Started By
Message
locked post

liar in chief TV spin: voter fraud to cover for New Hampshire loss

Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:30 am
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:30 am
LINK

liar in chief still propagandizing thet he could only lose if there were cheating.

quote:

"Do you have that evidence?" Stephanopoulos asked Miller on "This Week" Sunday.

This morning on this show is not the venue for me to lay out all the evidence. But I can tell you this, voter fraud is a serious problem in this country,” Miller said, pointing to claims of “millions of people” registered in two states, as well as deceased individuals and noncitizens registered to vote.

Stephanopoulos pressed Miller on the specific claim of fraud in New Hampshire, asking, "You just claimed again that there was illegal voting in New Hampshire, people bused in from the state of Massachusetts. Do you have evidence of that?”

“George, go to New Hampshire. Talk to anybody who’s worked in politics there for a long time. Everybody’s aware of the problem in New Hampshire,” Miller responded.

Stephanopoulos asked again, "Just for the record, you have provided absolutely no evidence. The president’s made a statement."
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 11:31 am
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28320 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:31 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 2:27 pm
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:33 am to
quote:

liar in chief


Obama isn't the President anymore.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15356 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:34 am to
I guess now you're for voter ID to prove your case.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

They should investigate and put the matter to bed.


they can repeat the lies. works for the true believers. facts don't matter.

note the repeat of the "millions" of illegal votes.

Trump claimed that he did not REALLY lose the popular vote. In two years, it will be "common knowledge".

as for investigation of the supposed bussing in of Massachusetts voters,
"everybody knows". see quoted material.

Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28320 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:37 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 2:27 pm
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22369 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:37 am to
Like they said above. Let's do a full investigation and put this issue to bed.

But the left won't do it (see Detroit recount discrepancies during Stein's recount request).
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 11:39 am
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32089 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:39 am to
quote:

liar in chief TV spin: voter fraud to cover for New Hampshire loss



Clearly this needs to be investigated from a ballot and registration perspective. Just to put it to rest. Since it bothers you so much.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:39 am to
"Hey Mike, I need you to take care of the bullshite I just stepped in. Thanks buddy!"

Poor Michael Pence
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15356 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:42 am to
quote:

they can repeat the lies. works for the true believers. facts don't matter.

note the repeat of the "millions" of illegal votes.
The fact is without voter ID there is no way to know how many there are.

That right now is the only fact.
Posted by LSU12223
Member since Sep 2016
1482 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:42 am to
I have never seen why this would be a problem
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16855 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:43 am to
quote:

liar in chief still propagandizing thet he could only lose if there were cheating.


So why not investigate?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:43 am to
Yeah, they better investigate so they can find less than 50 like they did in Michigan.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28320 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:44 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 2:26 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35363 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:45 am to
quote:

The fact is without voter ID there is no way to know how many there are.

That right now is the only fact.
Voting records are public. Seems like there would be a very very easy way to get a good number. Hint: people have done the research and the number is close to zero.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:45 am to
quote:

If it's a baseless claim, it should be easy to figure out. If there are teeth, then proceed.


Investigating if baseless claims are, in fact, baseless is a complete waste of time and resources.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:46 am to
quote:

But the left won't do it (see Detroit recount discrepancies during Stein's recount request).


wtf are you talking about, Mitch McConnell was the one who said 'we will not be spending money on a voter fraud investigation'

why

cuz it doesnt happen like this idiot lying in chief says.
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Hampshire loss by graychef If one is asking for evidence of voter fraud, should there be an investigation? I ask seriously. If it's a baseless claim, it should be easy to figure out. If there are teeth, then proceed.

Outrageous claims require solid evidence.

I could say there are green men living on mars. Should we procede with the multi-trillion dollar investigation to find out or might it make more sense for me to simply provide my source.

You can play these games only for so long.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:47 am to
quote:

So why not investigate?


Claims are still being made that Trump is just a puppet in bed with Putin, why not just investigate?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36748 posts
Posted on 2/12/17 at 11:47 am to
quote:

I have never seen why this would be a problem

I think it could be done but it's not as simple as saying voting requires Id. They'd need free id programs, notice to voters, workers to get people ids. Standards developed on what counts and what doesnt. Still nothing preventing me from voting in two states though even with id requirements as is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram