- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Legal weed or reigning in illegal immigration
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:51 pm
Which of these would you choose?
21
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:52 pm to joshnorris14
How is that even a question?! Reigning in the illegals, of course.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:52 pm to joshnorris14
Weed, duh.
Then we can have all the illegals work on the weed farms.
Then we can have all the illegals work on the weed farms.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:52 pm to joshnorris14
Legalize em both
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:53 pm to joshnorris14
Why not both?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:53 pm to MrLarson
Why not both?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:53 pm to Iosh
quote:
Legalize em both
Legalize illegal immigration?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:53 pm to joshnorris14
Why not both? Those are issues that are completely intertwined.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:54 pm to MrLarson
Because that's not the question?
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:55 pm to joshnorris14
B easily IMO.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:56 pm to Manzielathon
quote:
Weed, duh.
Then we can have all the illegals work on the weed farms.
You should run for office.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:57 pm to joshnorris14
quote:But it's a false dichotomy then. You could at least ask which is a bigger priority, in that case the WOD since I think it also relates to illegal immigration.
Because that's not the question?
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:58 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 3/27/17 at 12:59 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Because that's not the question?
Only a Sith deals in absolutes
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:00 pm to buckeye_vol
I would argue that the dichotomy is not false in practical reality
I don't think many AGs are capable of what Sessions is on the immigration front. I think if it was someone other than him, we'd fail to reign it in.
I don't think many AGs are capable of what Sessions is on the immigration front. I think if it was someone other than him, we'd fail to reign it in.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:00 pm to NOFOX
quote:I suppose that's why I'm comfortable doing so
Only a Sith deals in absolutes
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:02 pm to joshnorris14
What made you arrive at these two choices?
No-brainer for me. America, just like every other sovereign nation, has a right to both implement and enforce laws against illegal immigration.
No-brainer for me. America, just like every other sovereign nation, has a right to both implement and enforce laws against illegal immigration.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:02 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Which is why SFP (I think) said that Sessions could have been placed in a position that deal directly with immigration.
I don't think many AGs are capable of what Sessions is on the immigration front. I think if it was someone other than him, we'd fail to reign it in.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:02 pm to buckeye_vol
He is
Posted on 3/27/17 at 1:03 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
in that case the WOD since I think it also relates to illegal immigration.
True,
When Pedro is no longer needed to mule weed across the desert you will see a reduction in illegal immigration. The cartels aren't going to strap 10 kg of blow on Pedro's back.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News