- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians
Posted on 7/14/17 at 2:31 pm to goldennugget
Posted on 7/14/17 at 2:31 pm to goldennugget
quote:If there was collusion, an initial meeting and communication had to take place at some point. So that may support the idea that collusion wasn't occurring before the meeting, but it definitely doesn't eliminate the possibility from that date onward.
Why would Don Jr. & Co. Feel the need to set up a meeting with random Russian figures
Wouldn't have Russians already been a part of the campaign by then
And it also doesn't mean that other members of the campaign weren't involved in collusion activities prior to that.
But I think it's reasonable to say that IF collusion occurred, it far more likely that it didn't occur before that meeting date.
This post was edited on 7/14/17 at 2:32 pm
0
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:05 pm to ibleedprplngld
quote:
Jr having heard about collusion stories and the media narrative and two very different things.
Jr said he had not heard the media "Russian narrative" before he took the meeting. You don't think he was up to speed on what was being said about his Dad? You're defending a complete and total liar.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:08 pm to goldennugget
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/5/20 at 7:30 am
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:17 pm to Salmon
quote:
If you are gathering information on your opponent, you're going to turn down information because you have enough?
No. That isn't logical.
Why wouldn't you go to the original Russian you colluded with? I'm sure they could provide the same information. But yet, let's set up a meeting with another Russian source that we know nothing about. How many sects of Russians were there wanting to disseminate info on Hillary? Shouldn't all Russians be on the same team?
Yeah, sounds real logical.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:19 pm to Lg
quote:
Why wouldn't you go to the original Russian you colluded with? I'm sure they could provide the same information.
You're sure of that? How would you know that?
quote:
But yet, let's set up a meeting with another Russian source that we know nothing about.
Well...they did just that
quote:
How many sects of Russians were there wanting to disseminate info on Hillary? Shouldn't all Russians be on the same team?
Are we all on the same team? Do we all share the same info?
quote:
Yeah, sounds real logical.
Nothing you said makes sense.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:20 pm to SquirrelyBama
quote:
Don't bring logic into this, the sheep have been lead elsewhere. Anyone capable of thinking for themselves
Puhlease. Your side has been lobotimized to call everything that isn't Pro Trump as "fake news." You can't even acknowledge that Jr clearly set up a meeting with collusion in mind.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:24 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Uh.. when did he lie about it? Is he supposed to remember every single person who was at every single meeting he's ever had? Honestly. Is he
Absolutely.
Believe it or not, this is a serious job for serious people. You have elected the East Coast Kardashians so....it's clearly too hard for them. MYbe they should stick to the tabloids.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:25 pm to Salmon
quote:
You're sure of that? How would you know that?
That was your words. To gather MORE information. So if they are gathering more wouldn't they already have some? I meant that's what you think collusion is.
quote:
Well...they did just that
Yep. Oppo research.
quote:
Are we all on the same team?
Nope. And the more I think about it, if Russia was trying to take down our Democracy, wouldn't that be in the interest of the Left, since you all want to do the same.
quote:
Nothing you said makes sense.
About as much as you do.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:26 pm to Lg
quote:
Shouldn't all Russians be on the same team?
That doesn't mean they don't want to get as many compromised resources as possible.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:26 pm to a want
quote:
You have elected the East Coast Kardashians so
I'm honestly worried about you. Maybe step away for a few days. It's going to be ok, man.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:27 pm to Lg
quote:
o if they are gathering more wouldn't they already have some?
Yeah. So answer how they would know that this other person has the same information?
quote:
Yep. Oppo research.
Ok. So why would they turn down more oppo research?
quote:
. And the more I think about it, if Russia was trying to take down our Democracy, wouldn't that be in the interest of the Left, since you all want to do the same.
Anymore strawmen you want to toss my way?
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:28 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
compromised resources as possible.
So this looks more like collusion between the Russians and the left to take down Trump, right? Why else would you want to compromise the one you want to win?
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:31 pm to Salmon
quote:
So answer how they would know that this other person has the same information?
That's what collusion is. If Trump is colluding with the Russian government, and this so called attorney is working for the Russian government why wouldn't she have the same information? Are you dense?
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:32 pm to Salmon
quote:
So why would they turn down more oppo research?
There wasn't any. That's why the meeting turned to the adoption deal.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:32 pm to Lg
quote:
That's what collusion is
I don't think you know what collusion is
quote:
If Trump is colluding with the Russian government, and this so called attorney is working for the Russian government why wouldn't she have the same information? Are you dense?
Everyone in the US government has the same information and sources? This is what you are going with?
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:33 pm to Lg
quote:
there wasn't any. That's why the meeting turned to the adoption deal.
I don't think you are following.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:34 pm to Lg
It's fun watching these leftists in here breaking their backs over a meeting which liberal legal experts have deemed totally legal.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:35 pm to texag7
Have I stated it wasn't legal?
The OP posed the theoretical. By the basis of this thread by the OP, we are assuming collusion is true.
Try to keep up.
The OP posed the theoretical. By the basis of this thread by the OP, we are assuming collusion is true.
Try to keep up.
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:37 pm to Salmon
So you're arguing over something that's totally legal? You must be bored
Posted on 7/14/17 at 3:37 pm to texag7
quote:
It's fun watching these leftists in here breaking their backs over a meeting which liberal legal experts have deemed totally legal.
Jesus
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News