I can accept that Putin wanted Trump to win, but

He didn't, he wanted Bernie

I don't think he had a preference except for the next POTUS to NOT be Hillary Rodham Clinton.



Who wants WWIII?

I haven't seen one mention of motive in the print media.
The closest I've seen is on a conspiracy source that says Putin wants to re-establish the USSR and that begins with taking back the Eastern Block.

Supposedly, Putin is planning a big military exercise in Eastern Europe in February. There is such an exercise planned but I'm still not convinced of the motive.

The FBI reddit guy said he wanted Trump to win because it would insure that there would be no WW3.

quote:

---

she knew how to exploit that going forward.

---

She sure had their asses scared with the reset button and the selling of our uranium to them. That is one stone cold, Russian fighting bitch right there.

quote:

---

What I am not hearing in then media is any discussion of why. Now, if I were Putin I wouldn't have any concerns about sa

---

It's all in the report.

It goes back to Putin's 2011 election in which an independent election watchdog organization based in Germany I think concluded Putin's election was rigged including things like stuffing the ballot box.

Hillary as SOS was very vocal internationally about the election corruption by Putin. Thousands of Russians protested in the streets and Putin ordered the arrest of thousands of protesters.

Putin explicitly blamed Hillary Clinton for the protest riots and was looking to get revenge for the delegitimization of his presidency.

That's it in a nutshell.

LINK TO INTELL REPORT

quote:

---

I agree. There are 2 important questions that I have wanted to be answered and have not heard the answers to.

1. WHY did Putin want Trump to win over Hillary.

2. Where are some specific examples of "fake news" originating from Russia. Actual articles.

---

Unfortunately I don't think we're ever going to hear this. MSM wants the point driven repeatedly that Russia influenced the election, tampered, tainted, tinkered with it without providing any additional details. You have to pass a bill to find out what's in it but it's apparently worse if you get to look at these emails and notes about the DNC's dealings.

quote:

---

The FBI reddit guy

---

LINK

This was posted July/September 2016

Clinton et all - Russia bad umkay
Trump et all - ISIS / China bad umkay

See if it plays out like he calls it...

—

His (trump) plan is to have a war with Saudi Arabia and a detente with Russia, throwing China under the bus. Higher petro prices would be good for US economy (energy is the only growth industry over the last decade of any significance) but his opposition will tank the economy with financial shenanigans if he is elected and attempt to punish the public severely for refusing to accept Clinton.

—

We suggest that Trump allow Russia to finish off ISIS, cuts off western funding for them, and stages a soft coup in Saudi Arabia to turn them into a US rather than British client state and use the new possession as leverage against China. No military campaign necessary, trade negotiations with China become incredibly easy, and US / Russian economies are both revitalized as the other two of the top 3 big petro powers.

Don't care who is the face of the policy.


—

There are many significant families involved with the Federal Reserve. Several banking houses that go back to Venice, the Dutch and British royalty.

No aliens.

Hillary is the regime's preferred candidate. They are willing to go with Trump and start a major depression after he gets into office to discredit nationalism though.

Global conflict coming down the line has a lot to do with who gets selected in America this year. Trump wants war with Saudi Arabia and alliance with Russia; Clinton wants more proxy wars against Russia and friendly relationships with China.

—

The main reason an attack on Saudi Arabia is being considered is because the world economy is headed for another deep recession. There is already a glut of oil and it would only get worse. This is very destabilizing to the petrodollar order. There are other benefits like putting pressure on China, but preserving the western financial system is the primary goal.

The purpose of ISIS is to lay the groundwork for another intervention in the ME. You've probably seen a lot of press about Saudi funding of ISIS, and the 28 9/11 pages is another prong in the effort.

—

Saudis will be blamed for supporting 9/11 and ISIS (rather than the west) by Trump. This is part of why he goes on and on about the nonexistent threat of terror

—

8/2016 - Cyberterrorism false flags are on the way. There is going to be a major effort to choke off the internet as an avenue to share ideas and dissent soon.

—

The US will attempt to start prosecuting thought crimes soon as they currently do in Europe. It is very important that the public exercises their right to dissent by refusing to convict as jurors. Even here you have limited ability to act as jury pools are carefully selected to only allow "blue pilled" people. You guys are doing about the best you can on this front already by exercising your right to be provocative, offensive, etc., on a daily basis.

There are two valid reasons why Putin would prefer Trump to Clinton:

1) Oil - the Russians control the flow of natural gas into Europe through their partnership with the Iranians. This is not good for business for the Gulf States, primarily Saudi Arabia. There is a reason why the Clinton Foundation was accepting millions of dollars from the Gulf States themselves and their proxies. There was an expectation that the Clintons would use their power and influence to derail the flow of Iranian petrol to Europe through Russia.

2) Russia's Civil Wars - The Russians have been fighting wars with Chechen and Dagestani Muslims for decades. These hot zones are in the Caucasus region not far from the violence in Turkey and Syria. The Russians want groups like ISIL contained less the violence spill over into the Caucasus. They know Clinton is nothing more than a neoconservative and is far more likely to meddle and engage in war in the region, especially to depose Assad. Trump actually presents as the better choice because he has tended to be more of a non-interventionist given his opposition to the Iraq War.

HRC wanted a no fly zone over Syria to depose Assad. In the debates, when pressed on whether a no-fly zone would entail shooting down Russian jets if necessary, she said yes. Hillary was calling for a war against Russia. Russia does not want a war with the United States, so if they were going to support someone, they would obviously be supporting the candidate NOT calling for war against them.