- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
North Korea Rejects Diplomacy Until They Can Strike the East Coast of US
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:15 pm
LINK
This has always been the goal. NK has been playing the long game for decades, and they finally are close enough to admit it.
They want to test a nuclear bomb above ground, and launch an ICBM that is capable of hitting DC, then they will sit down.
I don't see how we and our allies can let that happen.
I assume Russia knows that one or both of those tests are imminent hence their public removal of support from DPRK.
This is the closest we've been to a full fledged invasion/conflict since the Cold War.
quote:
A North Korean official reaffirmed Pyongyang's commitment to developing a long-range intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching "all the way to the East coast of the mainland US," on Monday, telling CNN that the rogue nation is currently not interested in diplomacy with the US until it achieves that goal.
This has always been the goal. NK has been playing the long game for decades, and they finally are close enough to admit it.
They want to test a nuclear bomb above ground, and launch an ICBM that is capable of hitting DC, then they will sit down.
I don't see how we and our allies can let that happen.
I assume Russia knows that one or both of those tests are imminent hence their public removal of support from DPRK.
This is the closest we've been to a full fledged invasion/conflict since the Cold War.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:16 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
capable of hitting DC
Eh... I know it sounds bad... but frick, there are days when you just have to wonder... how bad would that be...?
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:18 pm to TennesseeFan25
I mean as long as Trump is out of town when it happens it wouldn't be the worst thing
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:18 pm to KosmoCramer
When will people wake up?
They will hold us off with talks until they can inflict harm upon us.
Then they will tell us to frick off.
We need to nip this in the bud.
They will hold us off with talks until they can inflict harm upon us.
Then they will tell us to frick off.
We need to nip this in the bud.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:19 pm to 225bred
upvote just for your avatar pic
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:33 pm to 225bred
quote:
They will hold us off with talks until they can inflict harm upon us.
Then they will tell us to frick off.
You got to give it to them...it's not a terribe plan. Lol
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:35 pm to TSLG
quote:
You got to give it to them...it's not a terribe plan. Lol
Amen. They realize how stupid and weak our politicians are.
They've taken advantage of DC for decades.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:39 pm to TennesseeFan25
quote:
how bad would that be...?
Id rather not have my friends and family in the area nuked
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:01 pm to 225bred
quote:
They will hold us off with talks until they can inflict harm upon us.
Then they will tell us to frick off.
That's exactly what is going on. Once they demonstrate the capability, they will make their demands for aid and support while holding a gun against our heads, knowing well that our success rate in anti missile defense tests is 60% at best.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:01 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
That's exactly what is going on. Once they demonstrate the capability, they will make their demands for aid and support while holding a gun against our heads, knowing well that our success rate in anti missile defense tests is 60% at best.
Exactly. It's so obvious.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:03 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
I assume Russia knows that one or both of those tests are imminent hence their public removal of support from DPRK.
I have the impression that Russia supports North Korea in this effort.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:05 pm to TBoy
When the bombs start flying I doubt Russia will support them.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:07 pm to TBoy
we must convince NK that we are willing to preemptively nuke them.
its all we got.
its all we got.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:11 pm to Stingray
quote:
we must convince NK that we are willing to preemptively nuke them.
its all we got.
That's pretty much been Trump's strategy
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:15 pm to Stingray
Trump have already threatened the turn Pyongyang into glass, and they're still rejecting diplomacy.
I think we'll look back as today being the straw that broke the camel's back. The DPRK is going to test a nuke or an ICBM and we will do something militarily.
Especially since we have our joint exercises going on there now. We are ready to go.
I think we'll look back as today being the straw that broke the camel's back. The DPRK is going to test a nuke or an ICBM and we will do something militarily.
Especially since we have our joint exercises going on there now. We are ready to go.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 6:28 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
When the bombs start flying I doubt Russia will support them.
I dunno. Let's say NK gets a capable missile and launches 10 our way. Say 60% success rate of shooting them down, so at best 4 hit the US. Say they targeted the upper atmosphere for bring down the grid and targeted DC while the president and cabinet, congress, and most of the upper brass were in town. Say 2 hit DC and 2 explode in atmosphere bringing down 70-80% of the grid.
You'd have mass chaos and no forms of communication, along with most of the leadership killed.
I'm not convinced Russia or China would help us. They'd be more apt to launch an invasion while we were crippled in order to become the top powerhouse nation. I'm not sure how Europe would react honestly...id hope they'd come to our aid.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 6:35 pm to deltaland
The whole 60% success rate is being over blown here. Thats in controlled tests where they try to take 1 down with a single shot.
In real life applications they take multiple shots
In real life applications they take multiple shots
Posted on 10/16/17 at 6:42 pm to LSUnation78
They also take a while to get prepped. We wouldn't allow that.
The main issue is the artillery pointed at Seoul.
That will kill a lot of people including American soldiers, their families, and US citizens in SK.
It would be a disaster unless we can create a coup within NK with a pre-emtive nuclear attack.
There isn't a great option, but letting NK obtain ICBMs and hydrogen bombs isn't either.
I think we are close to going fo a military strategy, maybe a targeted strike on Pyongyang, and see what they do.
It's either than, or just no holds barred pure oblivion.
The main issue is the artillery pointed at Seoul.
That will kill a lot of people including American soldiers, their families, and US citizens in SK.
It would be a disaster unless we can create a coup within NK with a pre-emtive nuclear attack.
There isn't a great option, but letting NK obtain ICBMs and hydrogen bombs isn't either.
I think we are close to going fo a military strategy, maybe a targeted strike on Pyongyang, and see what they do.
It's either than, or just no holds barred pure oblivion.
Posted on 10/16/17 at 6:58 pm to deltaland
quote:
Let's say NK gets a capable missile and launches 10 our way. Say 60% success rate of shooting them down, so at best 4 hit the US. Say they targeted the upper atmosphere for bring down the grid and targeted DC while the president and cabinet, congress, and most of the upper brass were in town. Say 2 hit DC and 2 explode in atmosphere bringing down 70-80% of the grid.
You'd have mass chaos and no forms of communication, along with most of the leadership killed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News