Started By
Message
locked post

Obamacare Is Uninsuring the Insured

Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:41 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123891 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:41 pm
quote:

Obamacare Is Uninsuring the Insured
by Doug Badger
August 10, 2017


The law expanded coverage among the poor at the expense of coverage among the middle class.

The number of people with individual health-insurance coverage is shrinking. Despite $146 billion in federal subsidies to low-income households and well-capitalized insurers, 2.6 million fewer people had individual policies in March 2017 than in March 2016, a drop of nearly 15 percent.
....

And all this “needless turmoil” antedated the Trump administration. He took office during the closing days of the 2017 open-enrollment period. By then, the die was cast. The narrative nevertheless endures. Believing it requires indifference to millions of people who can no longer afford individual policies and to millions more who may forfeit their policies with the next round of rate hikes. For many of them, Obamacare has been a serial nightmare, producing policy cancellations, skyrocketing premiums and deductibles, and a narrowing choice of doctors before finally leaving them uninsured.

Obamacare is insuring more poor people and uninsuring millions of middle-income people. That suits the Democratic party and many congressional Republicans just fine. They measure social progress in the number of people receiving government assistance. Those struggling to pay their own way evoke little sympathy. Lawmakers of both parties, whose consciences were lacerated by CBO’s theory that millions would “lose” coverage under the GOP’s “repeal and replace” legislation (most of those “losses” the result of people voluntarily dropping insurance once the individual mandate was repealed) are unmoved that millions actually have lost coverage under the law they fought to preserve.

Legislators do, however, grieve over insurance-company losses. The NEJM editorial urged Congress to “bolster insurers’ confidence” through a “permanent reinsurance program” — a new entitlement to corporate welfare.

It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. . . .

LINK
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:42 pm to
:bamaatl:
Posted by Shenanigans
Spring Hill, TN
Member since Nov 2012
2394 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:42 pm to
First upvote
Posted by Gr8t8s
Member since Oct 2009
2579 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:45 pm to
It's ok because the people that are losing coverage are the super rich middle class. They can afford it. What's really important is that people that really needed healthcare (the underprivileged, low incomes, and non whites) are now getting it instead of dying in the streets like they were 7 years ago.

Signed,
The Left
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22372 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 4:48 pm to
Obamacare has always been a redistribution of wealth scheme. That is exactly what the Dem leftists intended it to be.
This post was edited on 8/26/17 at 4:50 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123891 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

That is exactly what the Dem leftists intended it to be.
No, Mr. Bond, they expected it to die (Channeling my best German Goldfinger accent)

This post was edited on 8/26/17 at 5:44 pm
Posted by Ham And Glass
Member since Nov 2016
1516 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 5:49 pm to
Obamacare is an abortion.

(If you are conflicted after reading the above statement, abortion is a descriptor of negativity)
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Obamacare is an abortion.



And we all know how much liberals love abortions.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98730 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:25 pm to
And has been doing that since 2014.
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:44 pm to
So true...

quote:

It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. It is a familiar story: Corporations get bailouts, the poor get benefits, and those in between get the bill. . . .
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67875 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

:bamaatl:


a completely disingenuous loon
Posted by BradPitt
Where the wild things are
Member since Nov 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Obamacare has always been a redistribution of wealth scheme. That is exactly what the Dem leftists intended it to be.


Especially after he promised only the rich would pay for healthcare and yet like socialist left wing clockwork, the middle class ends up footing the bill while also seeing an increase in their rates.
Posted by AlceeFortier
Member since Dec 2016
1795 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 8:53 pm to
no
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22372 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 8:55 pm to
Yes.
Posted by Armchair_QB
Member since Aug 2013
1512 posts
Posted on 8/26/17 at 9:33 pm to
Anyone who voted for the piece of shite Obama or the Liberal Trash in Congress who pushed this abortion of a law thru should be in fricking prison.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19514 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:28 am to
Where the bill fails as redistribution of wealth is that it's not a straight cash payout, and by and large the targeted demographics don't want the subsidized product because they still have to pay something to get it.

As I've posted before, it's no more attractive at $40/month than it was at $200/month.

So instead of redistribution of wealth, the lower incomes pay a penalty tax for not taking the dole.
Posted by Minnesota Tiger
Member since Oct 2005
4414 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 7:42 am to
Quit whining and vote in people who say they will repeal it.

Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39451 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 8:01 am to
It's perhaps the greatest symbol of establishment dysfunction. An almost universally unpopular law is cratering before our very eyes. It was passed by democrats, who lost power because of its failure. Now republicans control everything and they are too scared to repeal it.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Despite $146 billion in federal subsidies to low-income households and well-capitalized insurers, 2.6 million fewer people had individual policies in March 2017 than in March 2016, a drop of nearly 15 percent.


And yet more people are insured.

It's almost as if they're being disingenuous by only using individual policies, and not discussing things like group policies for Medicaid expansion or those transitioning to Medicare.

I can't imagine why a publication like the National Review would want to be disingenuous on this subject...

Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34653 posts
Posted on 8/27/17 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

They measure social progress in the number of people receiving government assistance. Those struggling to pay their own way evoke little sympathy.


Cannot be repeated enough.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram