- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lou Dobbs:FBI Release of 300 HRC emails looks to be smoking gun
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:39 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:39 am to cajunangelle
Lock her up!
0
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:43 am to cajunangelle
If it's a smoking gun, why didn't the FBI indict?
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:45 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:Loretta is that you?
If it's a smoking gun, why didn't the FBI indict?
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:51 am to Champagne
quote:
I believe that Obama will issue a blanket pardon for HRC.
Yeah, HRC isn't getting a pardon and nor does she want or need one.
First, it would make her look guilty like Nixon. Second, the Trump administration would be committing an unnecessary self inflicted wound by attempting to prosecute a case against her. Despite what the conservatives think, Hillary is still popular nationally and globally. It would look bad for Trump.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:54 am to Hugo Stiglitz
False if they a have a good case they need to expose things
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:56 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Despite what the conservatives think, Hillary is still popular nationally and globally. It would look bad for Trump.
People are fricking stupid. Equal Justice Under Law.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 9:58 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
If it's a smoking gun, why didn't the FBI indict?
The fix was in for Clinton. She was willing, even eager, to start World War Three on behalf of Wall Street. That is a rare commodity.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:00 am to Hugo Stiglitz
FBI doesn't indict people, genius.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:06 am to BBONDS25
Well the justice dept and Trump threatening to appoint a special prosecutor is what I was referring to.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:08 am to Hugo Stiglitz
This is probably Hillary supporters in the FBI trying to get her a pardon for this and the Clinton Foundation
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:08 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Trump threatening to appoint a special prosecutor
Nice use of the word "threat." Did Trump threaten to appoint conservatives on the Supreme Court, too?
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:08 am to Hugo Stiglitz
What? Trump has no power to appoint a special prosecutor. You said this couldn't be a smoking gun because the FBI didn't indict. Now you mean because Trump didn't appoint a prosecutor...before he has the power to do so?? Even someone as dim as you cannot actually believe the drivel you contribute. Clearly a troll. Just not very good at it. You aren't half the man Rex is.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:10 am to BBONDS25
quote:fify
What? Trump has no power to appoint a special prosecutor. You said this couldn't be a smoking gun because the FBI didn't indict. Now you mean because Trump didn't appoint a prosecutor...before he has the power to do so?? Even someone as dim as you cannot actually believe the drivel you contribute. Clearly a troll. Just not very good at it. You aren't half the troll Rex is.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:12 am to BBONDS25
A trial for Clinton will be divisive and distact from what needs to be done. President Obama will give her a pardon regardless.
This may be the best thing, that this information comes out now, while a Democrat is in the Oval Office. If it turns out that she was obviously involved in illegal pay-to-play and President Obama has to pardon both of the Clintons, then they will both be forced to go away and their political influence will be diminished. This will also increase the perceived legitimacy of the election of Donald Trump, since people will realize that a Clinton Presidency would have been one continous scandal.
This may be the best thing, that this information comes out now, while a Democrat is in the Oval Office. If it turns out that she was obviously involved in illegal pay-to-play and President Obama has to pardon both of the Clintons, then they will both be forced to go away and their political influence will be diminished. This will also increase the perceived legitimacy of the election of Donald Trump, since people will realize that a Clinton Presidency would have been one continous scandal.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:25 am to Jax-Tiger
If he pardons Hillary wouldn't he have to pardon Bill potentially also for their Foundation? Talk about a double blow to the left.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 10:26 am to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Yeah, HRC isn't getting a pardon and nor does she want or need one. First, it would make her look guilty like Nixon. Second, the Trump administration would be committing an unnecessary self inflicted wound by attempting to prosecute a case against her. Despite what the conservatives think, Hillary is still popular nationally and globally. It would look bad for Trump.
Interesting take on the matter. I appreciate your input here, because it is far superior to most of your input.
Time will tell. I'm sticking with my opinion. IMHO, Obama will have to grant a blanket pardon to HRC to protect HIMSELF rather than to protect her. We shall see.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News