Started By
Message
locked post

If the election result was the opposite, would we be hearing about hacking

Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:53 am
Posted by DyeHardDylan
Member since Nov 2011
7730 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:53 am
From the administration? Would there have been an investigation? My guess is no.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:53 am to
No

Next question
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16864 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

If the election result was the opposite, would we be hearing about hacking



Maybe. They'd still have to deflect from the content of those emails, collusion with media personalities, and the rigging of the primary.
Posted by NorthGwinnett LSU
Georgia Southern Fan
Member since Nov 2012
1917 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:54 am to
you already know the answer to that.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39488 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:55 am to
No. it's not even a question.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:56 am to
I mean they would have to address the fact as to who leaked their emails, so I would assume "yes" it would be an issue.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 10:57 am
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105413 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:57 am to
Lol

No, of course not.

We would just see a reset button.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48359 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:57 am to
Was US cybersecurity an issue before HRC lost?

Obama knew that HRC's email operation was unsecure and outside of US Govt cyber-security protection for years. Did Obama care to instruct HRC to make a change?

No.

This is pure Democrat Political Theater.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

No

Next question



So if Hillary had won, the democrats wouldn't be concerned that they were compromised?

I'm asking seriously. You think they'd just blow it off?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48359 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

I mean they would have to address the fact as to who leaked their emails,


At this point you are simply being contrarian.

Obama knew for years that HRC's email operations were on a private server and completely unprotected by US Govt cyber-security. Obama never cared enough about the issue to ask HRC to make a change.

This is pure Democrat Political Theater, and you are a simple "extra" on that stage.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I'm asking seriously. You think they'd just blow it off?


It'd be like page 12 news. Barely warranting a 10 second blurb on the major news networks. No diplomats would have been ejected from the country, no sanctions levied against Russia and no threads on TD about it.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:05 am to
quote:

be like page 12 news. Barely warranting a 10 second blurb on the major news networks. No diplomats would have been ejected from the country, no sanctions levied against Russia and no threads on TD about it.


So the MSM who is in cahoots with the DNC would relegate an international espionage ring that specifically targeted them to page 12?

Like, they wouldn't want the world to know another country tried to make them lose an election and they still prevailed?

Why? What sense does that make? They'd broadcast that from the highest rooftops.
Posted by Bad Medicine
Member since Aug 2014
3575 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:08 am to
It would be nothing more than a joke in the media. It would be laughed off as a non story
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Why? What sense does that make? They'd broadcast that from the highest rooftops.

They'd bury the frick out of it because they wouldn't want the content of the emails to even be considered. The only reason we're hearing about it now is political gamesmanship to discredit Trump
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101436 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:10 am to
quote:

LesMiles BFF



Trying way too hard.
Posted by PhillyTiger90
Member since Dec 2015
10687 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:11 am to
Nope

CNN, WaPo, NPR and the rest of the libs would be mocking us and replaying that infamous Obama "the 80s called about their foreign policy" quote daily



Posted by Macfly
BR & DS
Member since Jan 2016
8080 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:12 am to
Winning removes the need to blame anyone.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

They'd bury the frick out of it because they wouldn't want the content of the emails to even be considered


But the content was already out there before the election so the cat is out of the bag. I'm just not following your logic.

quote:

The only reason we're hearing about it now is political gamesmanship to discredit Trump


I think we're hearing about it because we have intelligence agencies telling the future leader of our country that a foreign country actively tried to influence our elections and he's getting in front of the camera and saying "I'm smarter than the CIA".

Am I missing something?
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:13 am to
Not a word
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Y.A. Tittle


You landed on the hack list a long time ago.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram