- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Megyn Kelly has severly damaged her career
Posted on 11/22/16 at 10:24 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
Posted on 11/22/16 at 10:24 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
I think to everyone else, she has seriously improved her journalistic credibility.
Well that is an indictment of the stupidity of the general voting public.
0
Posted on 11/22/16 at 10:39 pm to RobbBobb
She deserves to be fired for how disrespectful she was toward President elect Trump.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 10:51 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
What a lazy analysis by the OP
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Someone is still butthurt that I schooled the absolute shite out of them, during the election cycle. All your pompous bullshite about your statistical analysis, and how Nate was right . . . . And yet we sit here tonight with Prez trump, and over 300 electoral votes. And you were condescendingly telling me how uneducated I was in refuting your analysis.
And once again you resort to your selective stats bullshite. Why did you leave out last Thurs ratings? It showed similar results. Or Fri? When Baier and The Five had more viewers in the demo? Or Tues? When Bill and Hannity beat her? And O'Reilly wasn't even on this Monday. Yet back before she tried to go all feminazi on Trump she was beating O'Reilly. Now she cant even beat his guest host
I know your pride is hurt, but saying someone who kicked you arse, did it while being lazy, says more about you, now doesn't it?
Posted on 11/22/16 at 11:03 pm to RobbBobb
I really used to like her but she made herself the central part of a story.
Posted on 11/22/16 at 11:04 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Someone is still butthurt that I schooled the absolute shite out of them, during the election cycle.
quote:Yes we do, and my prediction was wrong. But just because you predicted Trump to win, doesn't somehow negate your incorrect arguments about the processes. Just like the person who wins their NCAA bracket pool because they chose winners based on mascots is somehow more knowledgeable about basketball.
And yet we sit here tonight with Prez trump, and over 300 electoral votes.
quote:You still don't seem to understand even the basics of survey theory and probability/statistics.
And you were condescendingly telling me how uneducated I was in refuting your analysis.
quote:Because like Monday, there is an NFL game during that time slot.
Why did you leave out last Thurs ratings
quote:Because Friday night is a ratings downtime. This is why networks burn off shows on Friday night.
Or Fri? When Baier and The Five had more viewers in the demo?
I used Wednesday because it is a prime night without any major events in competition. I also used last Monday as an apples to apples comparison.
quote:Yes. It says I was willing to be less lazy and at least use multiple comparisons.
I know your pride is hurt, but saying someone who kicked you arse, did it while being lazy, says more about you, now doesn't it?
This post was edited on 11/22/16 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 11/23/16 at 12:08 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
doesn't somehow negate your incorrect arguments about the processes.
Yeah, I pretty much knew this would be your go to. Lets revisit July thru Sept, shall we? You said:
quote:
He only loses if his models are wrong. So why wouldn't he try to be as accurate as possible? Your assertion is just unsupported conjecture.
Nope. It wasn't conjecture. I knew what he was doing. And told you then. Hes a shill. And saying he was the most accurate, is laughable. he wasn't even close. he massaged his data from the get
quote:
Massage his data? The site clearly states methodology of the 3 models,
His weighting, and subjective factors are nowhere to be found. Because we knew the Trafalgar poll was out there, IBD and LA Times were too. And yet Nate ignored them, and relied on PPP, et al. Oh and while on the subject of PPP (who had Clinton at +7 in Wisc), you said:
quote:
But their inaccuracies were towards the Rs. Why are you so misinformed when it comes to polling? I honestly don't understand why you continue to be so misinformed and ignorant regarding this, yet make such absurd claims. It may not be reflective, but it's unlikely that's due to hackish polling like RobbBobb is insinuating.
I don't even need to berate you on PPP. They weren't even trying to be above board. They were push polling like a mofo. And I also posted this
quote:
I had posted on here this morning that the internals were showing a shift toward Trump in the swing states. They are beyond panic. They are whispering 2008 all over again. They don't know how to knock him off
To which you said
quote:
Well your posts regarding the 538 modeling were incorrect, despite your background.
And I replied
quote:
But it might be better to know the people that input that info onto that page, don't ya think? I know exactly how he massages his numbers in an attempt to shape opinions. Nate has been trying to shape Trumps electorate
Telling you I had someone on the inside , and you acted like you knew Hildebeast had this thing in the bank. I just lol'd
But the thing that makes me smile most mornings is this July post
quote:
Adding Fla, Ohio, and Pa, Trump wins. To get to 300 he needs to add
Iowa (Leading by 2, Monmouth)
Wisconsin (within MOE in this Blue, blue state, Marquette)
Virginia (within MOE, PPD - a dem. polling firm)
I really didn't think we could pull off Mich
Posted on 11/23/16 at 1:43 am to llfshoals
She clearly wants to make the switch to a broadcast network to do an infotainment show like Today or be a cohost of The View.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 1:45 am to RobbBobb
quote:Which you are reinforcing right now.
He only loses if his models are wrong.
quote:Well then explain it, rather than talking in vague terms.
I knew what he was doing.
quote:Much or his stata code is available on github.
His weighting, and subjective factors are nowhere to be found.
quote:They actually got it pretty close, although their polling demographics (33% black vote for Trump) were inconsistent. I'll give them credit though.
Because we knew the Trafalgar poll was out there,
quote:You do know they were pretty inaccurate, especially LA Times right?
IBD and LA Times were too.
In fact, the LA Times poll may end up the most inaccurate national poll this election. This really encapsulates your ignorance. You're actually touting one of the most inaccurate polls.
Again, if you understood the subject matter, you wouldn't use evidence against your argument as evidence for your argument.
quote:Well if you did, then you have no excuse for misunderstanding the LA Times polling inaccuracy. Moreover, you argued a point that only you can verify but wouldn't, then to this day failed to pricier any substantive information that would make it believable.
Telling you I had someone on the inside
quote:You essentially listed the battleground states as a pathway to victory. Even if you lost, winning battleground states was still the most reasonable pathway to victory. It's not some secret, although Trump campaigned in these states far better than Hillary who was wasting her time in the southwest too much.
Adding Fla, Ohio, and Pa, Trump wins.
To get to 300 he needs to add Iowa (Leading by 2, Monmouth)
Wisconsin (within MOE in this Blue, blue state, Marquette) Virginia (within MOE, PPD - a dem. polling firm)
Posted on 11/23/16 at 1:46 am to RobbBobb
Fox News should switch her and Tucker's time slots.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:30 am to FreddieMac
quote:what few concerts they are doing - sold out.
Know your audience, ask the Dixie Chicks how their career is going.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:49 am to DelU249
If fox hired that Tomi chick and put her in Megyns slot I guarantee you they'd hold the ratings for like 1/10th the salary that Megyn winds up with
Posted on 11/23/16 at 2:59 am to RobbBobb
Several times the serval-like Kelly has severely severed her relationship with her audience
Posted on 11/23/16 at 3:54 am to skinny domino
quote:
what few concerts they are doing - sold out.
There is a niche audience for virtually any bullshite.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:01 am to SirWinston
Tomi is good
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:04 am to Jcorye1
quote:
She damaged her career as soon as she made it personal with Trump. That was utter insanity on her part, and took away any chance she had of maintaining the "unbiased" viewpoint.
This along with her terrible hair style.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:33 am to FreddieMac
quote:
ask the Dixie Chicks how their career is going.
The who?
Posted on 11/23/16 at 7:37 am to RobbBobb
Let's be honest, she had a great career. Making that much as a woman supporting the republican party and getting those ratings. I mean guys surely don't listen to a woman on important things like politics. Maybe those low T Hillary supporters, but not real men.
Women Know Your Limits!
Women Know Your Limits!
This post was edited on 11/23/16 at 7:44 am
Posted on 11/23/16 at 8:17 am to RobbBobb
LMAO Yeah sure.
Posted on 11/23/16 at 8:27 am to skinny domino
quote:
what few concerts they are doing - sold out.
...in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News