- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Obamacare Is Uninsuring the Insured
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:41 pm
quote:
Obamacare Is Uninsuring the Insured
by Doug Badger
August 10, 2017
The law expanded coverage among the poor at the expense of coverage among the middle class.
The number of people with individual health-insurance coverage is shrinking. Despite $146 billion in federal subsidies to low-income households and well-capitalized insurers, 2.6 million fewer people had individual policies in March 2017 than in March 2016, a drop of nearly 15 percent.
....
And all this “needless turmoil” antedated the Trump administration. He took office during the closing days of the 2017 open-enrollment period. By then, the die was cast. The narrative nevertheless endures. Believing it requires indifference to millions of people who can no longer afford individual policies and to millions more who may forfeit their policies with the next round of rate hikes. For many of them, Obamacare has been a serial nightmare, producing policy cancellations, skyrocketing premiums and deductibles, and a narrowing choice of doctors before finally leaving them uninsured.
Obamacare is insuring more poor people and uninsuring millions of middle-income people. That suits the Democratic party and many congressional Republicans just fine. They measure social progress in the number of people receiving government assistance. Those struggling to pay their own way evoke little sympathy. Lawmakers of both parties, whose consciences were lacerated by CBO’s theory that millions would “lose” coverage under the GOP’s “repeal and replace” legislation (most of those “losses” the result of people voluntarily dropping insurance once the individual mandate was repealed) are unmoved that millions actually have lost coverage under the law they fought to preserve.
Legislators do, however, grieve over insurance-company losses. The NEJM editorial urged Congress to “bolster insurers’ confidence” through a “permanent reinsurance program” — a new entitlement to corporate welfare.
It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. . . .
LINK
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:45 pm to NC_Tigah
It's ok because the people that are losing coverage are the super rich middle class. They can afford it. What's really important is that people that really needed healthcare (the underprivileged, low incomes, and non whites) are now getting it instead of dying in the streets like they were 7 years ago.
Signed,
The Left
Signed,
The Left
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:48 pm to NC_Tigah
Obamacare has always been a redistribution of wealth scheme. That is exactly what the Dem leftists intended it to be.
This post was edited on 8/26/17 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 8/26/17 at 5:39 pm to AU86
quote:No, Mr. Bond, they expected it to die (Channeling my best German Goldfinger accent)
That is exactly what the Dem leftists intended it to be.
This post was edited on 8/26/17 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 8/26/17 at 5:49 pm to NC_Tigah
Obamacare is an abortion.
(If you are conflicted after reading the above statement, abortion is a descriptor of negativity)
(If you are conflicted after reading the above statement, abortion is a descriptor of negativity)
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:12 pm to Ham And Glass
quote:
Obamacare is an abortion.
And we all know how much liberals love abortions.
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:25 pm to NC_Tigah
And has been doing that since 2014.
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:44 pm to NC_Tigah
So true...
quote:
It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. . . .
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:47 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
:bamaatl:
a completely disingenuous loon
Posted on 8/26/17 at 8:30 pm to AU86
quote:
Obamacare has always been a redistribution of wealth scheme. That is exactly what the Dem leftists intended it to be.
Especially after he promised only the rich would pay for healthcare and yet like socialist left wing clockwork, the middle class ends up footing the bill while also seeing an increase in their rates.
Posted on 8/26/17 at 9:33 pm to NC_Tigah
Anyone who voted for the piece of shite Obama or the Liberal Trash in Congress who pushed this abortion of a law thru should be in fricking prison.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:28 am to AU86
Where the bill fails as redistribution of wealth is that it's not a straight cash payout, and by and large the targeted demographics don't want the subsidized product because they still have to pay something to get it.
As I've posted before, it's no more attractive at $40/month than it was at $200/month.
So instead of redistribution of wealth, the lower incomes pay a penalty tax for not taking the dole.
As I've posted before, it's no more attractive at $40/month than it was at $200/month.
So instead of redistribution of wealth, the lower incomes pay a penalty tax for not taking the dole.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:42 am to NC_Tigah
Quit whining and vote in people who say they will repeal it.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 8:01 am to NC_Tigah
It's perhaps the greatest symbol of establishment dysfunction. An almost universally unpopular law is cratering before our very eyes. It was passed by democrats, who lost power because of its failure. Now republicans control everything and they are too scared to repeal it.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 4:25 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Despite $146 billion in federal subsidies to low-income households and well-capitalized insurers, 2.6 million fewer people had individual policies in March 2017 than in March 2016, a drop of nearly 15 percent.
And yet more people are insured.
It's almost as if they're being disingenuous by only using individual policies, and not discussing things like group policies for Medicaid expansion or those transitioning to Medicare.
I can't imagine why a publication like the National Review would want to be disingenuous on this subject...
Posted on 8/27/17 at 4:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
They measure social progress in the number of people receiving government assistance. Those struggling to pay their own way evoke little sympathy.
Cannot be repeated enough.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News