Started By
Message

re: Obviously the DOJ has to bring charges against Rice, right?

Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:15 pm to
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5854 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:15 pm to
No
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

For doing her job?


You're such a failure.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35474 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

IIRC, Flynn name was leaked to the NYTs.
Anyone with access to the report could have leaked it, including a ton of people in Trump's administration.
Posted by guy4lsu
shreveport
Member since Aug 2004
2868 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:18 pm to
The she was doing her job excuse doesn't fly. Her job was to make sure that the info stayed private so I would say she failed in that regard.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:20 pm to
For what? What she's accused of violates no law and is readily explainable as an act taken in the course of her duties.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

For doing her job?

Pretty sure unmasking and disseminating a conversation between Trump and the Australian PM and Mexican President isn't part of "her job".

And I'm also pretty sure that when she does unmask Americans in incidental intercepts, that safeguarding that classified intelligence IS part of "her job".

Are you suggesting that she isn't accountable for classified intelligence she unmasked somehow finding its way to the media?

In what world is she not responsible for safeguarding classified materials that she secured?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79957 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

I prefer mustard on my nothingburger


quote:

Spaulding Smails


You'll get nothing and like it.
Posted by guy4lsu
shreveport
Member since Aug 2004
2868 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Anyone with access to the report could have leaked it, including a ton of people in Trump's administration.


Just how many people do you think had access to the report?
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Her job was to make sure that the info stayed private so I would say she failed in that regard.


Unless you can prove she leaked I don't see how its a "failure" she's liable for
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure unmasking and disseminating a conversation between Trump and the Australian PM and Mexican President isn't part of "her job".



Wait. Explain how she did this. You know those conversations took place after the inauguration right?
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:25 pm
Posted by guy4lsu
shreveport
Member since Aug 2004
2868 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Unless you can prove she leaked I don't see how its a "failure" she's liable for


She unmasked the names. It was her responsibility to safeguard those names otherwise she shouldn't have unmasked them.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

For what? What she's accused of violates no law and is readily explainable as an act taken in the course of her duties.

Since when does a conversation between the President and the Australian PM or Mexican President meet the definition of "intelligence worthy of national security"?
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5854 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:26 pm to
Flynn is a arse. He has pissed off many people on the right and left. Fired by both parties and to lay the blame on one party doesn't fly.

When was this leaked? That doesn't even matter because the IC has both republicans and democrats employed.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:28 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261685 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

The Russians!!! shite needs to end.


Yep, a litmus test for stupidity.
Posted by Vastmind
B Ara
Member since Sep 2013
4992 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

What's the evidence she leaked anything to the media?


Circumstantially, her husband is an executive producer for ABC news.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

For what? What she's accused of violates no law and is readily explainable as an act taken in the course of her duties.




bull fricking shite

you morally bankrupt mother frickers
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Since when does a conversation between the President and the Australian PM or Mexican President meet the definition of "intelligence worthy of national security"?


Hold up, are you actually postulating that Susan Rice leaked phone conversations between Trump and those people after his inauguration and after she held any position anywhere in DC?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram