Started By
Message

re: Obama approves killing of civilians in fight vs. ISIL

Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:57 am to
Posted by mostbesttigerfanever
TD platinum member suite in TS
Member since Jan 2010
5016 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:57 am to
quote:



Like I said, do a Bin Laden to kill specific targets but don't destroy entire city blocks. That's negligent homicide.



Do a bin laden??? frick you. So we should just sent special ops after soecial ops after soecial ops. Yeah that won't take forever.
Posted by David Lo Pan
Member since Aug 2014
113 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Something tells me you didn't feel this way when Bush was president. I'm sure you were one of the libs calling him a war criminal and mass murderer.


Who gives a shite what someone felt 10 years ago. frick ISIS.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 8:04 am
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72051 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:07 am to


Fear the bogeyman.

FEAR HIM!!
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:11 am to
When complaining about drones please remember the alternative is sending in ground troops. There is no "right" answer; just a least bad one.
Posted by David Lo Pan
Member since Aug 2014
113 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:11 am to
frick man, I'm just so tired of seeing "YEAH WELL I BET YOU WEREN'T LIKE THIS WHEN BLAH BLAH BLAH"

shite's old. Let's focus on killing these idiots beheading, raping, and committing genocide.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90547 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:18 am to
I agree with you. But I have to ask did you support Bush when he "took the gloves off" or did you cry to have him tried for war crimes
Posted by David Lo Pan
Member since Aug 2014
113 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:21 am to
Sigh
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29416 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Who gives a shite what someone felt 10 years ago. frick ISIS.
I'm just looking for a little consistency here and less hypocrisy.

You can't call one president a war criminal for doing it and then cheer on your guy for doing the same thing.

Fair enough?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72051 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:27 am to
quote:

frick man, I'm just so tired of seeing "YEAH WELL I BET YOU WEREN'T LIKE THIS WHEN BLAH BLAH BLAH"
My opinion of it aside, it is a noteworthy question.

What changed? Why do you support the collateral damage now, but opposed it years ago?

I find the answers to those question fascinating.
Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3133 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:28 am to
quote:

wonder how you, or any other pro-war moron on here, would feel if the Arabs were dropping bombs on American towns and cities to take out your president? As long as the innocent people being killed are over there...it's A-OK.


I'm pretty fricking sure if they had the means to do it they wouldn't worry about collateral damage 1/1000000 as much as we worry about it.
Posted by David Lo Pan
Member since Aug 2014
113 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:29 am to
Ask away man.

I guess that whole vicious cycle will never stop turning
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72051 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Ask away man. I guess that whole vicious cycle will never stop turning
Nope. Never.
Posted by David Lo Pan
Member since Aug 2014
113 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:31 am to
quote:

My opinion of it aside, it is a noteworthy question.

What changed? Why do you support the collateral damage now, but opposed it years ago?

I find the answers to those question fascinating


I know what you mean, but you're just going to get the same old same old. Then it turns into a game of gotcha's. It never ends.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:31 am to
The cost in civilian casualties is well worth the dividends in psychological effect. Don't harbor terrorists and you won't get bombed.

I'm still waiting to hear back from the pentagon on my idea of having nothing but female pilots doing the bombing runs from now on. The psychological effect would be devastating.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72051 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:34 am to
quote:

The cost in civilian casualties is well worth the dividends in psychological effect. Don't harbor terrorists and you won't get bombed.
IMO, it works to the opposite effect.

Family that is minding their own business is killed due to collateral damage. Surviving members join the terrorist organization out of rage.

I would wager that that happens FAR more often than people think.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 8:35 am
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30177 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:39 am to
quote:

I wonder how you, or any other pro-war moron on here, would feel if the Arabs were dropping bombs on American towns and cities to take out your president?


Comparison of ISIS to America....seems legit.

Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
19017 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:54 am to
When does Israel start blasting Barry for killing innocents?
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29263 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Collateral damage is a part of any war.

Sucks, but thems the breaks.


oh, congress declared war? I must have missed that
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29263 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 10:19 am to
we can't let isis kill all of the civilians!

we gonna do it!
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13560 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 10:20 am to
When the targets cowardly hide amongst the masses, innocents will die. If these people would stand up and fight for themselves, none of this would ever happen.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram