was the most in line with my beliefs and it hurt to watch it

---

I wasn't really wanting a more complex answer. I was just trying to figure out what you meant. I couldn't understand why you were no longer in a position to have to watch Fox. Now I get it.

The problem is that the starting point and the unstated presumptions made by most of the media, mostly including what they decide to actually report about and what gets omitted, is so premeated with left leaning philosphy that Fox, as unacceptably crappy as it is, is practically necessary viewing for some sort of attempt at balance.

hannity and o reilly have really bit hard on the pro zionist agenda lately as well.

hannity had a palestinian guy on and would ask him questions and when the guy would try to answer hannity kept interjecting and interrupting him. it was beyond insane. every time he'd do it too. like clockwork.

screw both of them.

Carville is a propagandist.


The no spin zone by definition means NO TALKING POINTS OR SPIN.

I like the fact that he interupts B.S. talking points.

Since he has the top rated cable news show I guess that strategy has been good for him.

Why would we want to hear talking points, sailent or not?

So you thik O'Riley doesn't have talking points too?

You're as far off as the left numbskulls that watch Maher and Matthews.

THEY ALL frickING LIE.

Agree about Bill, but Kudlow was the only good thing on CNBC.