- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Opponents to ask for rehearing in St. George matter
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:23 pm to tommy2tone1999
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:23 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
We do know that SG did not receive service of the BRPD and BRFD, not should SG be responsible for the pension funds for those departments
No doubt about that. Those are the easy ones.
1
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:23 pm to tharre4
quote:
The regime simply cannot allow St. George to happen. They know how royally F*CKed they will be and they did it to themselves.
Yep
They screwed themselves but will never admit it, they'll double down on the stupidity
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:26 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
. As far as I am concerned, they can float a bond and let the remaining taxpayers - the ones who benefitted from money that was not theirs - pay the bond back.
If you can accomplish that, great.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:30 pm to doubleb
quote:
No doubt about that. Those are the easy ones.
and the largest
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Once LASC denies this rehearing, I expect the NAACP one to be filed in federal court immediately thereafter.
I’d expect abstention to be applied here. Very clearly a state law issue.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:41 pm to Dixie Normus
They would only be able to appeal it to a federal court if there were some constitutional issue involved.
I don’t see how there is a 14th Amendment case or other such constitutional issue involved, at least not until St George forms an ISD and the NAACP calls it white flight.
I don’t see how there is a 14th Amendment case or other such constitutional issue involved, at least not until St George forms an ISD and the NAACP calls it white flight.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:43 pm to tharre4
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:44 pm to tommy2tone1999
quote:
SG organizers have accounted though
They literally have the receipts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:56 pm to Bard
quote:
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter? Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
White privilege
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:58 pm to bulldog95
Not in the Constitution unless they found a penumbra or enumeration to that effect.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
The NAACP's concerns appear to deal with the school system which is not yet established. If it becomes against the City of St. George, then at least at this point the new city will have access to public funds for it's defense.
The local NAACP also sought to deconsolidate the City-Parish government, so I imagine their credibility in a case of this kind can easily be shot down
The local NAACP also sought to deconsolidate the City-Parish government, so I imagine their credibility in a case of this kind can easily be shot down
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 3:00 pm
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News