Started By
Message
locked post

Is there a country you'd support bombing back to the stone age after Jan 20?

Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:19 am
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51817 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:19 am
Saudi Arabia comes to mind.


frick them, right in their pussy.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55533 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:21 am to
No. I would simply prefer to eliminate all foreign aid and subsequently enforce existing rules about foreign nations lobbying (I'm looking at you, Saudis and Israelis).
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37950 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:21 am to
Every single country that borders it would be nice too
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Is there a country you'd support bombing back to the stone age after Jan 20?



No. Time to do some withdrawl and handover to regional partners. If Russia wants to bomb the Saudis back to the stone age, I can't say I'd make a peep.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127114 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Is there a country you'd support bombing back to the stone age after Jan 20?
Alabama???
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51817 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:25 am to
You guys are right. My bullying side is coming out this morning.


Cut the money and weapons off and let the people over there do the work for us.

Gotta keep Iran in check somehow though.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
135178 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:28 am to
And you're pissing and moaning about the neocon war hawks
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17321 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:28 am to
None but, I would love to see foreign aid ended and that we stop defending bad actors with our military.

Play nice with the USA or you don't get jack shite from us anymore.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124545 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Is there a country you'd support bombing back to the stone age after Jan 20?
Alabama???
That would be a waste of ordnances. Alabama is already "back to the stone age."
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55533 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Gotta keep Iran in check somehow though.



The biggest reason for Iranian antagonism is that we have essentially sided with Sunnis (specifically, holding up the House of Saud) and, well, initiated a coup.

I understand the reasoning behind our geopolitical posturing and actions over the past half century, but it is starting to appear that it is not a viable long-term solution or strategy.

Unfortunately, even if we abandon much of our activities in other countries, we will still have lingering resentment for a while.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71745 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Saudi Arabia


Save the bombs. They're already in the Stone Age.

Dangit, NC beat me to it.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 10:47 am
Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:44 am to
quote:

quote:Is there a country you'd support bombing back to the stone age after Jan 20?


quote:

Alabama???


Aren't they still in the stone age? Seems so, sometimes.

Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55533 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:45 am to
"Rednecks making fun of other rednecks for being rednecks since 2008"
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51817 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Aren't they still in the stone age? Seems so, sometimes.



You do realize there are parts of your own damn state that still don't speak English, right?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112720 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:46 am to
Uzbekistan. Because that's where Borat says all the assholes live.
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
40799 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Saudi Arabia
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27053 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:49 am to
Nope.

Just get the frick out of everywhere. Stop trying to fix the most horrendous parts of the globe. Stop trying to reason with people who still stone and behead people.

Maintain!!!! Maintain strategic points (bases). And maintain security. Security of our homeland only. Just GTFO of the Middle East. I'm ok with my gas prices fluctuating wildly. We will STILL get oil. Saudi will see to that. I'll pay 3-4 bucks a gallon if it means less or zero soldiers come home in boxes.

If forced to answer the OP? North Korea. If anything comes out of North Korean airspace, travels more than 100 miles and doesn't have a person on it? Probably take 3 missles.
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:50 am to
Saudi Arabia needs to be conquered
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:50 am to
quote:


No. Time to do some withdrawl and handover to regional partners. If Russia wants to bomb the Saudis back to the stone age, I can't say I'd make a peep.


along with building a great big beautiful wall
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2918 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Alabama??? 


quote:

That would be a waste of ordnances. Alabama is already "back to the stone age.


quote:

Aren't they still in the stone age? Seems so, sometimes. 


Seems like some you need to research where those bombs and missles are made.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram