- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:37 pm to bhtigerfan
Just looks at the DOZEN plus women that "came forward" with evidence-free and decades old accusations the instant he because the republican nominee in 2016. coincidence?
How about the 5 or so women who did the same thing the second Kavanaugh because a SCOTUS nominee? We can do Clarence Thomas, and many more dating back decades. Where are they all now?
No one actually believes this anymore, but the judicial branches in these estates are so radicalized and the voters there are so partisan, that this is the result.
How about the 5 or so women who did the same thing the second Kavanaugh because a SCOTUS nominee? We can do Clarence Thomas, and many more dating back decades. Where are they all now?
No one actually believes this anymore, but the judicial branches in these estates are so radicalized and the voters there are so partisan, that this is the result.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:38 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Justice served.
Why are you a cuck in real life?
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:40 pm to Marcus Aurelius
Did you watch his deposition at DU or what?
He answered as he was asked. He probably doesn't remember her because they showed him a pic of her and he thought it was Marla.
So in his mind this old lady is not his type and he really doesn't remember.
He answered as he was asked. He probably doesn't remember her because they showed him a pic of her and he thought it was Marla.
So in his mind this old lady is not his type and he really doesn't remember.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:41 pm to WPBTiger
quote:
A federal jury in New York City reached a decision Tuesday in the civil trial of advice columnist E. Jean Carroll vs. former President Donald Trump.
The jury decided that Trump was not liable for rape, but was liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The jury awarded Carroll at least $2 million.
The six men and three women on the jury began deliberating Tuesday morning on the ninth day of the civil trial, which took place in Manhattan federal court.
Yeah that'll go well in the debates. The phrase sexual abuse as handed down by a legal authority, attached to the former President of the United States.
Sure, he'll be re-elected.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:42 pm to Marcus Aurelius
quote:
Is there anybody on here that thinks this lady completely made this up ... in other words ... she was not at the store with Trump?
huh? raping someone and being at the store at the same time as someone are two very different things. That said, she can prove neither, and given that this has become a standard and expected political ploy by democrats; I'd say YES.. most people, even libs who wont say it out loud, know this lady is lying.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:42 pm to Vacherie Saint
It also came out straightforward in the news HRC paid women $500.000.
It matters not to these people it is a crooked jury and a crooked court. The RonBots/democrats will rejoice.
It matters not to these people it is a crooked jury and a crooked court. The RonBots/democrats will rejoice.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:43 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The RonBots/
Purely in your head. Almost everyone on here that supports Desantis or any other candidate thinks this is pure bullshite and frickery by NY.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:43 pm to WPBTiger
Since when is this news? It’s not like anyone thought this wasn’t going to happen in New York. News in when something unexpectedly happens. Trump is mean we are told.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:43 pm to cajunangelle
That's right ... he said publicly that she was not his type, then thought the woman was his wife. LOL
... are Horsefaces his type? Oh, I forgot, he did not do Horseface.
... are Horsefaces his type? Oh, I forgot, he did not do Horseface.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:49 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
It matters not to these people it is a crooked jury and a crooked court.
Bragg literally ran on leveraging the courts to stop Trump from running. Laws were changed so these old ladies could sue Trump for 40 year old allegations. But the left is so lost in this country, they don’t even care…. Of course until it happens to them.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:49 pm to Vacherie Saint
You really didn't answer my question... does anybody think she was not at the store with Trump?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:51 pm to Vacherie Saint
The Bragg case is a scam. But, you also did answer mt question... do you think Trump was NOT even at the store with this women?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:51 pm to Marcus Aurelius
If she can’t say when it happened, just that she told some “beach friends” about it to reference the Kavanaugh horseshite, it is kind of hard to say whether they even met let alone were in that store together.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:52 pm to Marcus Aurelius
Wtf does my opinion about what America thinks about him being in a fricking store 100 years ago have to do with the price of tea in China?
You actually think you are going to convince reasonable people here that Trump raped this woman? Lulz.
ETA. Let me end this idiocy. What if I said that all of America believes he was in a store at the same time as this woman at some undefined moment in the 70s. That clearly makes him a rapist right? Idiot
You actually think you are going to convince reasonable people here that Trump raped this woman? Lulz.
ETA. Let me end this idiocy. What if I said that all of America believes he was in a store at the same time as this woman at some undefined moment in the 70s. That clearly makes him a rapist right? Idiot
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:53 pm to teke184
This is not about Kavanuagh, but it appears you are saying no.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:55 pm to Marcus Aurelius
It is the equivalent to “when did you stop beating your wife?”
If you can’t tell me when the incident occurred, I can’t tell you they ever met. Because meeting someone who doesn’t stand out to you won’t necessarily be remembered 30 fricking years after the fact, but you might be able to narrow it down if you can go “July 17? I was in Mar A Lago that day. Couldn’t have been there.”
If you can’t tell me when the incident occurred, I can’t tell you they ever met. Because meeting someone who doesn’t stand out to you won’t necessarily be remembered 30 fricking years after the fact, but you might be able to narrow it down if you can go “July 17? I was in Mar A Lago that day. Couldn’t have been there.”
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:55 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Any woman right now can say Trump wanted them and had sex with him 40 years ago and they would get a payday.
Then they could say he is a serial sex abuser. It is the headlines they want.
This is so weird and frightening.
Yep.
When do we -fight- back?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:56 pm to Marcus Aurelius
Well, it kinda is considering the vague, decades old, unfounded rape accusation has become as expected in American democrat politics as cries of racism.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 3:58 pm to Marcus Aurelius
Trump couldn’t/wouldn’t defend himself. He did it. But, those that support him will be happy to pay for his sexual asssult. Sad.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News