- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Religous Liberty Bill Surfaces In Georgia
Posted on 2/23/17 at 8:26 am to McLemore
Posted on 2/23/17 at 8:26 am to McLemore
quote:
would you like your bad arguments shot down too? BRB
And yours aren't. You literally equated disagreeing with stabbing someone with a coke bottle shard with disagreeing with homosexuality.
0
Posted on 2/23/17 at 3:08 pm to dawgfan24348
People in here keep making the same erouneous argument that the baker refused service to the gay person because he was gay and that's just not the case, so at least be honest. The baker was willing to serve the gay person in any other capacity, but simply didn't want to bake a wedding cake which he viewed as a form of validating same sex marriage, something his faith was against.
If we can't even be honest with the particulars of the case, it's no use.
If a divorced person had entered the bakery and said," I want a cake celebrating my 3rd divorce and the baker would have refused, it would never have been an issue.
If we can't even be honest with the particulars of the case, it's no use.
If a divorced person had entered the bakery and said," I want a cake celebrating my 3rd divorce and the baker would have refused, it would never have been an issue.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:10 pm to Revelator
quote:
If a divorced person had entered the bakery and said," I want a cake celebrating my 3rd divorce and the baker would have refused
They aren't going to refuse that person.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:11 pm to cito
quote:
They aren't going to refuse that person.
They ought to be able to, if they so chose.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:41 pm to cito
quote:
They aren't going to refuse that person.
You don't know that.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:43 pm to Revelator
quote:
You don't know that.
True, but Christians tend to view divorce and homosexuality on 2 different levels. Which I always found odd because one of them was directly addressed by jesus.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 4:48 pm to cito
quote:
True, but Christians tend to view divorce and homosexuality on 2 different levels. Which I always found odd because one of them was directly addressed by jesus.
It's not odd for at least two reasons. One, divorced people can still procreate and same sex couples can't without outside help.
Two, there are divorces that are allowable biblically. There is no such thing concerning homosexuality.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 2/23/17 at 5:00 pm to Revelator
quote:
there are divorces that are allowable biblically.
That shouldn't be plural. There is one acceptable reason for divorce that jesus talks about.
Back to the original topic...I think the issue of a business refusing service if it's coupled with a reason (race, religion, sexual orientation) then it's discrimination and the government should intervene. If the business were to say they are too busy or not accepting new clients then the government has no business forcing them to provide the service.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 5:03 pm to cito
quote:
Back to the original topic...I think the issue of a business refusing service if it's coupled with a reason (race, religion, sexual orientation) then it's discrimination and the government should intervene. If the business were to say they are too busy or not accepting new clients then the government has no business forcing them to provide the service.
I know your position. I disagree.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 5:07 pm to Revelator
That's not very Christ like. Love your neighbor. It feels good.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 5:42 pm to cito
quote:
That's not very Christ like. Love your neighbor. It feels good.
Did Christ exhibit love when he walked into the temple and overturned the money changers tables? And then he made a whip and chased them out!
Should he have simply just winked at them and walked on by?
I can love my neighbor and still not condone or enable his/ her sinful lifestyle.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:24 pm to Revelator
He seemed to be much harder on those who claimed to be his followers. They were using the temple and the Lord to turn a profit. Taking advantage of the poor. Quote," turning it into a den of thieves"
Once again, another thing jesus felt the need to address. But not homosexuality.
Once again, another thing jesus felt the need to address. But not homosexuality.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:29 pm to cito
quote:
Once again, another thing jesus felt the need to address. But not homosexuality.
Mainline Christianity has always been very consistent on the Bible's teaching on homosexuality. All denominations have steadfastly concluded that the Bible is against it.
Only in very recent years have apologists and gay advocacy groups tried to reinterpret scripture to somehow give a pass on the subject focusing on the issue of love.
If you, for whatever reason are part of this group, that's your business.
I will never condone or encourage homosexual behavior.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:25 pm to dawgfan24348
Posted on 2/23/17 at 11:17 pm to Revelator
quote:
What do you think about all female gyms that ban men from joining?
I dont care. If it ends up hurting the business, they wont do it.
The only time i care about discrimination is when it comes to employment.
Page 17 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News