Started By
Message
locked post

In-Game Thread- Justice Department IG Testifies on FISA Abuse Allegations

Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:26 am
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20280 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:26 am
Hearing starts at 9am cst in the Senate Judiciary Committee

C-SPAN
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 8:37 am
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6207 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:27 am to
In!
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:27 am to
Posted by autauga
Member since Sep 2015
3655 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:29 am to
House or Senate?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43341 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:29 am to
10 Eastern for us Eastern folks.

Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20280 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:29 am to
According to C-SPAN, it’s hosted by the Senate
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6207 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:29 am to
Senate
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6207 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:30 am to
10am too early for wings n beers?
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:30 am to
Stuck in meetings. Hope you guys give the highlights.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34959 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:32 am to
Cruz v Horrowitz. That will interesting.

Hard to believe that Horrowitz comes out with a 'no criminal intent' assessment. Believe my or your lying eyes. Guess he's got dirt too.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43341 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:33 am to
quote:

10am too early for wings n beers?




Of course not. This is 'Murica.

Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20280 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:34 am to
I think he is going to be very careful with his words today. Barr and Durham, being so outspoken prior to this testimony, tells me they are signaling to him to be careful with what you say, you don’t know what we know
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 8:39 am
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131420 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:34 am to
9am our time or eastern?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43341 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:36 am to
9AM Central, 10AM Eastern.

Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54213 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:38 am to
quote:

10am too early for wings n beers?



What's the old saying - it's five o'clock somewhere. Indulge thyself.
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6207 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:39 am to
I wish he would say he had to shorten his investigation because it led to a man who isn’t president any longer.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73862 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:41 am to
This gonna be another snooze fest where Nancy claims victory and this boards goes into depression claiming nothing will happen?
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6207 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:44 am to
Nancy won’t be there
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34959 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:44 am to
quote:

I think he is going to be very careful with his words today. Barr and Durham, being so outspoken prior to this testimony, tells me they are signaling to him to be careful with what you say, you don’t know what we know


Good point, B. Barr leaves no doubt that blatant lies like Comey's "no intent" re Hillary's destruction of Subpoenaed evidence...or Biden's overt blackmail of Ukrainian Investigators of his Son's corruption, will no longer be accommodated.

It's either a common standard of Rule of Law and Equal Justice...or a streetfight. One that the 'Militias' will win; but not after serious pain for all of us. Lets hope and pray they get honest up there.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15428 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Hard to believe that Horrowitz comes out with a 'no criminal intent' assessment.


My guess, considering the Barr / Durham strong position, in public no less, that there is evidence of bad faith, Horowitz doesn’t directly contradict them. He equivocates.

I’d bet he testifies (essentially), that, while there was no direct evidence (ie admissions by the witnesses he interviewed) if Barr or Durham find that evidence of bad faith or political bias motivated the FBI decision making/misfeasance/malfeasance, he would not dispute; and further, there is room for an inference of illegal intent from the text messages of the lovers, but making that inference is beyond his scope.

Or at least that would be the best day for Ms. Lindsey and company.

There’s just no way he flat out says Barr/Durham are wrong. He’s a swamp thing. So he’s intellectually lazy and chicken shite about taking an actual position.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 8:46 am
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 30
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 30Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram