- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I tried to tell you that theDonald had the goods on Obama before tweets about wiretapping
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:07 am
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:07 am
I think I told you that right after Gorsuch got confirmed, shite would get real
PoliBoard - 12 days ago
So Let's review:
Jan 20th - Trump sworn in
Jan 21st - Theresa May is 'invited' to the WH
Jan 24th - GHCQ director resigns for 'personal' reasons
Mar 4th - Trump tweets about Obama spying
Mar 14th - Judge Napolitano of FoxNews claims “three intelligence sources” say Obama got British spies GCHQ to obtain transcripts
Mar 15th - Obama heads to Tahiti for a month
Mar 16th - GCHQ vehemently denies intel on Trump
Mar 20th - Judge Napolitano suspended
Mar 29th - Judge Napolitano reinstated
Apr 3rd - Susan Rice confirmed as unmasker of Trump associates. She claims that no US laws were violated (but fails to mention GCHQ involvement, as end around US laws)
Apr 10th - Gorsuch sworn in
Apr 11th - Confirmation of a FISA warrant on Trump advisor Carter Page - WaPo
Apr 13th - CNN and The Guardian confirm that GCHQ began the entire collecting of data on the Trump campaign, and passed that info to US
But Mr. Bobb, I'm so confused? What are you trying to tell me?
Trump needed names, dates, agencies and told May to get it. So she scheduled her visit, and started asking questions back home. Richard Hannigan resigns 2 days later. So he either got caught with his hand in the cookie jar, or was fired for allowing it to happen. May then goes to DC to get an earful from Trump. She returns home, promising him the info he wants. Info is later supplied
Trump reviews it, and then blasts out his GLORIOUS tweets. His people deliver some of the goods to the Judge. He airs it on FoxNews and gets suspended. He has a little sit down with ole Rupert Murdoch (Australian of God Save the Queen legacy), and says he will sue, have his day in court, and will use UK documents in his defense, and will not accept an out of court settlement. The Judge is reinstated. He doubles down on his statement that got him suspended
Senate is asking Trump to calm the waters to allow them get Gorsuch confirmed without going nuclear. It fails. Trump now moves on to other pressing issues (Syria, NK, China, Afghanistan) Yet suddenly CNN (Trump haters) and The Guardian (GCHQ lovers) both confirm, seemingly out of nowhere, that the Brits were the ones that started all the spying on Trump way back in 2015. Yet none of the Russian colluders were in Trump's advisory circle in 2015. Well, that's just plain odd.
So within just a couple days of Gorsuch joining the court we get an admission of a FISA on Trump associates, and that Britain was indeed funneling info to BHO on Trump.
Wait until America finds out that GCHQ had Trump Towers wired. Because that is what foreign intel agencies do to other world leaders, after all? And guess who got copies of their intel?
PoliBoard - 12 days ago
So Let's review:
Jan 20th - Trump sworn in
Jan 21st - Theresa May is 'invited' to the WH
Jan 24th - GHCQ director resigns for 'personal' reasons
Mar 4th - Trump tweets about Obama spying
Mar 14th - Judge Napolitano of FoxNews claims “three intelligence sources” say Obama got British spies GCHQ to obtain transcripts
Mar 15th - Obama heads to Tahiti for a month
Mar 16th - GCHQ vehemently denies intel on Trump
Mar 20th - Judge Napolitano suspended
Mar 29th - Judge Napolitano reinstated
Apr 3rd - Susan Rice confirmed as unmasker of Trump associates. She claims that no US laws were violated (but fails to mention GCHQ involvement, as end around US laws)
Apr 10th - Gorsuch sworn in
Apr 11th - Confirmation of a FISA warrant on Trump advisor Carter Page - WaPo
Apr 13th - CNN and The Guardian confirm that GCHQ began the entire collecting of data on the Trump campaign, and passed that info to US
But Mr. Bobb, I'm so confused? What are you trying to tell me?
Trump needed names, dates, agencies and told May to get it. So she scheduled her visit, and started asking questions back home. Richard Hannigan resigns 2 days later. So he either got caught with his hand in the cookie jar, or was fired for allowing it to happen. May then goes to DC to get an earful from Trump. She returns home, promising him the info he wants. Info is later supplied
Trump reviews it, and then blasts out his GLORIOUS tweets. His people deliver some of the goods to the Judge. He airs it on FoxNews and gets suspended. He has a little sit down with ole Rupert Murdoch (Australian of God Save the Queen legacy), and says he will sue, have his day in court, and will use UK documents in his defense, and will not accept an out of court settlement. The Judge is reinstated. He doubles down on his statement that got him suspended
Senate is asking Trump to calm the waters to allow them get Gorsuch confirmed without going nuclear. It fails. Trump now moves on to other pressing issues (Syria, NK, China, Afghanistan) Yet suddenly CNN (Trump haters) and The Guardian (GCHQ lovers) both confirm, seemingly out of nowhere, that the Brits were the ones that started all the spying on Trump way back in 2015. Yet none of the Russian colluders were in Trump's advisory circle in 2015. Well, that's just plain odd.
So within just a couple days of Gorsuch joining the court we get an admission of a FISA on Trump associates, and that Britain was indeed funneling info to BHO on Trump.
Wait until America finds out that GCHQ had Trump Towers wired. Because that is what foreign intel agencies do to other world leaders, after all? And guess who got copies of their intel?
17
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:12 am to RobbBobb
Getty-up
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:15 am to RobbBobb
Obama got too cute by half. Watch the Gunt squirm.
Good job, Mr. Bobb.
Good job, Mr. Bobb.
This post was edited on 4/14/17 at 11:17 am
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:20 am to RobbBobb
Wait until noting comes out of this and congrats for wasting a few hours of your life making up PB BS, idiot.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:22 am to Sody Cracker
quote:
Obama got too cute by half.
Yes. By involving other intel agencies, he thought he could get away with not 'violating' US laws. But where he failed in his estimation is, the law both covers obtaining AND disseminating
So it doesn't matter that the intel came from the UK, he had no authority to unmask names of Americans who he had not directly obtained intel on. Unmasking is only afforded to the IC when they are the collectors of said data
So Rice just blatantly and brazenly disseminated taped conversations of American citizens from foreign sources. Illegal
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:23 am to ellishughtiger
quote:
congrats for wasting a few hours of your life making up PB BS
If only you knew
This post was edited on 4/14/17 at 11:24 am
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:23 am to RobbBobb
Great info. I want the MF'er to be completely humiliated, at a minimum.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:24 am to RobbBobb
quote:
CNN (Trump haters) and The Guardian (GCHQ lovers) both confirm, seemingly out of nowhere, that the Brits were the ones that started all the spying on Trump way back in 2015. Yet none of the Russian colluders were in Trump's advisory circle in 2015.
Muh Limeys.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:32 am to RobbBobb
There was never any doubt Obama tapped his wires. President TRUMP said he did.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:32 am to AUstar
Okay so what actually happens after all of the above? It seems like it will totsllly blow over and be forgotten.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:33 am to AUstar
quote:
RobbBobb, not sure if you read the post I made last night or if you and I just think alike
Nice
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:37 am to RobbBobb
It is hilarious how you guys only cherry pick the details you want to hear from this reporting. Let's add a few details to your assessment:
1.) The FBI and Intel community at large has stated flatly that there is no validity to Trump's claims
2.) The recent report on the Brits clearly stated it was incidental collection from surveillance on Russian nationals that led to the information being uncovered
3.) The FBI has stated it has an open investigation on the Trump campaign for collusion with a foreign adversary
4.) The facts that Trump officials comms were incidentally collected from surveillance on foreign agents means that...WAIT FOR IT...it is CONFIRMED that Trump officials were communicating with agents of the Russian government during the campaign.
1.) The FBI and Intel community at large has stated flatly that there is no validity to Trump's claims
2.) The recent report on the Brits clearly stated it was incidental collection from surveillance on Russian nationals that led to the information being uncovered
3.) The FBI has stated it has an open investigation on the Trump campaign for collusion with a foreign adversary
4.) The facts that Trump officials comms were incidentally collected from surveillance on foreign agents means that...WAIT FOR IT...it is CONFIRMED that Trump officials were communicating with agents of the Russian government during the campaign.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:39 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
It seems like it will totsllly blow over and be forgotten.
This will likely happen but it will also happen at the cost of the muh russia narrative sharing the same fate as well. Democrats and the MSM will gladly give it up to protect Obama and their party.
Anyway, the left's melt will be tremendous in the very, very likely event that the FBI announces they've closed their investigation with no arrests and indictments of Trump associates.
This post was edited on 4/14/17 at 11:48 am
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:41 am to RobbBobb
Before this is all over, even the atheists here will understand the current day parallel between this situation & the biblical story regarding Haman and Mordecai.
Haman v. Mordecai 2.0
Haman v. Mordecai 2.0
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:42 am to Tigerdev
You still believe info from our deep state IC is credible.
You should add more info to your post from other "credible" sources like MSM propaganda and Polls. 
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:43 am to RobbBobb
Obama never tapped anyone. You idiots are reaching
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:43 am to RobbBobb
I would love to have been a fly on the wall when the Judge got reinstated. He must have laid out a very strong case that his sources are legit.
Also, the fact that GCHQ actually made a public statement saying "this is nonsense" says a lot. They NEVER make public statements about such rumors.
I found it very weird, in fact, that out of all the press articles Spicer cited that day, everyone picked up on the Judge's comments and called for Nap's head. It really seemed to upset a lot of people -- people who knew that it was all true and wanted to suppress the information.
Also, the fact that GCHQ actually made a public statement saying "this is nonsense" says a lot. They NEVER make public statements about such rumors.
I found it very weird, in fact, that out of all the press articles Spicer cited that day, everyone picked up on the Judge's comments and called for Nap's head. It really seemed to upset a lot of people -- people who knew that it was all true and wanted to suppress the information.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:44 am to Tigerdev
quote:
It is hilarious how you guys only cherry pick the details you want to hear from this reporting. Let's add a few details to your assessment:
1.) The FBI and Intel community at large has stated flatly that there is no validity to Trump's claims
2.) The recent report on the Brits clearly stated it was incidental collection from surveillance on Russian nationals that led to the information being uncovered
3.) The FBI has stated it has an open investigation on the Trump campaign for collusion with a foreign adversary
4.) The facts that Trump officials comms were incidentally collected from surveillance on foreign agents means that...WAIT FOR IT...it is CONFIRMED that Trump officials were communicating with agents of the Russian government during the campaign.
1. James Comey is not to be believed or trusted on anything, at a minimum he is incompetent
2. So what? It is illegal to collect surveillance on Americans from foreign intelligence services and unmask the Americans
3. Based on what and see 1
4. Who cares, it is NOT illegal to meet with or talk to members of the Russian government
Posted on 4/14/17 at 11:45 am to Sentrius
quote:Freudian slip?
very, very likely event that the FBI announces they've closed their investigation with arrest and indictments of Trump associates.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News