Started By
Message
locked post

LGB is one thing but T? C'mon!

Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:57 pm
Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:57 pm
I get that letting people fire someone for something as trivial as sexual preference is not acceptable, but should we really allow people to waltz into their office, dressed like a woman, and say, "I go by Cindy now!". There's gotta be a limit. And what the hell is the Q they add in at the end now?
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:01 pm to
Their literature says Q stands for both queer and questioning (as in questioning their sexuality).
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:02 pm to
Q is questioning. We've had this discussion on the PT a few times before.

I've come to the conclusion that questioning is an adminission that the gay is more environmental and less genetic. That is, WTF are you doing questioning if you are born that way? If you are questioning, you are gay.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:04 pm to
Not worth it
This post was edited on 7/30/14 at 9:06 pm
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37732 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:04 pm to
I've always wondered if normal everyday gay people cringe at the thought of being lumped in with the T of the acronym.
Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:04 pm to
So people are getting fired for questioning their sexuality? Doubt it. They're just being drama queens at this point. Don't fire people for what they do on their own time. Cool. No need to label everything but draw the line at transgender.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:07 pm to
My business ethics prof was a pre-op tranny. She looked like a 14 year old boy. The last TWO frickING WEEKS of class were spent "educating" us on the merits of T-hiring. The major debate was "if you hire a woman, but she becomes a man, can you fire him?"
Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:09 pm to
Yeah, we hired you to represent the company in a certain manner and you no longer do that.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34651 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

"if you hire a woman, but she becomes a man, do you have to give him a raise?"



Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:15 pm to
well done!
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

WTF are you doing questioning if you are born that way? If you are questioning, you are gay.

IKR

sack up for frick's sake
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:15 am to
quote:

quote:
"if you hire a woman, but she becomes a man, do you have to give him a raise?"





Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8396 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:17 am to
quote:

FightinTigersDammit
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40124 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 12:17 am to
quote:

LGB is one thing but T? C'mon!


If you have a penis you are a male use the male bathroom. If you have a vagina you are a female use the female bathroom. If you have both, well I am sure you can make alot of $$$ in porn. (and you would take the term go freak yourself to a new level).
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:56 am to
quote:

but should we really allow people to waltz into their office, dressed like a woman, and say, "I go by Cindy now!".


Yes.

quote:

There's gotta be a limit.


The limit doesn't involve you dictating someone's gender to them.
quote:

And what the hell is the Q they add in at the end now?


They added that just to piss you off.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:57 am to
quote:


I've come to the conclusion that questioning is an adminission that the gay is more environmental and less genetic



And as with most things, your conclusions don't really follow from the data in question (in this case, the character 'Q').
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 4:58 am
Posted by reverendotis
the jawbone of an arse
Member since Nov 2007
4867 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 7:09 am to
quote:

The limit doesn't involve you dictating someone's gender to them.


I don't need to, their father's X or Y chromosome already dictated their gender to them.

The fact that they choose to behave as the opposite sex is unfortunate, just like any other person whose underlying mental disorder manifests itself in their actions.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26636 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 7:17 am to
The limit is when any employee's actions hinder his/her ability to do the job, become a distraction to other employees or customers, or cost the business money.
Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:18 am to
I don't have to dictate gender. It's there already. If someone wakes up an decides, "wonder what having a vag is like", and that's not something you like in your car salesman, then you should be allowed to fire the guy.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52787 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

The limit doesn't involve you dictating someone's gender to them


Gender can not be dictated. You either or, or you are not. If you have a penis, you are a male. If you have a vagina, you are a female. Why can't you liberals understand basic anatomy? Why are you even questioning the most basic elements of life?

It's astounding the stupidity that comes from the left.
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 8:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram