- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Julian Assange Defends Sean Hannity
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:25 pm
Julian Assange? @JulianAssange 3h3 hours ago
(1/2) On @SeanHannity: regardless of the politics no one should be cheering advertisers controlling the parameters of acceptable debate.
Julian Assange? @JulianAssange 3h3 hours ago
(2/2) We take any allegation that an alleged source has come to harm seriously. Murder should not be downplayed or instrumentalized.
Why is Julian Assange going out of his way to address the murder of Seth Rich?
Why is the lib media so rattled about this?
Why is the lib media going out of their way to silence Kim Dotcom?
Where was the lib media when Seth Rich was murdered?
Did the DNC do anything to help find the person who murdered of one of their own?
Why does the lib media care so much now?
How much you wanna bet the lib media and ever lib here would be supporting Kim Dotcom if he said he had evidence of Russia Trump collusion? Kim Dotcom would be front and center on every lib media channel.
(1/2) On @SeanHannity: regardless of the politics no one should be cheering advertisers controlling the parameters of acceptable debate.
Julian Assange? @JulianAssange 3h3 hours ago
(2/2) We take any allegation that an alleged source has come to harm seriously. Murder should not be downplayed or instrumentalized.
Why is Julian Assange going out of his way to address the murder of Seth Rich?
Why is the lib media so rattled about this?
Why is the lib media going out of their way to silence Kim Dotcom?
Where was the lib media when Seth Rich was murdered?
Did the DNC do anything to help find the person who murdered of one of their own?
Why does the lib media care so much now?
How much you wanna bet the lib media and ever lib here would be supporting Kim Dotcom if he said he had evidence of Russia Trump collusion? Kim Dotcom would be front and center on every lib media channel.
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 2:26 pm
18
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:27 pm to Langland
HE IS TROLLING THE frick OUT OF YALL
hope that helps
hope that helps
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:32 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
HE IS TROLLING THE frick OUT OF YALL
Dude, you don't know Jack Squat.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:33 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
HE IS TROLLING THE frick OUT OF YALL
hope that helps
Does the typical troll have a legal team and is willing to testify under oath?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:34 pm to Langland
Sean Hannity?Verified account
@seanhannity
Sean Hannity Retweeted National Enquirer
Big thank you to @NatEnquirer for correcting the record from recent publication. Unlike many in media, they investigated the truth& made fix
5:22 AM - 24 May 2017
@seanhannity
Sean Hannity Retweeted National Enquirer
Big thank you to @NatEnquirer for correcting the record from recent publication. Unlike many in media, they investigated the truth& made fix
5:22 AM - 24 May 2017
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:36 pm to Pettifogger
If you don't think there's a real possibility that Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leaks to WikiLeaks then you're blind. Way more evidence (some circumstantial) than Russia being the source.
When it's proven that Seth Rich was the source of the DNC "hack" (Assange has already alluded to him being the source), the last 5 months of CNN coverage will be proven to have been a lie. The media will shite itself when this Russia narrative falls apart. They'll actually have to cover what the Trump admin is doing rather than distract from it.
When it's proven that Seth Rich was the source of the DNC "hack" (Assange has already alluded to him being the source), the last 5 months of CNN coverage will be proven to have been a lie. The media will shite itself when this Russia narrative falls apart. They'll actually have to cover what the Trump admin is doing rather than distract from it.
This post was edited on 5/25/17 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:36 pm to Langland
quote:
Murder should not be downplayed or instrumentalized.
How is the murder of Seth Rich in any respect being downplayed? What's being ridiculed is the absurdity of the conspiracy theory which is being instrumentalized by the likes of Hannity.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:37 pm to Langland
quote:
regardless of the politics no one should be cheering advertisers controlling the parameters of acceptable debate.
This is how they control free speech. You can say anything you want but you'll being doing it poor and unemployed.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:39 pm to cwill
Wait for CNN to call Seth a Russian plant, and the attempt to frame his death on the FBI, by stealing and using their guns...
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:40 pm to CamdenTiger
Wow. National Enquirer will print a retraction but not Washington Post.
That's where we are folks.
That's where we are folks.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:42 pm to Langland
quote:
How much you wanna bet the lib media and ever lib here would be supporting Kim Dotcom if he said he had evidence of Russia Trump collusion? Kim Dotcom would be front and center on every lib media channel.
Undoubtedly!
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:42 pm to KCT
quote:
Dude, you don't know Jack Squat.
Isn't Jack Squat the liaison Kimdotcom told us about between Panda and himself?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:44 pm to Langland
quote:
Does the typical troll have a legal team and is willing to testify under oath?
Who, Assange?
I assume you're talking about the fat NZ troll
Outlaw tech dorks, socialists, Russians - is there anyone who Trump fans won't adore if they look their way?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:45 pm to Haydo
quote:
If you don't think there's a real possibility that Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leaks to WikiLeaks then you're blind. Way more evidence (some circumstantial) than Russia being the source.
There is zero evidence other than Assange hinting at it
Which gets people like yall hot and bothered
Which gets you to talk about conspiracies and revolution and to hate your government even more than you did previously
Which is what Assange wants
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:46 pm to Haydo
quote:
If you don't think there's a real possibility that Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leaks to WikiLeaks then you're blind. Way more evidence (some circumstantial) than Russia being the source.
Julian Assange has repeatedly stated that Wikileaks received no information from Russia with regards to the DNC fiasco
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:46 pm to Langland
If Assange believes Rich was murdered because he was the source of email that Assange possess, then he is an accessory to murder. Bold strategy.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:46 pm to JuiceTerry
I'm... not sure accessory charges work that way
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:46 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Julian Assange has repeatedly stated that Wikileaks received no information from Russia with regards to the DNC fiasco
Convenient for a guy who had a show on Russian state television to say such a thing
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:51 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
If Assange believes Rich was murdered because he was the source of email that Assange possess, then he is an accessory to murder. Bold strategy.
I don't know about accessory to murder but Assange could help put this mess to rest if he gave verification that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks source
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:51 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
There is zero evidence other than Assange hinting at it
And also saying that Russia is not the source. Wikileaks, throughout this entire ordeal over the past year, has never been wrong, never published any false documents, and never had to retract any statement or any publication they have made.
So why should I not believe Assange when the US media does nothing but constantly lie and make allegations based on falsehoods?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News